23 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ivan Butygin
1f194ff34e
[mlir] Expose simplifyAffineExpr through python api (#133926) 2025-04-01 19:28:53 +03:00
Ivan Butygin
7c98cddc5a
[mlir] Expose AffineExpr.shift_dims/shift_symbols through C and Python bindings (#131521) 2025-03-16 19:57:56 +03:00
Peter Hawkins
5cd4274772
[mlir python] Port in-tree dialects to nanobind. (#119924)
This is a companion to #118583, although it can be landed independently
because since #117922 dialects do not have to use the same Python
binding framework as the Python core code.

This PR ports all of the in-tree dialect and pass extensions to
nanobind, with the exception of those that remain for testing pybind11
support.

This PR also:
* removes CollectDiagnosticsToStringScope from NanobindAdaptors.h. This
was overlooked in a previous PR and it is duplicated in Diagnostics.h.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jacques Pienaar <jpienaar@google.com>
2024-12-20 20:32:32 -08:00
Peter Hawkins
b56d1ec6cb
[mlir python] Port Python core code to nanobind. (#120473)
Relands #118583, with a fix for Python 3.8 compatibility. It was not
possible to set the buffer protocol accessers via slots in Python 3.8.

Why? https://nanobind.readthedocs.io/en/latest/why.html says it better
than I can, but my primary motivation for this change is to improve MLIR
IR construction time from JAX.

For a complicated Google-internal LLM model in JAX, this change improves
the MLIR
lowering time by around 5s (out of around 30s), which is a significant
speedup for simply switching binding frameworks.

To a large extent, this is a mechanical change, for instance changing
`pybind11::` to `nanobind::`.

Notes:
* this PR needs Nanobind 2.4.0, because it needs a bug fix
(https://github.com/wjakob/nanobind/pull/806) that landed in that
release.
* this PR does not port the in-tree dialect extension modules. They can
be ported in a future PR.
* I removed the py::sibling() annotations from def_static and def_class
in `PybindAdapters.h`. These ask pybind11 to try to form an overload
with an existing method, but it's not possible to form mixed
pybind11/nanobind overloads this ways and the parent class is now
defined in nanobind. Better solutions may be possible here.
* nanobind does not contain an exact equivalent of pybind11's buffer
protocol support. It was not hard to add a nanobind implementation of a
similar API.
* nanobind is pickier about casting to std::vector<bool>, expecting that
the input is a sequence of bool types, not truthy values. In a couple of
places I added code to support truthy values during casting.
* nanobind distinguishes bytes (`nb::bytes`) from strings (e.g.,
`std::string`). This required nb::bytes overloads in a few places.
2024-12-18 18:55:42 -08:00
Jacques Pienaar
6e8b3a3e0c Revert "[mlir python] Port Python core code to nanobind. (#118583)"
This reverts commit 41bd35b58bb482fd466aa4b13aa44a810ad6470f.

Breakage detected, rolling back.
2024-12-18 19:31:32 +00:00
Peter Hawkins
41bd35b58b
[mlir python] Port Python core code to nanobind. (#118583)
Why? https://nanobind.readthedocs.io/en/latest/why.html says it better
than I can, but my primary motivation for this change is to improve MLIR
IR construction time from JAX.

For a complicated Google-internal LLM model in JAX, this change improves
the MLIR
lowering time by around 5s (out of around 30s), which is a significant
speedup for simply switching binding frameworks.

To a large extent, this is a mechanical change, for instance changing
`pybind11::`
to `nanobind::`.

Notes:
* this PR needs Nanobind 2.4.0, because it needs a bug fix
(https://github.com/wjakob/nanobind/pull/806) that landed in that
release.
* this PR does not port the in-tree dialect extension modules. They can
be ported in a future PR.
* I removed the py::sibling() annotations from def_static and def_class
in `PybindAdapters.h`. These ask pybind11 to try to form an overload
with an existing method, but it's not possible to form mixed
pybind11/nanobind overloads this ways and the parent class is now
defined in nanobind. Better solutions may be possible here.
* nanobind does not contain an exact equivalent of pybind11's buffer
protocol support. It was not hard to add a nanobind implementation of a
similar API.
* nanobind is pickier about casting to std::vector<bool>, expecting that
the input is a sequence of bool types, not truthy values. In a couple of
places I added code to support truthy values during casting.
* nanobind distinguishes bytes (`nb::bytes`) from strings (e.g.,
`std::string`). This required nb::bytes overloads in a few places.
2024-12-18 11:16:11 -08:00
Mehdi Amini
285a229f20 [MLIR] Apply clang-tidy fixes for misc-include-cleaner (NFC) 2023-11-12 20:35:46 -08:00
max
4811270bac [MLIR][python bindings] use pybind C++ APIs for throwing python errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151167
2023-05-23 11:31:16 -05:00
Rahul Kayaith
e6d738e0c7 [mlir][python] Mark operator== overloads as const
This resolves some warnings when building with C++20, e.g.:
```
llvm-project/mlir/lib/Bindings/Python/IRAffine.cpp:545:60: warning: ISO C++20 considers use of overloaded operator '==' (with operand types 'mlir::python::PyAffineExpr' and 'mlir::python::PyAffineExpr') to be ambiguous despite there being a unique best viable function [-Wambiguous-reversed-operator]
                        PyAffineExpr &other) { return self == other; })
                                                      ~~~~ ^  ~~~~~
llvm-project/mlir/lib/Bindings/Python/IRAffine.cpp:350:20: note: ambiguity is between a regular call to this operator and a call with the argument order reversed
bool PyAffineExpr::operator==(const PyAffineExpr &other) {
                   ^
```

Reviewed By: ftynse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147018
2023-03-28 11:06:13 -04:00
Benjamin Kramer
2233c4dc70 [mlir] Add operator!= to WalkResult, for completeness. 2022-12-19 23:39:13 +01:00
Alex Zinenko
ee168fb90e [mlir][python] Fix issues with block argument slices
The type extraction helper function for block argument and op result
list objects was ignoring the slice entirely. So was the slice addition.
Both are caused by a misleading naming convention to implement slices
via CRTP. Make the convention more explicit and hide the helper
functions so users have harder time calling them directly.

