Move folding of icmp with zero after checking for min/max idioms.
Summary: The following transformation for cmp instruction: icmp smin(x, PositiveValue), 0 -> icmp x, 0 should only be done after checking for min/max to prevent infinite looping caused by a reverse canonicalization. That is why this transformation was moved to place after the mentioned check. Reviewers: spatel, efriedma Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38934 Patch by: Artur Gainullin <artur.gainullin@intel.com> llvm-svn: 315895
This commit is contained in:
parent
4543affa98
commit
0e7ebbccc7
@ -1318,6 +1318,24 @@ static Instruction *processUGT_ADDCST_ADD(ICmpInst &I, Value *A, Value *B,
|
||||
return ExtractValueInst::Create(Call, 1, "sadd.overflow");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Handle (icmp sgt smin(PosA, B) 0) -> (icmp sgt B 0)
|
||||
Instruction *InstCombiner::foldICmpWithZero(ICmpInst &Cmp) {
|
||||
CmpInst::Predicate Pred = Cmp.getPredicate();
|
||||
Value *X = Cmp.getOperand(0);
|
||||
|
||||
if (match(Cmp.getOperand(1), m_Zero()) && Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT) {
|
||||
Value *A, *B;
|
||||
SelectPatternResult SPR = matchSelectPattern(X, A, B);
|
||||
if (SPR.Flavor == SPF_SMIN) {
|
||||
if (isKnownPositive(A, DL, 0, &AC, &Cmp, &DT))
|
||||
return new ICmpInst(Pred, B, Cmp.getOperand(1));
|
||||
if (isKnownPositive(B, DL, 0, &AC, &Cmp, &DT))
|
||||
return new ICmpInst(Pred, A, Cmp.getOperand(1));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return nullptr;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Fold icmp Pred X, C.
|
||||
Instruction *InstCombiner::foldICmpWithConstant(ICmpInst &Cmp) {
|
||||
CmpInst::Predicate Pred = Cmp.getPredicate();
|
||||
@ -1349,17 +1367,6 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::foldICmpWithConstant(ICmpInst &Cmp) {
|
||||
return Res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// (icmp sgt smin(PosA, B) 0) -> (icmp sgt B 0)
|
||||
if (C->isNullValue() && Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT) {
|
||||
SelectPatternResult SPR = matchSelectPattern(X, A, B);
|
||||
if (SPR.Flavor == SPF_SMIN) {
|
||||
if (isKnownPositive(A, DL, 0, &AC, &Cmp, &DT))
|
||||
return new ICmpInst(Pred, B, Cmp.getOperand(1));
|
||||
if (isKnownPositive(B, DL, 0, &AC, &Cmp, &DT))
|
||||
return new ICmpInst(Pred, A, Cmp.getOperand(1));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: Use m_APInt to allow folds for splat constants.
|
||||
ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Cmp.getOperand(1));
|
||||
if (!CI)
|
||||
@ -4462,6 +4469,10 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInst(ICmpInst &I) {
|
||||
(SI->getOperand(2) == Op0 && SI->getOperand(1) == Op1))
|
||||
return nullptr;
|
||||
|
||||
// Do this after checking for min/max to prevent infinite looping.
|
||||
if (Instruction *Res = foldICmpWithZero(I))
|
||||
return Res;
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: We only do this after checking for min/max to prevent infinite
|
||||
// looping caused by a reverse canonicalization of these patterns for min/max.
|
||||
// FIXME: The organization of folds is a mess. These would naturally go into
|
||||
|
||||
@ -700,6 +700,7 @@ private:
|
||||
Instruction *foldICmpInstWithConstantNotInt(ICmpInst &Cmp);
|
||||
Instruction *foldICmpBinOp(ICmpInst &Cmp);
|
||||
Instruction *foldICmpEquality(ICmpInst &Cmp);
|
||||
Instruction *foldICmpWithZero(ICmpInst &Cmp);
|
||||
|
||||
Instruction *foldICmpSelectConstant(ICmpInst &Cmp, SelectInst *Select,
|
||||
ConstantInt *C);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ define i32 @clamp_check_for_no_infinite_loop1(i32 %i) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @clamp_check_for_no_infinite_loop1(
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP1:%.*]] = icmp slt i32 [[I:%.*]], 255
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SEL1:%.*]] = select i1 [[CMP1]], i32 [[I]], i32 255
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 [[I]], 0
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 [[SEL1]], 0
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[RES:%.*]] = select i1 [[TMP1]], i32 [[SEL1]], i32 0
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[RES]]
|
||||
;
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user