## Purpose
Export a small number of private LLVM symbols so that unit tests can
still build/run when LLVM is built as a Windows DLL or a shared library
with default hidden symbol visibility.
## Background
The effort to build LLVM as a WIndows DLL is tracked in #109483.
Additional context is provided in [this
discourse](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/psa-annotating-llvm-public-interface/85307).
Some LLVM unit tests use internal/private symbols that are not part of
LLVM's public interface. When building LLVM as a DLL or shared library
with default hidden symbol visibility, the symbols are not available
when the unit test links against the DLL or shared library.
This problem can be solved in one of two ways:
1. Export the private symbols from the DLL.
2. Link the unit tests against the intermediate static libraries instead
of the final LLVM DLL.
This PR applies option 1. Based on the discussion of option 2 in
#145448, this option is preferable.
## Overview
* Adds a new `LLVM_ABI_FOR_TEST` export macro, which is currently just
an alias for `LLVM_ABI`.
* Annotates the sub-set of symbols under `llvm/lib` that are required to
get unit tests building using the new macro.
This patch adds a new recipe to combine multiple recipes into an
'expression' recipe, which should be considered as single entity for
cost-modeling and transforms. The recipe needs to be 'decomposed', i.e.
replaced by its individual recipes before execute.
This subsumes VPExtendedReductionRecipe and
VPMulAccumulateReductionRecipe and should make it easier to extend to
include more types of bundled patterns, like e.g. extends folded into
loads or various arithmetic instructions, if supported by the target.
It allows avoiding re-creating the original recipes when converting to
concrete recipes, together with removing the need to record various
information. The current version of the patch still retains the original
printing matching VPExtendedReductionRecipe and
VPMulAccumulateReductionRecipe, but this specialized print could be
replaced with printing the bundled recipes directly.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144281
Building on top of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114305,
replace VPRegionBlocks with explicit CFG before executing.
This brings the final VPlan closer to the IR that is generated and
helps to simplify codegen.
It will also enable further simplifications of phi handling during
execution and transformations that do not have to preserve the
canonical IV required by loop regions. This for example could include
replacing the canonical IV with an EVL based phi while completely
removing the original canonical IV.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117506
This patch introduce two new recipes.
* VPExtendedReductionRecipe
- cast + reduction.
* VPMulAccumulateReductionRecipe
- (cast) + mul + reduction.
This patch also implements the transformation that match following
patterns via vplan and converts to abstract recipes for better cost
estimation.
* VPExtendedReduction
- reduce(cast(...))
* VPMulAccumulateReductionRecipe
- reduce.add(mul(...))
- reduce.add(mul(ext(...), ext(...))
- reduce.add(ext(mul(ext(...), ext(...))))
The converted abstract recipes will be lower to the concrete recipes
(widen-cast + widen-mul + reduction) just before recipe execution.
Note that this patch still relies on legacy cost model the calculate the
cost for these patters.
Will enable vplan-based cost decision in #113903.
Split from #113903.
This PR accounts for scaled reductions in `calculateRegisterUsage` to
reflect the fact that the number of lanes in their output is smaller
than the VF.
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126437
There are some opcodes that currently require specialized recipes, due
to their result type not being implied by their operands, including
casts.
This leads to duplication from defining multiple full recipes.
This patch introduces a new VPInstructionWithType subclass that also
stores the result type. The general idea is to have opcodes needing to
specify a result type to use this general recipe. The current patch
replaces VPScalarCastRecipe with VInstructionWithType, a similar patch
for VPWidenCastRecipe will follow soon.
There are a few proposed opcodes that should also benefit, without the
need of workarounds:
* https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129508
* https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119284
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129706
After #128718 lands there will be two ways of performing a reversed
widened memory access, either by performing a consecutive unit-stride
access and a reverse, or a strided access with a negative stride.
Even though both produce a reversed vector, only the former needs
VPReverseVectorPointerRecipe which computes a pointer to the last
element of each part. A strided reverse still needs a pointer to the
first element of each part so it will use VPVectorPointerRecipe.