Closes #56540.

Reviewed By: stellaraccident

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130271
2022-07-21 14:41:12 +00:00
Mehdi Amini
337c937ddb Apply clang-tidy fixes for performance-move-const-arg to MLIR (NFC) 2022-01-02 22:36:56 +00:00
Mehdi Amini
1fc096af1e Apply clang-tidy fixes for performance-unnecessary-value-param to MLIR (NFC)
Reviewed By: Mogball

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116250
2022-01-02 01:45:18 +00:00
Mehdi Amini
e5639b3fa4 Fix more clang-tidy cleanups in mlir/ (NFC) 2021-12-22 20:53:11 +00:00
Mehdi Amini
be0a7e9f27 Adjust "end namespace" comment in MLIR to match new agree'd coding style
See D115115 and this mailing list discussion:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-December/154199.html

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115309
2021-12-08 06:05:26 +00:00
Stella Laurenzo
a6e7d024a9 [mlir][python] Add pyi stub files to enable auto completion.
There is no completely automated facility for generating stubs that are both accurate and comprehensive for native modules. After some experimentation, I found that MyPy's stubgen does the best at generating correct stubs with a few caveats that are relatively easy to fix:
  * Some types resolve to cross module symbols incorrectly.
  * staticmethod and classmethod signatures seem to always be completely generic and need to be manually provided.
  * It does not generate an __all__ which, from testing, causes namespace pollution to be visible to IDE code completion.

As a first step, I did the following:
  * Ran `stubgen` for `_mlir.ir`, `_mlir.passmanager`, and `_mlirExecutionEngine`.
  * Manually looked for all instances where unnamed arguments were being emitted (i.e. as 'arg0', etc) and updated the C++ side to include names (and re-ran stubgen to get a good initial state).
  * Made/noted a few structural changes to each `pyi` file to make it minimally functional.
  * Added the `pyi` files to the CMake rules so they are installed and visible.

To test, I added a `.env` file to the root of the project with `PYTHONPATH=...` set as per instructions. Then reload the developer window (in VsCode) and verify that completion works for various changes to test cases.

There are still a number of overly generic signatures, but I want to check in this low-touch baseline before iterating on more ambiguous changes. This is already a big improvement.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114679
2021-11-29 19:58:58 -08:00
Alex Zinenko
fc7594cc4a [mlir][python] improve usability of Python affine construct bindings
- Provide the operator overloads for constructing (semi-)affine expressions in
  Python by combining existing expressions with constants.
- Make AffineExpr, AffineMap and IntegerSet hashable in Python.
- Expose the AffineExpr composition functionality.

Reviewed By: gysit, aoyal

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113010
2021-11-03 10:48:01 +01:00
Mehdi Amini
e2f16be599 Fix clang-tidy warnings in MLIR Python bindings (NFC) 2021-10-19 17:15:20 +00:00
Alex Zinenko
78f2dae00d [mlir][python] Provide some methods and properties for API completeness
When writing the user-facing documentation, I noticed several inconsistencies
and asymmetries in the Python API we provide. Fix them by adding:

- the `owner` property to regions, similarly to blocks;
- the `isinstance` method to any class derived from `PyConcreteAttr`,
  `PyConcreteValue` and `PyConreteAffineExpr`, similar to `PyConcreteType` to
  enable `isa`-like calls without having to handle exceptions;
- a mechanism to create the first block in the region as we could only create
  blocks relative to other blocks, with is impossible in an empty region.

Reviewed By: gysit

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111556
2021-10-13 14:30:55 +02:00
Stella Laurenzo
f05ff4f757 [mlir][python] Apply py::module_local() to all classes.
* This allows multiple MLIR-API embedding downstreams to co-exist in the same process.
* I believe this is the last thing needed to enable isolated embedding.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108605
2021-08-30 22:18:43 -07:00
Tobias Gysi
31f888ea9a [mlir][linalg][python] Add attribute support to the OpDSL.
Extend the OpDSL with index attributes. After tensors and scalars, index attributes are the third operand type. An index attribute represents a compile-time constant that is limited to index expressions. A use cases are the strides and dilations defined by convolution and pooling operations.

The patch only updates the OpDSL. The C++ yaml codegen is updated by a followup patch.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104711
2021-06-24 09:40:32 +00:00
Nicolas Vasilache
335d2df533 [mlir][Python][Linalg] Add missing attributes to linalg ops
This revision tightens up the handling of attributes for both named
and generic linalg ops.
To demonstrate the IR validity, a working e2e Linalg example is added.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99430
2021-04-01 08:16:50 +00:00
Stella Laurenzo
436c6c9c20 NFC: Break up the mlir python bindings into individual sources.
* IRModules.cpp -> (IRCore.cpp, IRAffine.cpp, IRAttributes.cpp, IRTypes.cpp).
* The individual pieces now compile in the 5-15s range whereas IRModules.cpp was starting to approach a minute (didn't capture a before time).
* More fine grained splitting is possible, but this represents the most obvious.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98978
2021-03-19 13:33:51 -07:00