[mlir] Revert to old fold logic in IR::Dialect::add{Types, Attributes}() (#79582)

Fold expressions on Clang are limited to 256 elements. This causes
compilation errors in cases when the amount of elements added exceeds
this limit. Side-step the issue by restoring the original trick that
would use the std::initializer_list. For the record, in our downstream
Clang 16 gives:

mlir/include/mlir/IR/Dialect.h:269:23: fatal error: instantiating fold
expression with 688 arguments exceeded expression nesting limit of 256
    (addType<Args>(), ...);

Partially reverts 26d811b3ecd2fa1ca3d9b41e17fb42b8c7ad03d6.

Co-authored-by: Nikita Kudriavtsev <nikita.kudriavtsev@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit e3a38a75ddc6ff00301ec19a0e2488d00f2cc297)
This commit is contained in:
Andrei Golubev 2024-01-29 10:37:11 +02:00 committed by Tom Stellard
parent bdaf16d59f
commit 0680e84a3f

View File

@ -281,7 +281,11 @@ protected:
/// Register a set of type classes with this dialect.
template <typename... Args>
void addTypes() {
(addType<Args>(), ...);
// This initializer_list argument pack expansion is essentially equal to
// using a fold expression with a comma operator. Clang however, refuses
// to compile a fold expression with a depth of more than 256 by default.
// There seem to be no such limitations for initializer_list.
(void)std::initializer_list<int>{0, (addType<Args>(), 0)...};
}
/// Register a type instance with this dialect.
@ -292,7 +296,11 @@ protected:
/// Register a set of attribute classes with this dialect.
template <typename... Args>
void addAttributes() {
(addAttribute<Args>(), ...);
// This initializer_list argument pack expansion is essentially equal to
// using a fold expression with a comma operator. Clang however, refuses
// to compile a fold expression with a depth of more than 256 by default.
// There seem to be no such limitations for initializer_list.
(void)std::initializer_list<int>{0, (addAttribute<Args>(), 0)...};
}
/// Register an attribute instance with this dialect.