Note that PointerUnion::{is,get} have been soft deprecated in
PointerUnion.h:
// FIXME: Replace the uses of is(), get() and dyn_cast() with
// isa<T>, cast<T> and the llvm::dyn_cast<T>
I'm not touching PointerUnion::dyn_cast for now because it's a bit
complicated; we could blindly migrate it to dyn_cast_if_present, but
we should probably use dyn_cast when the operand is known to be
non-null.
Note that PointerUnion::{is,get} have been soft deprecated in
PointerUnion.h:
// FIXME: Replace the uses of is(), get() and dyn_cast() with
// isa<T>, cast<T> and the llvm::dyn_cast<T>
I'm not touching PointerUnion::dyn_cast for now because it's a bit
complicated; we could blindly migrate it to dyn_cast_if_present, but
we should probably use dyn_cast when the operand is known to be
non-null.
This is an enabler for https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92855
This allows an NTTP default argument to be set as an arbitrary
TemplateArgument, not just an expression.
This allows template parameter packs to have default arguments in the
AST, even though the language proper doesn't support the syntax for it.
This allows NTTP default arguments to be other kinds of arguments, like
packs, integral constants, and such.
This is an enabler for a future patch.
This allows an type-parameter default argument to be set as an arbitrary
TemplateArgument, not just a type.
This allows template parameter packs to have default arguments in the
AST, even though the language proper doesn't support the syntax for it.
This will be used in a later patch which synthesizes template parameter
lists with arbitrary default arguments taken from template
specializations.
There are a few places we used SubsType, because we only had a type, now
we use SubstTemplateArgument.
SubstTemplateArgument was missing arguments for setting Instantiation
location and entity names.
Adding those is needed so we don't regress in diagnostics.
Our current method of storing the template arguments as written for
`(Class/Var)Template(Partial)SpecializationDecl` suffers from a number
of flaws:
- We use `TypeSourceInfo` to store `TemplateArgumentLocs` for class
template/variable template partial/explicit specializations. For
variable template specializations, this is a rather unintuitive hack (as
we store a non-type specialization as a type). Moreover, we don't ever
*need* the type as written -- in almost all cases, we only want the
template arguments (e.g. in tooling use-cases).
- The template arguments as written are stored in a number of redundant
data members. For example, `(Class/Var)TemplatePartialSpecialization`
have their own `ArgsAsWritten` member that stores an
`ASTTemplateArgumentListInfo` (the template arguments).
`VarTemplateSpecializationDecl` has yet _another_ redundant member
"`TemplateArgsInfo`" that also stores an `ASTTemplateArgumentListInfo`.
This patch eliminates all
`(Class/Var)Template(Partial)SpecializationDecl` members which store the
template arguments as written, and turns the `ExplicitInfo` member into
a `llvm::PointerUnion<const ASTTemplateArgumentListInfo*,
ExplicitInstantiationInfo*>` (to avoid unnecessary allocations when the
declaration isn't an explicit instantiation). The template arguments as
written are now accessed via `getTemplateArgsWritten` in all cases.
The "most breaking" change is to AST Matchers, insofar that `hasTypeLoc`
will no longer match class template specializations (since they no
longer store the type as written).
Add support for concepts and requires expression in the clang index.
Genarate USRs for concepts.
Also change how `RecursiveASTVisitor` handles return type requirement in
requires expressions. The new code unpacks the synthetic template parameter
list used for storing the actual expression. This simplifies
implementation of the indexing. No code seems to depend on the original
traversal anyway and the synthesized template parameter list is easily
accessible from inside the requires expression if needed.
Add tests in the clangd codebase.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/1103.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124441
Assuming `ns::foo` doesn't exist, given:
```
using ns::foo __attribute__((using_if_exists));
```
The AST will look something like:
UsingDecl
UsingShadowDecl
UnresolvedUsingIfExistsDecl
Thus we end up adding a reference to `UnresolvedUsingIfExistsDecl` when
processing `UsingDecl`, but never add the decl itself. In this case the
decl is really the `UsingDecl` anyway though (which we do output), so it
makes more sense to just remove the extra reference.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124288
We can end up with a call to `indexTopLevelDecl(D)` with `D == nullptr` in non-assert builds e.g. when indexing a module in `indexModule` and
- `ASTReader::GetDecl` returns `nullptr` if `Index >= DeclsLoaded.size()`, thus returning `nullptr`
=> `ModuleDeclIterator::operator*` returns `nullptr`
=> we call `IndexCtx.indexTopLevelDecl` with `nullptr`
Be resilient and just ignore the `nullptr` decls during indexing.
Reviewed By: akyrtzi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102001
Summary:
We already skip function bodies from these files while parsing, and drop symbols
found in them. However, traversing their ASTs still takes a substantial amount
of time.
