332 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alexander Richardson
3a4b351ba1
[IR] Introduce the ptrtoaddr instruction
This introduces a new `ptrtoaddr` instruction which is similar to
`ptrtoint` but has two differences:

1) Unlike `ptrtoint`, `ptrtoaddr` does not capture provenance
2) `ptrtoaddr` only extracts (and then extends/truncates) the low
   index-width bits of the pointer

For most architectures, difference 2) does not matter since index (address)
width and pointer representation width are the same, but this does make a
difference for architectures that have pointers that aren't just plain
integer addresses such as AMDGPU fat pointers or CHERI capabilities.

This commit introduces textual and bitcode IR support as well as basic code
generation, but optimization passes do not handle the new instruction yet
so it may result in worse code than using ptrtoint. Follow-up changes will
update capture tracking, etc. for the new instruction.

RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/clarifiying-the-semantics-of-ptrtoint/83987/54

Reviewed By: nikic

Pull Request: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139357
2025-08-08 10:12:39 -07:00
Luke Lau
64106581b9
[Constant] Make Constant::getSplatValue return poison on poison (#141870)
This is a follow up from #141845. 

TargetTransformInfo::getOperandInfo needs to be updated to check for
undef values as otherwise a splat is considered a constant, and some
RISC-V cost model tests will start adding a cost to materialize the
constant.
2025-05-29 15:01:28 +01:00
Luke Lau
79ae407c95
[ConstantFolding] Fold intrinsics of scalable vectors with splatted operands (#141845)
As noted in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141821#issuecomment-2917328924,
whilst we currently constant fold intrinsics of fixed-length vectors via
their scalar counterpart, we don't do the same for scalable vectors.

This handles the scalable vector case when the operands are splats.

One weird snag in ConstantVector::getSplat was that it produced a undef
if passed in poison, so this also contains a fix by checking for
PoisonValue before UndefValue.
2025-05-28 23:29:41 +01:00
Kazu Hirata
89308de4b0
[llvm] Value-initialize values with *Map::try_emplace (NFC) (#141522)
try_emplace value-initializes values, so we do not need to pass
nullptr to try_emplace when the value types are raw pointers or
std::unique_ptr<T>.
2025-05-26 15:13:02 -07:00
Nikita Popov
7f5c34bc5e
[IR] Replace blockaddress refcount with single flag (#138239)
BasicBlock currently has a blockaddress refcount. However,
blockaddresses are uniqued, which means that there can only be a single
blockaddress for a given BasicBlock. Prior to #137958 there were some
edge case exceptions to this, but now it always holds. As such, replace
the refcount with a single flag.

As we're now just tracking two bits, I've dropped the BasicBlockBits
structure, as I found it more annoying than useful (esp with the weird
AIX workarounds). Instead handle the subclass data the same way we do in
Operators.
2025-05-02 13:03:43 +02:00
Nikita Popov
4109bac330
[IR] Do not store Function inside BlockAddress (#137958)
Currently BlockAddresses store both the Function and the BasicBlock they
reference, and the BlockAddress is part of the use list of both the
Function and BasicBlock.

This is quite awkward, because this is not really a use of the function
itself (and walks of function uses generally skip block addresses for
that reason). This also has weird implications on function RAUW (as that
will replace the function in block addresses in a way that generally
doesn't make sense), and causes other peculiar issues, like the ability
to have multiple block addresses for one block (with different
functions).

Instead, I believe it makes more sense to specify only the basic block
and let the function be implied by the BB parent. This does mean that we
may have block addresses without a function (if the BB is not inserted),
but this should only happen during IR construction.
2025-05-02 09:40:50 +02:00
pzzp
d6a2cca77e
[llvm:ir] Add support for constant data exceeding 4GiB (#126481)
The test file is over 4GiB, which is too big, so I didn’t submit it.
2025-03-21 11:44:01 -07:00
Kees Cook
ea2e66aa8b
[LLVM][ConstantFold] Undefined values are not constant (#130713)
llvm.is.constant (and therefore Clang's __builtin_constant_p()) need to
report undefined values as non-constant or future DCE choices end up
making no sense. This was encountered while building the Linux kernel
which uses __builtin_constant_p() while trying to evaluate if it is safe
to use a compile-time constant resolution for string lengths or if it
must kick over to a full runtime call to strlen(). Obviously an
undefined variable cannot be known at compile-time, so
__builtin_constant_p() needs to return false. This change will also mean
that Clang will match GCC's behavior under the same conditions.

