[Clang] FunctionEffects: Make a separate diagnostic group for redeclarations/overrides where effects are implicit. (#148690)

The current function effect diagnostics include these behaviors:

When you declare a function `nonblocking` (typically in a header) and
then omit the attribute on the implementation (or any other
redeclaration), Clang warns: attribute 'nonblocking' on function does
not match previous declaration.

But if a `nonblocking` function is a C++ virtual method, then overrides
are implicitly nonblocking; the attribute doesn't need to be explicitly
stated.

These behaviors are arguably inconsistent -- and also, both, more
pedantic than the rest of the function effect diagnostics.

This PR accomplishes two things:

- Separates the diagnostic on a redeclaration into a new group,
`-Wfunction-effect-redeclarations`, so it can be disabled independently.

- Adds a second diagnostic to this new group, for the case of an
override method missing the attribute. (This helps in a situation where
I'm trying to add `nonblocking` via a macro that does other things and I
want to know that the macro is missing on an override declaration.)

---------

Co-authored-by: Doug Wyatt <dwyatt@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Sirraide <aeternalmail@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Doug Wyatt 2025-07-16 08:24:28 -07:00 committed by GitHub
parent a89e6f6672
commit cfc20ea15e
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
5 changed files with 47 additions and 15 deletions

View File

@ -710,6 +710,12 @@ Improvements to Clang's diagnostics
pointer, provided it can be proven that the pointer only points to
``[[noreturn]]`` functions.
- Added a separate diagnostic group ``-Wfunction-effect-redeclarations``, for the more pedantic
diagnostics for function effects (``[[clang::nonblocking]]`` and ``[[clang::nonallocating]]``).
Moved the warning for a missing (though implied) attribute on a redeclaration into this group.
Added a new warning in this group for the case where the attribute is missing/implicit on
an override of a virtual method.
Improvements to Clang's time-trace
----------------------------------

View File

@ -1293,6 +1293,7 @@ def ThreadSafetyBeta : DiagGroup<"thread-safety-beta">;
// Warnings and notes related to the function effects system which underlies
// the nonblocking and nonallocating attributes.
def FunctionEffects : DiagGroup<"function-effects">;
def FunctionEffectRedeclarations : DiagGroup<"function-effect-redeclarations">;
def PerfConstraintImpliesNoexcept : DiagGroup<"perf-constraint-implies-noexcept">;
// Uniqueness Analysis warnings

View File

@ -11530,17 +11530,28 @@ def note_in_evaluating_default_argument : Note<
def warn_invalid_add_func_effects : Warning<
"attribute '%0' should not be added via type conversion">,
InGroup<FunctionEffects>, DefaultIgnore;
def warn_mismatched_func_effect_override : Warning<
"attribute '%0' on overriding function does not match base declaration">,
InGroup<FunctionEffects>, DefaultIgnore;
def warn_mismatched_func_effect_redeclaration : Warning<
"attribute '%0' on function does not match previous declaration">,
InGroup<FunctionEffects>, DefaultIgnore;
def warn_conflicting_func_effect_override
: Warning<"attribute '%0' on overriding function conflicts with base "
"declaration">,
InGroup<FunctionEffects>,
DefaultIgnore;
def warn_conflicting_func_effects : Warning<
"effects conflict when merging declarations; kept '%0', discarded '%1'">,
InGroup<FunctionEffects>, DefaultIgnore;
def err_func_with_effects_no_prototype : Error<
"'%0' function must have a prototype">;
// These are more pedantic: in redeclarations and virtual method overrides,
// the effect attribute(s) should be restated.
def warn_mismatched_func_effect_override
: Warning<"overriding function is missing '%0' attribute from base "
"declaration">,
InGroup<FunctionEffectRedeclarations>,
DefaultIgnore;
def warn_mismatched_func_effect_redeclaration
: Warning<
"redeclaration is missing '%0' attribute from previous declaration">,
InGroup<FunctionEffectRedeclarations>,
DefaultIgnore;
} // end of sema category