Non-scientific benchmark on my machine:
background-indexing llvm-project (llvm+clang+clang-tools-extra), wall time
before: 7:46
after: 5:13
change: -33%
Indexer.cpp libclang should be updated too, I'm less familiar with that code,
and it's doing tricky things with the ShouldSkipFunctionBody callback, so it
needs to be done separately.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80296
This patch is motivated by (and factored out from)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66121 which is a debug info bugfix. Starting
with DWARF 5 all Objective-C methods are nested inside their
containing type, and that patch implements this for synthesized
Objective-C properties.
1. SemaObjCProperty populates a list of synthesized accessors that may
need to inserted into an ObjCImplDecl.
2. SemaDeclObjC::ActOnEnd inserts forward-declarations for all
accessors for which no override was provided into their
ObjCImplDecl. This patch does *not* synthesize AST function
*bodies*. Moving that code from the static analyzer into Sema may
be a good idea though.
3. Places that expect all methods to have bodies have been updated.
I did not update the static analyzer's inliner for synthesized
properties to point back to the property declaration (see
test/Analysis/Inputs/expected-plists/nullability-notes.m.plist), which
I believed to be more bug than a feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68108
rdar://problem/53782400
Summary:
In current indexing logic we get references to class itself when we see
a constructor/destructor which is only syntactically true. Semantically
this information is not correct. This patch marks that reference as
NameReference to let clients deal with it.
Reviewers: akyrtzi, gribozavr, nathawes, benlangmuir
Reviewed By: gribozavr, nathawes
Subscribers: nathawes, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58814
llvm-svn: 355668
Currently the symbol for MSPropertyDecl has kind `SymbolKind::Unknown`
which can trip up various indexing tools.
rdar://problem/46764224
Reviewers: akyrtzi, benlangmuir, jkorous
Reviewed By: jkorous
Subscribers: dexonsmith, cfe-commits, jkorous, jdoerfert, arphaman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57628
llvm-svn: 354942
Summary:
Add indexing of UsingDecl itself.
Also enable generation of USRs for UsingDecls, using the qualified name of the
decl.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, akyrtzi
Subscribers: arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58340
llvm-svn: 354878
Summary:
clangd uses indexing api to provide references and it was not possible
to perform symbol information for template parameters. This patch enables
visiting of TemplateTypeParmTypeLocs.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, akyrtzi
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, ioeric, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58293
llvm-svn: 354560
Summary:
Parameters in declarations are useful for clangd, so that we can
provide symbol information for them as well. It also helps clangd to be
consistent whether a function's definition is accessible or not.
Reviewers: hokein, akyrtzi
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57949
llvm-svn: 353695
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
With IndexImplicitInstantiation=true, the following case records an occurrence of B::bar in A::foo, which will benefit cross reference tools.
template <class T> struct B { void bar() {}};
template <class T> struct A { void foo(B<T> *x) { x->bar(); }};
int main() { A<int> a; a.foo(0); }
Reviewers: akyrtzi, arphaman, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49002
llvm-svn: 336606
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
TemplateTemplateParmDecls of alias templates ended-up serialized as 'file-level decls' which was causing a crash while trying to index a PCH/module file that contained them.
Commit makes sure TemplateTemplateParmDecls are not recorded as such kind of decls.
Fixes crash of rdar://36608297
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42588
llvm-svn: 323549
The 'decl' role is more canonical than the 'ref'. This helps us establish the
'specialization-of' relation just by looking at decls or defs.
rdar://31884960
llvm-svn: 317832
In dependent contexts we end up referencing these, so make sure they
have USRs, and have their declarations indexed. For the most part they
behave like typedefs, but we also need to worry about having multiple
using declarations with the same "name".
rdar://problem/33883650
llvm-svn: 311053
CXXDeductionGuideDecls can't be referenced so there's no need to output a symbol occurrence for them.
Also handle DeducedTemplateSpecializationTypeLocs in the TypeIndexer so we don't miss the symbol occurrences of the corresponding template decls.
Patch by Nathan Hawes!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36641
llvm-svn: 310933
of class template specializations
This commit fixes an issue where a forward declaration of a class template
specialization was not related to the base template. We need to relate even
forward declarations because specializations don't have to be defined.
rdar://32869409
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34462
llvm-svn: 305996
"specializationOf" relation if they pseudo-override a type in the base template
This commit fixes an issue where Xcode's renaming engine couldn't find the
reference to the second occurrence of "InnerClass" in this example:
template<typename T> struct Ts { template<typename U> struct InnerClass { }; };
template<> struct Ts<int> {
template<typename U> struct InnerClass; // This occurrence wasn't renamed
};
rdar://31884960
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34392
llvm-svn: 305911
static_assert declarations have to be visited while indexing so that we can
gather the references to declarations that are present in their assert
expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33913
llvm-svn: 305504
specializations that 'override' declarations in the base template should use
the 'specializationOf' relation instead of 'specializationOf | overrideOf'.
The indexer relations are meant to be orthogonal, so 'specializationOf' is
better than the combined relation.
llvm-svn: 302136