This renames VPReverseVectorPointerRecipe to VPVectorEndPointerRecipe to
clarify that a reversed access may not necessarily need a pointer to the
last element.
This is a copy of #126177, since it was automatically and permanently
closed because I messed up the source branch on my remote
This patch proposes to avoid converting widening recipes to VP
intrinsics during the EVL transform.
IIUC we initially did this to avoid `vl` toggles on RISC-V. However we
now have the RISCVVLOptimizer pass which mostly makes this redundant.
Emitting regular IR instead of VP intrinsics allows more generic
optimisations, both in the middle end and DAGCombiner, and we generally
have better patterns in the RISC-V backend for non-VP nodes. Sticking to
regular IR instructions is likely a lot less work than reimplementing
all of these optimisations for VP intrinsics, and on SPEC CPU 2017 we get
noticeably better code generation.
Nothing in VPlan.h directly depends on VPTransformState, VPCostContext,
VPFRange, VPlanPrinter or VPSlotTracker. Move them out to a separate
header to reduce the size of widely used VPlan.h.
This is a first step towards more cleanly separating declarations in
VPlan.
Besides reducing VPlan.h's size, this also allows including additional
VPlan-related headers in VPlanHelpers.h for use there. An example is
using VPDominatorTree in VPTransformState
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117138).
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124104
Tighten access to constructors similar to ef1260acc0. VPValues should
either be constructed by constructors of recipes defining them or should
be live-ins created by VPlan (via getOrAddLiveIn).
This relands the reverted #120721 with a fix for cases where neither
reduction operand are the reduction phi. Only
63114239cc8d26225a0ef9920baacfc7cc00fc58 and
63114239cc8d26225a0ef9920baacfc7cc00fc58 are new on top of the reverted
PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Guy <nicholas.guy@arm.com>
This re-lands the reverted #92418
When the VF is small enough so that dividing the VF by the scaling
factor results in 1, the reduction phi execution thinks the VF is scalar
and sets the reduction's output as a scalar value, tripping assertions
expecting a vector value. The latest commit in this PR fixes that by
using `State.VF` in the scalar check, rather than the divided VF.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Guy <nicholas.guy@arm.com>
Following on from https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94499, this
patch adds support to the Loop Vectorizer to emit the partial reduction
intrinsics where they may be beneficial for the target.
---------
Co-authored-by: Samuel Tebbs <samuel.tebbs@arm.com>
Introduce a general recipe to generate a scalar phi. Lower
VPCanonicalIVPHIRecipe and VPEVLBasedIVRecipe to VPScalarIVPHIrecipe
before plan execution, avoiding the need for duplicated ::execute
implementations. There are other cases that could benefit, including
in-loop reduction phis and pointer induction phis.
Builds on a similar idea as
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82270.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114305
Update VPlan to include the scalar loop header. This allows retiring
VPLiveOut, as the remaining live-outs can now be handled by adding
operands to the wrapped phis in the scalar loop header.
Note that the current version only includes the scalar loop header, no
other loop blocks and also does not wrap it in a region block.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109975
Refactors VPVectorPointerRecipe to use the VF VPValue to obtain the
runtime VF, similar to #95305.
Since only reverse vector pointers require the runtime VF, the patch
sets VPUnrollPart::PartOpIndex to 1 for vector pointers and 2 for
reverse vector pointers. As a result, the generation of reverse vector
pointers is moved into a separate recipe.
This patch splits off intrinsic hanlding to a new
VPWidenIntrinsicRecipe. VPWidenIntrinsicRecipes only need access to the
intrinsic ID to widen and the scalar result type (in case the intrinsic
is overloaded on the result type). It does not need access to an
underlying IR call instruction or function.
This means VPWidenIntrinsicRecipe can be created easily without access
to underlying IR.
Add a new VPIRInstruction recipe to wrap existing IR instructions not to
be modified during execution, execept for PHIs. For PHIs, a single
VPValue
operand is allowed, and it is used to add a new incoming value for the
single predecessor VPBB. Expect PHIs, VPIRInstructions cannot have any
operands.