View File

@ -18682,7 +18682,7 @@ bool Sema::CheckOverridingFunctionAttributes(CXXMethodDecl *New,
case FunctionEffectDiff::OverrideResult::NoAction:
break;
case FunctionEffectDiff::OverrideResult::Warn:
Diag(New->getLocation(), diag::warn_mismatched_func_effect_override)
Diag(New->getLocation(), diag::warn_conflicting_func_effect_override)
<< Diff.effectName();
Diag(Old->getLocation(), diag::note_overridden_virtual_function)
<< Old->getReturnTypeSourceRange();
@ -18695,6 +18695,14 @@ bool Sema::CheckOverridingFunctionAttributes(CXXMethodDecl *New,
QualType ModQT = Context.getFunctionType(NewFT->getReturnType(),
NewFT->getParamTypes(), EPI);
New->setType(ModQT);
if (Errs.empty()) {
// A warning here is somewhat pedantic. Skip this if there was
// already a merge conflict, which is more serious.
Diag(New->getLocation(), diag::warn_mismatched_func_effect_override)
<< Diff.effectName();
Diag(Old->getLocation(), diag::note_overridden_virtual_function)
<< Old->getReturnTypeSourceRange();
}
break;
}
}

View File

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fblocks -fcxx-exceptions -verify -Wfunction-effects %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fblocks -verify -x c -std=c23 -Wfunction-effects %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fblocks -fcxx-exceptions -verify -Wfunction-effects -Wfunction-effect-redeclarations %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fblocks -verify -x c -std=c23 -Wfunction-effects -Wfunction-effect-redeclarations %s
#if !__has_attribute(nonblocking)
#error "the 'nonblocking' attribute is not available"
@ -127,29 +127,35 @@ void type_conversions_2()
#endif
// --- VIRTUAL METHODS ---
// Attributes propagate to overridden methods, so no diagnostics except for conflicts.
// Attributes propagate to overridden methods.
// Check this in the syntax tests too.
#ifdef __cplusplus
struct Base {
virtual void f1();
virtual void nonblocking() noexcept [[clang::nonblocking]];
virtual void nonallocating() noexcept [[clang::nonallocating]];
virtual void nonblocking() noexcept [[clang::nonblocking]]; // expected-note {{overridden virtual function is here}}
virtual void nonallocating() noexcept [[clang::nonallocating]]; // expected-note {{overridden virtual function is here}}
virtual void f2() [[clang::nonallocating]]; // expected-note {{previous declaration is here}}
virtual void f3() [[clang::nonblocking]]; // expected-note {{overridden virtual function is here}}
};
struct Derived : public Base {
void f1() [[clang::nonblocking]] override;
void nonblocking() noexcept override;
void nonallocating() noexcept override;
void nonblocking() noexcept override; // expected-warning {{overriding function is missing 'nonblocking' attribute from base declaration}}
void nonallocating() noexcept override; // expected-warning {{overriding function is missing 'nonallocating' attribute from base declaration}}
void f2() [[clang::allocating]] override; // expected-warning {{effects conflict when merging declarations; kept 'allocating', discarded 'nonallocating'}}
};
template <bool B>
struct TDerived : public Base {
void f3() [[clang::nonblocking(B)]] override; // expected-warning {{attribute 'nonblocking' on overriding function conflicts with base declaration}}
};
#endif // __cplusplus
// --- REDECLARATIONS ---
void f2();
void f2() [[clang::nonblocking]]; // expected-note {{previous declaration is here}}
void f2(); // expected-warning {{attribute 'nonblocking' on function does not match previous declaration}}
void f2(); // expected-warning {{redeclaration is missing 'nonblocking' attribute from previous declaration}}
// Note: we verify that the attribute is actually seen during the constraints tests.
void f3() [[clang::blocking]]; // expected-note {{previous declaration is here}}