Fixes #130649
2025-03-12 09:50:50 -07:00
Nikita Popov
d8b2e432d6
[IR] Remove mul constant expression (#127046)
Remove support for the mul constant expression, which has previously
already been marked as undesirable. This removes the APIs to create mul
expressions and updates tests to stop using mul expressions.

Part of:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179
2025-02-14 09:28:57 +01:00
Nikita Popov
b7baf2ee8d [IR] Mark mul constant expression as undesirable
This is a (very belated) reland of 0a362f12ec60a49a054befec8620a8e69523af54,
which I originally reverted due to flang test failures.

This marks mul constant expressions as undesirable, which means that
we will no longer create them by default, but they can still be
created explicitly.

Part of:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179
2025-02-13 10:27:36 +01:00
Mats Jun Larsen
d7c14c8f97
[IR] Replace of PointerType::getUnqual(Type) with opaque version (NFC) (#123909)
Follow up to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/123569
2025-01-23 18:23:05 +09:00
Paul Walker
3146911eb0
[LLVM][AsmPrinter] Add vector ConstantInt/FP support to emitGlobalConstantImpl. (#120077)
The fixes a failure path for fixed length vector globals when
ConstantInt/FP is used to represent splats instead of
ConstantDataVector.
2024-12-18 11:51:01 +00:00
Paul Walker
02328e0465
[LLVM][ConstantFold] Remove remaining uses of ConstantInt/FP::get(LLVMContext... (#119912)
This extends the constant folds to support vector ConstantInt/FP.
2024-12-16 11:37:50 +00:00
Paul Walker
4872ecf1cc
[LLVM][IR] Teach extractelement folds about constant ConstantInt/FP. (#116793) 2024-11-21 12:39:53 +00:00
Paul Walker
97298853b4
[LLVM][IR] Teach constant integer binop folds about vector ConstantInts. (#115739)
The existing logic mostly works with the main changes being:
 * Use getScalarSizeInBits instead of IntegerType::getBitWidth
 * Use ConstantInt::get(Type* instead of ConstantInt::get(LLVMContext
2024-11-13 12:33:56 +00:00
Nikita Popov
255a99c29f
[APInt] Fix APInt constructions where value does not fit bitwidth (NFCI) (#80309)
This fixes all the places that hit the new assertion added in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106524 in tests. That is,
cases where the value passed to the APInt constructor is not an N-bit
signed/unsigned integer, where N is the bit width and signedness is
determined by the isSigned flag.

The fixes either set the correct value for isSigned, set the
implicitTrunc flag, or perform more calculations inside APInt.

Note that the assertion is currently still disabled by default, so this
patch is mostly NFC.
2024-10-17 08:48:08 +02:00
eric-xtang1008
a59e5d8115
[ConstantFold][RFC] Add AllowLHSConstant parameter in getBinOpAbsorber (#109736)
Add a AllowLHSConstant parameter in getBinOpAbsorber function for
supporting more binary operators.
2024-10-01 14:51:01 +02:00
Jay Foad
e03f427196
[LLVM] Use {} instead of std::nullopt to initialize empty ArrayRef (#109133)
It is almost always simpler to use {} instead of std::nullopt to
initialize an empty ArrayRef. This patch changes all occurrences I could
find in LLVM itself. In future the ArrayRef(std::nullopt_t) constructor
could be deprecated or removed.
2024-09-19 16:16:38 +01:00
Daniel Paoliello
e3f936eb75
Don't rely on undefined behavior to store how a User object's allocation is laid out (#105714)
In `User::operator new` a single allocation is created to store the
`User` object itself, "intrusive" operands or a pointer for "hung off"
operands, and the descriptor. After allocation, details about the layout
(number of operands, how the operands are stored, if there is a
descriptor) are stored in the `User` object by settings its fields. The
`Value` and `User` constructors are then very careful not to initialize
these fields so that the values set during allocation can be
subsequently read. However, when the `User` object is returned from
`operator new` [its value is technically "indeterminate" and so reading
a field without first initializing it is undefined behavior (and will be
erroneous in
C++26)](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/default_initialization#Indeterminate_and_erroneous_values).

