mirror of
https://github.com/glfw/glfw.git
synced 2024-11-22 13:04:35 +00:00
Cleanup
This commit is contained in:
parent
e40fa3bb94
commit
79de08db06
@ -2115,20 +2115,19 @@ void _glfwSetWindowIconX11(_GLFWwindow* window, int count, const GLFWimage* imag
|
||||
|
||||
for (int j = 0; j < images[i].width * images[i].height; j++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
*target++ = (((unsigned long)images[i].pixels[j * 4 + 0]) << 16) |
|
||||
(((unsigned long)images[i].pixels[j * 4 + 1]) << 8) |
|
||||
(((unsigned long)images[i].pixels[j * 4 + 2]) << 0) |
|
||||
(((unsigned long)images[i].pixels[j * 4 + 3]) << 24);
|
||||
*target++ = (((unsigned long) images[i].pixels[j * 4 + 0]) << 16) |
|
||||
(((unsigned long) images[i].pixels[j * 4 + 1]) << 8) |
|
||||
(((unsigned long) images[i].pixels[j * 4 + 2]) << 0) |
|
||||
(((unsigned long) images[i].pixels[j * 4 + 3]) << 24);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Important: Despite XChangeProperty docs indicating that `icon` (unsigned char*) would be
|
||||
// in the format of the icon image, e.g. 32-bit below, the function actually casts the ptr
|
||||
// (unsigned char*) internally to (long*) and then if long is defined as 64-bits, as on IL64
|
||||
// platforms, extracts only 32 bits from the long leaving the other 32 unused. That is, on a
|
||||
// 64-bit platform XChangeProperty expects 64-bit integers representing 32-bit pixels.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// See https://github.com/glfw/glfw/pull/1986#issuecomment-962445299
|
||||
// NOTE: XChangeProperty expects 32-bit values like the image data above to be
|
||||
// placed in the 32 least significant bits of individual longs. This is
|
||||
// true even if long is 64-bit and a WM protocol calls for "packed" data.
|
||||
// This is because of a historical mistake that then became part of the Xlib
|
||||
// ABI. Xlib will pack these values into a regular array of 32-bit values
|
||||
// before sending it over the wire.
|
||||
XChangeProperty(_glfw.x11.display, window->x11.handle,
|
||||
_glfw.x11.NET_WM_ICON,
|
||||
XA_CARDINAL, 32,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user