From 36d7fd8dd77b2acd8b7be98232130afe2bb711f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jesse Talavera-Greenberg Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 13:44:50 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Finish cleaning up the FAQ section --- doc/glm.tex | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/glm.tex b/doc/glm.tex index c6583796..3dcb6e63 100644 --- a/doc/glm.tex +++ b/doc/glm.tex @@ -1245,7 +1245,7 @@ GTX extensions are considered \emph{experimental}, and may thus introduce breaki \subsection{Where's the documentation?} -The Doxygen-generated documentation includes a complete list of all extensions available, and can be found right \href{http://glm.g-truc.net/html/index.html}{here}. +The Doxygen-generated documentation includes a complete list of all extensions, and can be found \href{http://glm.g-truc.net/html/index.html}{here}. \subsection{Should I use \texttt{using namespace glm;}?} @@ -1257,11 +1257,11 @@ GLM is designed for convenience over performance. \emph{That being said}, the m \subsection{Visual C++ gives me lots of warnings on on warning level \texttt{/W4}.} -You should not have any warnings, even in \verb|/W4| mode. However, if you expect such level for you code, then you should ask for the same level to the compiler by at least disabling the Visual C++ language extensions (\verb|/Za|) which generates warnings when used. If these extensions are enabled, then GLM will take advantage of them and the compiler will generate warnings. +You should not have any warnings, even in \verb|/W4| mode. However, if you expect such level for your code, then you should ask for the same level to the compiler by at least disabling the Visual C++ language extensions (\verb|/Za|) which generates warnings when used. If these extensions are enabled, then GLM will take advantage of them and the compiler will generate warnings. \subsection{Why are some GLM functions vulnerable to division by zero?} -Such behavior is the result of a domain error that follows the precedent set by C and C++. For example, it's a domain error to pass a null vector (all zeroes) to glm::normalize, or even to pass a negative number into \verb|std::sqrt|. +Such behavior follows the precedent set by C and C++'s standard library, in that it's treated as a domain error. For example, it's a domain error to pass a null vector (all zeroes) to \verb|glm::normalize|, or to pass a negative number into \verb|std::sqrt|. \subsection{What unit does GLM use for angles?}