[libcxx][atomic] Remove workaround for PR31864
I believe the origin issue in PR31864 has been addressed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D59566. As discussed in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53840, `ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE == 2` sometimes is not consistent with `std::atomic<long long>::is_always_lock_free`, since the macro takes `long long`'s ABI alignment into account. https://reviews.llvm.org/D28213 proposed we should not rely on ABI alignment of types, thus we have consistent `ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE` and `std::atomic<long long>::is_always_lock_free` on x86's old cpu. Currently, I plan to move on to remove the workaround which should have been addressed and don't want to break current tests. Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, Quuxplusone Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119931
This commit is contained in:
parent
4d2669002e
commit
86478c7ad8
@ -29,40 +29,6 @@ template <typename T> void checkAlwaysLockFree() {
|
||||
assert(std::atomic<T>().is_lock_free());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: This separate test is needed to work around llvm.org/PR31864
|
||||
// which causes ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE to be defined as '1' in 32-bit builds
|
||||
// even though __atomic_always_lock_free returns true for the same type.
|
||||
constexpr bool NeedWorkaroundForPR31864 =
|
||||
#if defined(__clang__)
|
||||
(sizeof(void*) == 4); // Needed on 32 bit builds
|
||||
#else
|
||||
false;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
template <bool Disable = NeedWorkaroundForPR31864,
|
||||
std::enable_if_t<!Disable>* = nullptr,
|
||||
class LLong = long long,
|
||||
class ULLong = unsigned long long>
|
||||
void checkLongLongTypes() {
|
||||
static_assert(std::atomic<LLong>::is_always_lock_free == (2 == ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE), "");
|
||||
static_assert(std::atomic<ULLong>::is_always_lock_free == (2 == ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE), "");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Used to make the calls to __atomic_always_lock_free dependent on a template
|
||||
// parameter.
|
||||
template <class T> constexpr size_t getSizeOf() { return sizeof(T); }
|
||||
|
||||
template <bool Enable = NeedWorkaroundForPR31864,
|
||||
std::enable_if_t<Enable>* = nullptr,
|
||||
class LLong = long long,
|
||||
class ULLong = unsigned long long>
|
||||
void checkLongLongTypes() {
|
||||
constexpr bool ExpectLockFree = __atomic_always_lock_free(getSizeOf<LLong>(), 0);
|
||||
static_assert(std::atomic<LLong>::is_always_lock_free == ExpectLockFree, "");
|
||||
static_assert(std::atomic<ULLong>::is_always_lock_free == ExpectLockFree, "");
|
||||
static_assert((0 != ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE) == ExpectLockFree, "");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void run()
|
||||
{
|
||||
// structs and unions can't be defined in the template invocation.
|
||||
@ -140,7 +106,8 @@ void run()
|
||||
static_assert(std::atomic<unsigned int>::is_always_lock_free == (2 == ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_FREE), "");
|
||||
static_assert(std::atomic<long>::is_always_lock_free == (2 == ATOMIC_LONG_LOCK_FREE), "");
|
||||
static_assert(std::atomic<unsigned long>::is_always_lock_free == (2 == ATOMIC_LONG_LOCK_FREE), "");
|
||||
checkLongLongTypes();
|
||||
static_assert(std::atomic<long long>::is_always_lock_free == (2 == ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE), "");
|
||||
static_assert(std::atomic<unsigned long long>::is_always_lock_free == (2 == ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE), "");
|
||||
static_assert(std::atomic<void*>::is_always_lock_free == (2 == ATOMIC_POINTER_LOCK_FREE), "");
|
||||
static_assert(std::atomic<std::nullptr_t>::is_always_lock_free == (2 == ATOMIC_POINTER_LOCK_FREE), "");
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user