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100658.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100735
The patch adds `VPWidenEVLRecipe` which represents `VPWidenRecipe` + EVL
argument. The new recipe replaces `VPWidenRecipe` in
`tryAddExplicitVectorLength` for each binary and unary operations.
Follow up patches will extend support for remaining cases, like `FCmp`
and `ICmp`
This patch implements limited loop vectorization support for the 'all-in-one' histogram intrinsic. The feature is disabled by default, and when enabled will only vectorize if there are no other users of values in the gather-modify-scatter sequence.
This reverts commit 6f538f6a2d3224efda985e9eb09012fa4275ea92.
A number of crashes have been fixed by separate fixes, including
ttps://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96622. This version of the
PR also pre-computes the costs for branches (except the latch) instead
of computing their costs as part of costing of replicate regions, as
there may not be a direct correspondence between original branches and
number of replicate regions.
Original message:
This adds a new interface to compute the cost of recipes, VPBasicBlocks,
VPRegionBlocks and VPlan, initially falling back to the legacy cost model
for all recipes. Follow-up patches will gradually migrate recipes to
compute their own costs step-by-step.
It also adds getBestPlan function to LVP which computes the cost of all
VPlans and picks the most profitable one together with the most
profitable VF.
The VPlan selected by the VPlan cost model is executed and there is an
assert to catch cases where the VPlan cost model and the legacy cost
model disagree. Even though I checked a number of different build
configurations on AArch64 and X86, there may be some differences
that have been missed.
Additional discussions and context can be found in @arcbbb's
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67647 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67934 which is an earlier
version of the current PR.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92555
This reverts commit 242cc200ccb24e22eaf54aed7b0b0c84cfc54c0b and
eea150c84053035163f307b46549a2997a343ce9, as it is causing a build bot
failure and there have been a number of crashes reported at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92555
This reverts commit 6f538f6a2d3224efda985e9eb09012fa4275ea92.
Extra tests for crashes discovered when building Chromium have been
added in fb86cb7ec157689e, 3be7312f81ad2.
Original message:
This adds a new interface to compute the cost of recipes, VPBasicBlocks,
VPRegionBlocks and VPlan, initially falling back to the legacy cost model
for all recipes. Follow-up patches will gradually migrate recipes to
compute their own costs step-by-step.
It also adds getBestPlan function to LVP which computes the cost of all
VPlans and picks the most profitable one together with the most
profitable VF.
The VPlan selected by the VPlan cost model is executed and there is an
assert to catch cases where the VPlan cost model and the legacy cost
model disagree. Even though I checked a number of different build
configurations on AArch64 and X86, there may be some differences
that have been missed.
Additional discussions and context can be found in @arcbbb's
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67647 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67934 which is an earlier
version of the current PR.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92555
This reverts commit 90fd99c0795711e1cf762a02b29b0a702f86a264.
This reverts commit 43e6f46936e177e47de6627a74b047ba27561b44.
Causes crashes, see comments on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92555.
This reverts commit 46080abe9b136821eda2a1a27d8a13ceac349f8c.
Extra tests have been added in 52d29eb287.
Original message:
This adds a new interface to compute the cost of recipes, VPBasicBlocks,
VPRegionBlocks and VPlan, initially falling back to the legacy cost model
for all recipes. Follow-up patches will gradually migrate recipes to
compute their own costs step-by-step.
It also adds getBestPlan function to LVP which computes the cost of all
VPlans and picks the most profitable one together with the most
profitable VF.
The VPlan selected by the VPlan cost model is executed and there is an
assert to catch cases where the VPlan cost model and the legacy cost
model disagree. Even though I checked a number of different build
configurations on AArch64 and X86, there may be some differences
that have been missed.
Additional discussions and context can be found in @arcbbb's
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67647 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67934 which is an earlier
version of the current PR.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92555
This adds a new interface to compute the cost of recipes, VPBasicBlocks,
VPRegionBlocks and VPlan, initially falling back to the legacy cost model
for all recipes. Follow-up patches will gradually migrate recipes to
compute their own costs step-by-step.