We discovered this issue when trying to build LLVM using MSVC's [`/sdl`
flag](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/reference/sdl-enable-additional-security-checks?view=msvc-170)
which clears class fields after allocation (the docs say that this
feature shouldn't be turned on for custom allocators and should only
clear pointers, but that doesn't seem to match the implementation).
MSVC's behavior both with and without the `/sdl` flag is standards
conforming since a program is supposed to initialize storage before
reading from it, thus the compiler implementation changing any values
will never be observed in a well-formed program. The standard also
provides no provisions for making storage bytes not indeterminate by
setting them during allocation or `operator new`.

The fix for this is to create a set of types that encode the layout and
provide these to both `operator new` and the constructor:
* The `AllocMarker` types are used to select which `operator new` to
use.
* `AllocMarker` can then be implicitly converted to a `AllocInfo` which
tells the constructor how the type was laid out.
2024-09-11 11:34:26 -07:00
Kazu Hirata
b8f1505136
[IR] Use a range-based for loop (NFC) (#105826) 2024-08-23 08:45:19 -07:00
Daniil Kovalev
6e45fa95be
[PAC][AArch64] Support init/fini array signing (#96478)
If both `-fptrauth-init-fini` and `-fptrauth-calls` are passed, sign
function pointers in `llvm.global_ctors` and `llvm.global_dtors` with
constant discriminator 0xD9D4
(`ptrauth_string_discriminator("init_fini")`). Additionally, if
`-fptrauth-init-fini-address-discrimination` is passed, address
discrimination is used for signing (otherwise, just constant
discriminator is used).

For address discrimination, we use it's special form since uses of
`llvm.global_{c|d}tors` are disallowed (see
`Verifier::visitGlobalVariable`) and we can't emit `getelementptr`
expressions referencing these special arrays. A signed ctor/dtor pointer
with special address discrimination applied looks like the following:

```
ptr ptrauth (ptr @foo, i32 0, i64 55764, ptr inttoptr (i64 1 to ptr))
```
2024-08-06 08:02:13 +03:00
Nikita Popov
d177a94fbd [IR] Add Constant::toConstantRange() (NFC)
The logic in llvm::getVectorConstantRange() can be a bit
inconvenient to use in some cases because of the need to handle
the scalar case separately. Generalize it to handle all constants,
and move it to live directly on Constant.
2024-07-05 16:51:49 +02:00
Nikita Popov
76d3ab2cc3
[IR] Remove support for shl constant expressions (#96037)
Remove support for shl constant expressions, as part of:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179
2024-06-20 08:59:29 +02:00
Nikita Popov
6c01011db0
[IR] Mark shl constant expression as undesirable (#95940)
Mark shl constant expressions undesirable, so that they are no longer
automatically created by IRBuilder, constant folding, etc.

This is in preparation for removing them entirely.
2024-06-19 09:10:28 +02:00
Nikita Popov
cc2dc0916a Reapply [ConstantFold] Drop gep of gep fold entirely (#95126)
Reapplying without changes. The flang+openmp buildbot failure
should be addressed by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94541.

-----

This is a followup to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93823
and drops the DataLayout-unaware GEP of GEP fold entirely. All cases are
now left to the DataLayout-aware constant folder, which will fold
everything to a single i8 GEP.

We didn't have any test coverage for this fold in LLVM, but some Clang
tests change.
2024-06-13 17:03:35 +02:00
Nikita Popov
cece0a105b Revert "[ConstantFold] Drop gep of gep fold entirely (#95126)"
This reverts commit 3b3b839c66dc49674fd6646650525a2173030690.

This broke the flang+openmp+offload buildbot, as reported in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95126#issuecomment-2162424019.
2024-06-12 11:52:12 +02:00
Nikita Popov
3b3b839c66
[ConstantFold] Drop gep of gep fold entirely (#95126)
This is a followup to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93823
and drops the DataLayout-unaware GEP of GEP fold entirely. All cases are
now left to the DataLayout-aware constant folder, which will fold
everything to a single i8 GEP.

We didn't have any test coverage for this fold in LLVM, but some Clang
tests change.
2024-06-12 09:50:14 +02:00
Nikita Popov
e57308b063 [IR] Accept GEPNoWrapFlags in creation APIs
Add overloads of GetElementPtrInst::Create() that accept
GEPNoWrapFlags, and switch the bool parameters in IRBuilder to
accept it instead as well.

