Currently, clang gives an incorrect reduction identifier error for the PLUS
operator for OpenMP version > 52. But, PLUS operator is allowed in OpenMP
version > 52. This revision fixes this issue and also modified the error
messages to show the correct expected operators in the message based on the OpenMP
version used (prior to OMP 6.0 and since OMP 6.0).
Test Src:
void foo() {
int a = 0 ;
#pragma omp parallel reduction(+:a)
;
#pragma omp parallel reduction(-:a)
;
}
Before this revision:
$ clang -fopenmp -fopenmp-version=60 test.c -c
test.c:3:34: error: incorrect reduction identifier, expected one of '+', '-', '*', '&', '|', '^', '&&', '||', 'min' or 'max' or declare reduction for type 'int'
3 | #pragma omp parallel reduction(+:a)
| ^
test.c:5:34: error: incorrect reduction identifier, expected one of '+', '-', '*', '&', '|', '^', '&&', '||', 'min' or 'max' or declare reduction for type 'int'
5 | #pragma omp parallel reduction(-:a)
| ^
2 errors generated.
Wit this revision:
$ clang -fopenmp -fopenmp-version=60 test.c -c
test.c:5:34: error: incorrect reduction identifier, expected one of '+', '*', '&', '|', '^', '&&', '||', 'min' or 'max' or declare reduction for type 'int'
5 | #pragma omp parallel reduction(-:a)
|
1 error generated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155635
The OpenMP spec seems to require the compound operators be used for
+, *, &, |, and ^ reduction. So use these if a class has those operators.
If not try the simple operators as we did previously to limit the impact
to existing code.
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48584
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101941
Summary:
omp.h header file defines omp_null_allocator as a predefined allocator,
need to consider it also as a predefined allocator.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: jholewinski, yaxunl, guansong, cfe-commits, caomhin
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79186
