[LoopPeel] Use loop guards when checking if last iter can be peeled. (#142605)
Apply loop guards to BTC before checking if the last iteration should be peeled off. This also adds an assert to make sure applying the guards does not pessimize the results. I checked on a large test set and it did not trigger there, but it adds an additional guard to catch potential cases where loop-guards pessimize results. Peels ~15% more loops. PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142605
This commit is contained in:
parent
20e8de9c8f
commit
e5ff7055be
@ -374,6 +374,9 @@ static bool shouldPeelLastIteration(Loop &L, CmpPredicate Pred,
|
||||
L.getLoopPredecessor()->getTerminator()))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
auto Guards = ScalarEvolution::LoopGuards::collect(&L, SE);
|
||||
BTC = SE.applyLoopGuards(BTC, Guards);
|
||||
RightSCEV = SE.applyLoopGuards(RightSCEV, Guards);
|
||||
const SCEV *ValAtLastIter = LeftAR->evaluateAtIteration(BTC, SE);
|
||||
const SCEV *ValAtSecondToLastIter = LeftAR->evaluateAtIteration(
|
||||
SE.getMinusSCEV(BTC, SE.getOne(BTC->getType())), SE);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -13,14 +13,33 @@ define void @peel_with_guard_known_nonnegative_1(i32 %n) {
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[N_EXT:%.*]] = zext i32 [[N]] to i64
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[N_1:%.*]] = add i32 [[N]], 1
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[WIDE_TRIP_COUNT:%.*]] = zext i32 [[N_1]] to i64
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP0:%.*]] = add nsw i64 [[WIDE_TRIP_COUNT]], -1
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = icmp ne i64 [[TMP0]], 0
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[TMP1]], label %[[PH_SPLIT:.*]], label %[[EXIT_LOOPEXIT_PEEL_BEGIN:.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: [[PH_SPLIT]]:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[LOOP:.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: [[LOOP]]:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV:%.*]] = phi i64 [ 0, %[[PH]] ], [ [[IV_NEXT:%.*]], %[[LOOP]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV1:%.*]] = phi i64 [ 0, %[[PH_SPLIT]] ], [ [[IV_NEXT1:%.*]], %[[LOOP]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV_NEXT1]] = add nuw nsw i64 [[IV1]], 1
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP2:%.*]] = sub i64 [[WIDE_TRIP_COUNT]], 1
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[EC1:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[IV_NEXT1]], [[TMP2]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[EC1]], label %[[EXIT_LOOPEXIT_PEEL_BEGIN_LOOPEXIT:.*]], label %[[LOOP]], !llvm.loop [[LOOP0:![0-9]+]]
|
||||
; CHECK: [[EXIT_LOOPEXIT_PEEL_BEGIN_LOOPEXIT]]:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[DOTPH:%.*]] = phi i64 [ [[IV_NEXT1]], %[[LOOP]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[EXIT_LOOPEXIT_PEEL_BEGIN]]
|
||||
; CHECK: [[EXIT_LOOPEXIT_PEEL_BEGIN]]:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV:%.*]] = phi i64 [ 0, %[[PH]] ], [ [[DOTPH]], %[[EXIT_LOOPEXIT_PEEL_BEGIN_LOOPEXIT]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[LOOP_PEEL:.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: [[LOOP_PEEL]]:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[IV]], [[N_EXT]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SPEC_SELECT:%.*]] = select i1 [[C]], i32 10, i32 20
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV_NEXT]] = add i64 [[IV]], 1
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV_NEXT:%.*]] = add i64 [[IV]], 1
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[EC:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[IV_NEXT]], [[WIDE_TRIP_COUNT]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[EC]], label %[[EXIT_LOOPEXIT:.*]], label %[[LOOP]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[EC]], label %[[EXIT_LOOPEXIT_PEEL_NEXT:.*]], label %[[EXIT_LOOPEXIT_PEEL_NEXT]]
|
||||
; CHECK: [[EXIT_LOOPEXIT_PEEL_NEXT]]:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[LOOP_PEEL_NEXT:.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: [[LOOP_PEEL_NEXT]]:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[EXIT_LOOPEXIT:.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: [[EXIT_LOOPEXIT]]:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[EXIT]]
|
||||
; CHECK: [[EXIT]]:
|
||||
@ -137,7 +156,7 @@ define void @peel_with_guard2(i32 %n) {
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV_NEXT]] = add nuw i32 [[IV]], 1
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP2:%.*]] = sub i32 [[N]], 1
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[EC:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[IV_NEXT]], [[TMP2]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[EC]], label %[[EXIT_LOOPEXIT_PEEL_BEGIN_LOOPEXIT:.*]], label %[[LOOP_HEADER]], !llvm.loop [[LOOP0:![0-9]+]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[EC]], label %[[EXIT_LOOPEXIT_PEEL_BEGIN_LOOPEXIT:.*]], label %[[LOOP_HEADER]], !llvm.loop [[LOOP2:![0-9]+]]
|
||||
; CHECK: [[EXIT_LOOPEXIT_PEEL_BEGIN_LOOPEXIT]]:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[DOTPH:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[IV_NEXT]], %[[LOOP_LATCH]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[EXIT_LOOPEXIT_PEEL_BEGIN]]
|
||||
@ -188,4 +207,5 @@ exit:
|
||||
;.
|
||||
; CHECK: [[LOOP0]] = distinct !{[[LOOP0]], [[META1:![0-9]+]]}
|
||||
; CHECK: [[META1]] = !{!"llvm.loop.peeled.count", i32 1}
|
||||
; CHECK: [[LOOP2]] = distinct !{[[LOOP2]], [[META1]]}
|
||||
;.
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user