As a sample use, switch GEP i8 canonicalization in InstCombine to
preserve the original flags.
2024-06-04 14:08:33 +02:00
Nikita Popov
deab451e7a
[IR] Remove support for icmp and fcmp constant expressions (#93038)
Remove support for the icmp and fcmp constant expressions.

This is part of:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179

As usual, many of the updated tests will no longer test what they were
originally intended to -- this is hard to preserve when constant
expressions get removed, and in many cases just impossible as the
existence of a specific kind of constant expression was the cause of the
issue in the first place.
2024-06-04 08:31:03 +02:00
Nikita Popov
6ee845d240 [IR] Remove handling for removed ConstantExprs (NFC) 2024-05-31 15:03:22 +02:00
Ahmed Bougacha
0edc97f119
[IR][AArch64][PAC] Add "ptrauth(...)" Constant to represent signed pointers. (#85738)
This defines a new kind of IR Constant that represents a ptrauth signed
pointer, as used in AArch64 PAuth.

It allows representing most kinds of signed pointer constants used thus
far in the llvm ptrauth implementations, notably those used in the
Darwin and ELF ABIs being implemented for c/c++.  These signed pointer
constants are then lowered to ELF/MachO relocations.

These can be simply thought of as a constant `llvm.ptrauth.sign`, with
the interesting addition of discriminator computation: the `ptrauth`
constant can also represent a combined blend, when both address and
integer discriminator operands are used.  Both operands are otherwise
optional, with default values 0/null.
2024-05-28 16:39:09 -07:00
Nikita Popov
8cdecd4d3a
[IR] Add getelementptr nusw and nuw flags (#90824)
This implements the `nusw` and `nuw` flags for `getelementptr` as
proposed at
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-add-nusw-and-nuw-flags-for-getelementptr/78672.

The three possible flags are encapsulated in the new `GEPNoWrapFlags`
class. Currently this class has a ctor from bool, interpreted as the
InBounds flag. This ctor should be removed in the future, as code gets
migrated to handle all flags.

There are a few places annotated with `TODO(gep_nowrap)`, where I've had
to touch code but opted to not infer or precisely preserve the new
flags, so as to keep this as NFC as possible and make sure any changes
of that kind get test coverage when they are made.
2024-05-27 16:05:17 +02:00
Eli Friedman
f893dccbba
Replace uses of ConstantExpr::getCompare. (#91558)
Use ICmpInst::compare() where possible, ConstantFoldCompareInstOperands
in other places. This only changes places where the either the fold is
guaranteed to succeed, or the code doesn't use the resulting compare if
we fail to fold.
2024-05-09 16:50:01 -07:00
Nikita Popov
1baa385065
[IR][PatternMatch] Only accept poison in getSplatValue() (#89159)
In #88217 a large set of matchers was changed to only accept poison
values in splats, but not undef values. This is because we now use
poison for non-demanded vector elements, and allowing undef can cause
correctness issues.

This patch covers the remaining matchers by changing the AllowUndef
parameter of getSplatValue() to AllowPoison instead. We also carry out
corresponding renames in matchers.

As a followup, we may want to change the default for things like m_APInt
to m_APIntAllowPoison (as this is much less risky when only allowing
poison), but this change doesn't do that.

There is one caveat here: We have a single place
(X86FixupVectorConstants) which does require handling of vector splats
with undefs. This is because this works on backend constant pool
entries, which currently still use undef instead of poison for
non-demanded elements (because SDAG as a whole does not have an explicit
poison representation). As it's just the single use, I've open-coded a
getSplatValueAllowUndef() helper there, to discourage use in any other
places.
2024-04-18 15:44:12 +09:00
Nikita Popov
d9a5aa8e2d
[PatternMatch] Do not accept undef elements in m_AllOnes() and friends (#88217)
Change all the cstval_pred_ty based PatternMatch helpers (things like
m_AllOnes and m_Zero) to only allow poison elements inside vector
splats, not undef elements.

Historically, we used to represent non-demanded elements in vectors
using undef. Nowadays, we use poison instead. As such, I believe that
support for undef in vector splats is no longer useful.

At the same time, while poison splat elements are pretty much always
safe to ignore, this is not generally the case for undef elements. We
have existing miscompiles in our tests due to this (see the
masked-merge-*.ll tests changed here) and it's easy to miss such cases
in the future, now that we write tests using poison instead of undef
elements.

I think overall, keeping support for undef elements no longer makes
sense, and we should drop it. Once this is done consistently, I think we
may also consider allowing poison in m_APInt by default, as doing that
change is much less risky than doing the same with undef.