It also adds getBestPlan function to LVP which computes the cost of all
VPlans and picks the most profitable one together with the most
profitable VF.
The VPlan selected by the VPlan cost model is executed and there is an
assert to catch cases where the VPlan cost model and the legacy cost
model disagree. Even though I checked a number of different build
configurations on AArch64 and X86, there may be some differences
that have been missed.
Additional discussions and context can be found in @arcbbb's
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67647 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67934 which is an earlier
version of the current PR.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92555
Introduce new subclasses of VPWidenMemoryRecipe for VP
(vector-predicated) loads and stores to address multiple TODOs from
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76172
Note that the introduction of the new recipes also improves code-gen for
VP gather/scatters by removing the redundant header mask. With the new
approach, it is not sufficient to look at users of the widened canonical
IV to find all uses of the header mask.
In some cases, a widened IV is used instead of separately widening the
canonical IV. To handle that, first collect all VPValues representing header
masks (by looking at users of both the canonical IV and widened inductions
that are canonical) and then checking all users (recursively) of those header
masks.
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87411.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87816
This patch introduces a new VPWidenMemoryRecipe base class and distinct
sub-classes to model loads and stores.
This is a first step in an effort to simplify and modularize code
generation for widened loads and stores and enable adding further more
specialized memory recipes.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87411
This patch restructures the way names for printing VPValues are handled.
It moves the logic to generate names for printing to VPSlotTracker.
VPSlotTracker will now version names of the same underlying value if it
is used by multiple VPValues, by adding a .V suffix to the name.
This fixes cases where at the moment the same name is printed for
different VPValues.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81411
This patch introduces generating VP intrinsics in the Loop Vectorizer.
Currently the Loop Vectorizer supports vector predication in a very
limited capacity via tail-folding and masked load/store/gather/scatter
intrinsics. However, this does not let architectures with active vector
length predication support take advantage of their capabilities.
Architectures with general masked predication support also can only take
advantage of predication on memory operations. By having a way for the
Loop Vectorizer to generate Vector Predication intrinsics, which (will)
provide a target-independent way to model predicated vector
instructions. These architectures can make better use of their
predication capabilities.
Our first approach (implemented in this patch) builds on top of the
existing tail-folding mechanism in the LV (just adds a new tail-folding
mode using EVL), but instead of generating masked intrinsics for memory
operations it generates VP intrinsics for loads/stores instructions. The
patch adds a new VPlanTransforms to replace the wide header predicate
compare with EVL and updates codegen for load/stores to use VP
store/load with EVL.
Other important part of this approach is how the Explicit Vector Length
is computed. (VP intrinsics define this vector length parameter as
Explicit Vector Length (EVL)). We use an experimental intrinsic
`get_vector_length`, that can be lowered to architecture specific
instruction(s) to compute EVL.
Also, added a new recipe to emit instructions for computing EVL. Using
VPlan in this way will eventually help build and compare VPlans
corresponding to different strategies and alternatives.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99750
At the moment, some VPInstructions create only a single scalar value,
but use VPTransformatState's 'vector' storage for this value. Those
values are effectively uniform-per-VF (or in some cases
uniform-across-VF-and-UF). Using the vector/per-part storage doesn't
interact well with other recipes, that more accurately using (Part,
Lane) to look up scalar values and prevents VPInstructions creating
scalars from interacting with other recipes working with scalars.
This PR tries to unify handling of scalars by using (Part, 0) for scalar
values where only the first lane is demanded. This allows using
VPInstructions with other recipes like VPScalarCastRecipe and is also
needed when using VPInstructions in more cases otuside the vector loop
region to generate scalars.
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80269
Unify VPlan verifiers in verifyVPlanIsValid. This adds verification for
various properties on blocks to the verifier used for VPlans generated
by the inner loop vectorizer. It also adds def-use checks for the
verifier used in the VPlan native path.
This drops the separate flag to enable HCFG verification. Instead, all
VPlans are verified once they have been created, if assertions are
enabled.
This also removes VPWidenPHIRecipe from VPHeaderPHIRecipe; it is used to
model any phi node in the native path.
