Fix PR20479 -- missing vftable slots in case of virtual inheritance vs return adjusting thunks

Reviewed at http://reviews.llvm.org/D4829

llvm-svn: 215285
This commit is contained in:
Timur Iskhodzhanov 2014-08-09 17:08:06 +00:00
parent 9cf3625742
commit f97c973c2e
3 changed files with 39 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -3174,9 +3174,16 @@ void MicrosoftVTableContext::computeVTablePaths(bool ForVBTables,
Paths.push_back(new VPtrInfo(RD));
// Recursive case: get all the vbtables from our bases and remove anything
// that shares a virtual base.
// that shares a virtual base. Look at non-virtual bases first so we get
// longer inheritance paths from the derived class to the virtual bases.
llvm::SmallVector<CXXBaseSpecifier, 10> Bases;
std::copy_if(RD->bases_begin(), RD->bases_end(), std::back_inserter(Bases),
[](CXXBaseSpecifier bs) { return !bs.isVirtual(); });
std::copy_if(RD->bases_begin(), RD->bases_end(), std::back_inserter(Bases),
[](CXXBaseSpecifier bs) { return bs.isVirtual(); });
llvm::SmallPtrSet<const CXXRecordDecl*, 4> VBasesSeen;
for (const auto &B : RD->bases()) {
for (const auto &B : Bases) {
const CXXRecordDecl *Base = B.getType()->getAsCXXRecordDecl();
if (B.isVirtual() && VBasesSeen.count(Base))
continue;

View File

@ -104,3 +104,27 @@ K::K() {}
// GLOBALS-LABEL: @"\01??_7K@test2@@6B@" = linkonce_odr unnamed_addr constant [3 x i8*]
}
namespace pr20479 {
struct A {
virtual A *f();
};
struct B : virtual A {
virtual B *f();
};
struct C : virtual A, B {
// VFTABLES-LABEL: VFTable for 'pr20479::A' in 'pr20479::B' in 'pr20479::C' (2 entries).
// VFTABLES-NEXT: 0 | pr20479::B *pr20479::B::f()
// VFTABLES-NEXT: [return adjustment (to type 'struct pr20479::A *'): vbase #1, 0 non-virtual]
// VFTABLES-NEXT: 1 | pr20479::B *pr20479::B::f()
C();
};
C::C() {}
// GLOBALS-LABEL: @"\01??_7C@pr20479@@6B@" = linkonce_odr unnamed_addr constant [2 x i8*]
// GLOBALS: @"\01?f@B@pr20479@@QAEPAUA@2@XZ"
// GLOBALS: @"\01?f@B@pr20479@@UAEPAU12@XZ"
}

View File

@ -573,6 +573,10 @@ struct Q {
// PR19172: Yet another diamond we miscompiled.
struct R : virtual Q, X {
// CHECK-LABEL: VFTable for 'vdtors::X' in 'vdtors::R' (2 entries).
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | vdtors::R::~R() [scalar deleting]
// CHECK-NEXT: 1 | void vdtors::X::zzz()
// CHECK-LABEL: VFTable for 'vdtors::Q' in 'vdtors::R' (1 entry).
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | vdtors::R::~R() [scalar deleting]
// CHECK-NEXT: [this adjustment: -8 non-virtual]
@ -580,10 +584,6 @@ struct R : virtual Q, X {
// CHECK-LABEL: Thunks for 'vdtors::R::~R()' (1 entry).
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | [this adjustment: -8 non-virtual]
// CHECK-LABEL: VFTable for 'vdtors::X' in 'vdtors::R' (2 entries).
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | vdtors::R::~R() [scalar deleting]
// CHECK-NEXT: 1 | void vdtors::X::zzz()
// CHECK-LABEL: VFTable indices for 'vdtors::R' (1 entry).
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | vdtors::R::~R() [scalar deleting]
virtual ~R();
@ -694,10 +694,10 @@ struct X : virtual B {};
struct Y : virtual X, B {
Y();
// CHECK-LABEL: VFTable for 'B' in 'pr19066::X' in 'pr19066::Y' (1 entry).
// CHECK-LABEL: VFTable for 'B' in 'pr19066::Y' (1 entry).
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | void B::g()
// CHECK-LABEL: VFTable for 'B' in 'pr19066::Y' (1 entry).
// CHECK-LABEL: VFTable for 'B' in 'pr19066::X' in 'pr19066::Y' (1 entry).
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | void B::g()
};