This change involves a substantial amount of test changes. For most
tests, I've just replaced undef with poison, as I don't think there is
value in retaining both. For some tests (where the distinction between
undef and poison is important), I've duplicated tests.
2024-04-17 18:22:05 +09:00
Yingwei Zheng
caa2258250
[LLVM] Remove nuw neg (#86295)
This patch removes APIs that creating NUW neg. It is a trivial case
because `sub nuw 0, X` always gets simplified into zero.
I believe there is no optimization opportunities in the real-world
applications that we can take advantage of the nuw flag.

Motivated by
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84792#discussion_r1524891134.

Compile-time improvement:
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=d1f182c895728d89c5c3d198b133e212a5d9d4a3&to=da7b7478b7cbb32c09d760f6b8d0e67901e0d533&stat=instructions:u
2024-03-26 20:56:16 +08:00
Nikita Popov
0f46e31cfb
[IR] Change representation of getelementptr inrange (#84341)
As part of the migration to ptradd
(https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-replacing-getelementptr-with-ptradd/68699),
we need to change the representation of the `inrange` attribute, which
is used for vtable splitting.

Currently, inrange is specified as follows:

```
getelementptr inbounds ({ [4 x ptr], [4 x ptr] }, ptr @vt, i64 0, inrange i32 1, i64 2)
```

The `inrange` is placed on a GEP index, and all accesses must be "in
range" of that index. The new representation is as follows:

```
getelementptr inbounds inrange(-16, 16) ({ [4 x ptr], [4 x ptr] }, ptr @vt, i64 0, i32 1, i64 2)
```

This specifies which offsets are "in range" of the GEP result. The new
representation will continue working when canonicalizing to ptradd
representation:

```
getelementptr inbounds inrange(-16, 16) (i8, ptr @vt, i64 48)
```

The inrange offsets are relative to the return value of the GEP. An
alternative design could make them relative to the source pointer
instead. The result-relative format was chosen on the off-chance that we
want to extend support to non-constant GEPs in the future, in which case
this variant is more expressive.

This implementation "upgrades" the old inrange representation in bitcode
by simply dropping it. This is a very niche feature, and I don't think
trying to upgrade it is worthwhile. Let me know if you disagree.
2024-03-20 10:59:45 +01:00
Stephen Tozer
9a96fb4445 Reapply "[NFC][RemoveDIs] Switch ConstantExpr::getAsInstruction to not insert (#84737)"
Fixes a build error caused by an unupdated getAsInstruction callsite in clang.

This reverts commit ab851f7fe946e7eed700ef9d82082eb721860189.
2024-03-19 15:49:10 +00:00
Stephen Tozer
ab851f7fe9 Revert "[NFC][RemoveDIs] Switch ConstantExpr::getAsInstruction to not insert (#84737)"
Reverted due to buildbot failures:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/139/builds/61717/

This reverts commit 7ef433f62c199c414bffdcac1c8ee3159b29c5f5.
2024-03-19 14:41:27 +00:00
Jeremy Morse
7ef433f62c
[NFC][RemoveDIs] Switch ConstantExpr::getAsInstruction to not insert (#84737)
Because the RemoveDIs work is putting a debug-info bit into
BasicBlock::iterator and iterators are needed for insertion, the
getAsInstruction method declaration would need to use a fully defined
instruction-iterator, which leads to a complicated
header-inclusion-order problem. Much simpler to instead just not insert,
and make it the callers problem to insert.

This is proportionate because there are only four call-sites to
getAsInstruction -- it would suck if we did this everywhere.

---------

Merged by: Stephen Tozer <stephen.tozer@sony.com>
2024-03-19 14:30:41 +00:00
Paul Walker
cbb24e139d
[LLVM][IR] Add native vector support to ConstantInt & ConstantFP. (#74502)
NOTE: For brevity the following talks about ConstantInt but
everything extends to cover ConstantFP as well.

Whilst ConstantInt::get() supports the creation of vectors whereby
each lane has the same value, it achieves this via other constants:

  * ConstantVector for fixed-length vectors
  * ConstantExprs for scalable vectors

However, ConstantExprs are being deprecated and ConstantVector is
not space efficient for larger vector types. By extending ConstantInt
we can represent vector splats by only storing the underlying scalar
value.

