This PR updates the tablegen emitter for command options to support a
simplified syntax to underline the mnemonic. Previously, you had to
write `${ansi.underline}<L>${ansi.normal}`, where `<L>` is the mnemonic.
This really hurt the readability of the description. With this PR, you
can write `${<L>}` instead.
This patch should allow the user to set specific auto-completion type
for their custom commands.
To do so, we had to hoist the `CompletionType` enum so the user can
access it and add a new completion type flag to the CommandScriptAdd
Command Object.
So now, the user can specify which completion type will be used with
their custom command, when they register it.
This also makes the `crashlog` custom commands use disk-file completion
type, to browse through the user file system and load the report.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152011
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <ismail@bennani.ma>
Refactor the command option enum values and the command argument table
to connect the two. This has two benefits:
- We guarantee that two options that use the same argument type have
the same accepted values.
- We can print the enum values and their description in the help
output. (D129707)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129703
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Splitting the different logic is cleaner and we it will be easier
to implement the enum emitting (which otherwise would have to
reimplement the Record parsing).
llvm-svn: 367207
Summary:
Right now our CommandOptions.inc only generates the initializer for the options list but
not the array declaration boilerplate around it. As the array definition is identical for all arrays,
we might as well also let the CommandOptions.inc generate it alongside the initializers.
This patch will also allow us to generate additional declarations related to that option list in
the future (e.g. a enum class representing the specific options which would make our
handling code less prone).
This patch also fixes a few option tables that didn't follow our naming style.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65331
llvm-svn: 367186
We dynamically allocate the option validator which means we
can't mark this list of OptionDefinitions as constexpr. It's also
more complicated than necessary.
llvm-svn: 367102
We currently emit the option groups twice if Groups<[1,2,3]> is
used in the tablegen. This leads to compilation errors. This
patch just removes the line that accidentially emits the option
group a second time.
llvm-svn: 366414
Summary:
We currently have man large arrays containing initializers for our command options.
These tables are tricky maintain as we don't have any good place to check them for consistency and
it's also hard to read (`nullptr, {}, 0` is not very descriptive).
This patch fixes this by letting table gen generate those tables. This way we can have a more readable
syntax for this (especially for all the default arguments) and we can let TableCheck check them
for consistency (e.g. an option with an optional argument can't have `eArgTypeNone`, naming of flags', etc.).
Also refactoring the related data structures can now be done without changing the hundred of option initializers.
For example, this line:
```
{LLDB_OPT_SET_ALL, false, "hide-aliases", 'a', OptionParser::eNoArgument, nullptr, {}, 0, eArgTypeNone, "Hide aliases in the command list."},
```
becomes this:
```
def hide_aliases : Option<"hide-aliases", "a">, Desc<"Hide aliases in the command list.">;
```
For now I just moved a few initializers to the new format to demonstrate the change. I'll slowly migrate the other
option initializers tables in separate patches.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, sgraenitz
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: jingham, xiaobai, labath, mgorny, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64365
llvm-svn: 365908