More specifically:

 * ConstantInt gains an ElementCount variant of get().
 * LLVMContext is extended to map <EC,APInt>->ConstantInt.
 * BitcodeReader/Writer support is extended to allow vector types.

Whilst this patch adds the base support, more work is required
before it's production ready. For example, there's likely to be
many places where isa<ConstantInt> assumes a scalar type. Accordingly
the default behaviour of ConstantInt::get() remains unchanged but a
set of flags are added to allow wider testing and thus help with the
migration:

  --use-constant-int-for-fixed-length-splat
  --use-constant-fp-for-fixed-length-splat
  --use-constant-int-for-scalable-splat
  --use-constant-fp-for-scalable-splat

NOTE: No change is required to the bitcode format because types and
values are handled separately.

NOTE: For similar reasons as above, code generation doesn't work
out-the-box.
2024-02-22 14:07:16 +00:00
Joshua Cao
72ffaa9156
[IR][TRE] Support associative intrinsics (#74226)
There is support for intrinsics in Instruction::isCommunative, but there
is no equivalent implementation for isAssociative. This patch builds
support for associative intrinsics with TRE as an application. TRE can
now have associative intrinsics as an accumulator. For example:
```
struct Node {
  Node *next;
  unsigned val;
}

unsigned maxval(struct Node *n) {
  if (!n) return 0;
  return std::max(n->val, maxval(n->next));
}
```
Can be transformed into:
```
unsigned maxval(struct Node *n) {
  struct Node *head = n;
  unsigned max = 0; // Identity of unsigned std::max
  while (true) {
    if (!head) return max;
    max = std::max(max, head->val);
    head = head->next;
  }
  return max;
}
```
This example results in about 5x speedup in local runs.

We conservatively only consider min/max and as associative for this
patch to limit testing scope. There are probably other intrinsics that
could be considered associative. There are a few consumers of
isAssociative() that could be impacted. Testing has only required to
Reassociate pass be updated.
2023-12-04 22:35:59 -08:00
Nikita Popov
56c1d30183
[IR] Remove support for lshr/ashr constant expressions (#71955)
Remove support for the lshr and ashr constant expressions. All places
creating them have been removed beforehand, so this just removes the
APIs and uses of these constant expressions in tests.

This is part of
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179.
2023-11-14 09:25:14 +01:00
Shoaib Meenai
c5dd1bbcc3 Revert "Revert "[IR] Mark lshr and ashr constant expressions as undesirable""
This reverts commit 8ee07a4be7f7d8654ecf25e7ce0a680975649544.

The revert is breaking AMDGPU backend tests (which I didn't have
enabled), and I don't want to risk breakages over the weekend, so just
revert for now.
2023-11-10 17:26:14 -08:00
Shoaib Meenai
8ee07a4be7 Revert "[IR] Mark lshr and ashr constant expressions as undesirable"
This reverts commit 82f68a992b9f89036042d57a5f6345cb2925b2c1.

cd7ba9f3d090afb5d3b15b0dcf379d15d1e11e33 needs to be reverted to fix
test failures on builds without assertions, and this one needs to be
reverted first for that.
2023-11-10 17:08:35 -08:00
Nikita Popov
82f68a992b [IR] Mark lshr and ashr constant expressions as undesirable
These will no longer be created by default during constant folding.
2023-11-10 16:29:13 +01:00
Nikita Popov
c82cc62387 Revert "[IR] Mark mul and ashr const exprs as undesirable"
This reverts commit 0a362f12ec60a49a054befec8620a8e69523af54.

This causes test failures in flang.
2023-11-07 11:16:10 +01:00
Nikita Popov
0a362f12ec [IR] Mark mul and ashr const exprs as undesirable
These will no longer be created by default, but can still be
created explicitly.
2023-11-07 10:42:14 +01:00
Nikita Popov
17764d2c87
[IR] Remove FP cast constant expressions (#71408)
Remove support for the fptrunc, fpext, fptoui, fptosi, uitofp and sitofp
constant expressions. All places creating them have been removed
beforehand, so this just removes the APIs and uses of these constant
expressions in tests.

With this, the only remaining FP operation that still has constant
expression support is fcmp.

This is part of
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179.
2023-11-07 09:34:16 +01:00
Nikita Popov
3a12f355ab [IR] Mark FP casts constant exprs as undesirable
We will no longer generate these constant expressions by default,
but they can still be explicitly created.
2023-11-06 16:04:32 +01:00