`common_reference` isn't an exception for [meta.rqmts]/4, so it's better
to disallow users to specialize it.
`indirectly_readable.compile.pass.cpp` was a bit problematic. It
attempted to opt-out common reference type in some wrong ways. Also, the
standard effectively forbids opting-out common reference type for `T&`
and `T&&`. This patch removes and adjusts some problematic cases.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nikolas Klauser <nikolasklauser@berlin.de>
This patch adds a large number of missing includes in the libc++ headers
and the test suite. Those were found as part of the effort to move
towards a mostly monolithic top-level std module.
This patch implements https://wg21.link/p2609r3.
The test code was originally authored by JMazurkiewicz.
Notes:
- P2609R3 is not officially a Defect Report, but MSVC STL
implements it in C++20 mode.
Moreover, P2609R3 and P2997R1 touch exactly the same set of
concepts, and MSVC STL and libc++ have already treated P2997R1
as a DR.
- This patch also adjusted feature-test macros.
+ In C++20 mode, the value of __cpp_lib_ranges should be `202110L` because
- `202202L` covers `range_adaptor_closure` (P2387R3), and
- `202207L` covers move-only types in range adaptors (P2494R2).
And all of these changes are only available since C++23 mode.
+ In C++23 mode, the value should be `202406L` because
- `202211L` covers removing poison overloads (P2602R2),
- `202302L` covers relaxing projected value types (P2609R3), and
- `202406L` covers removing requirements on `iter_common_reference_t` (P2997R1).
And all of these changes are already or being implemented.
Fixes#105253.
Co-authored-by: Jakub Mazurkiewicz <mazkuba3@gmail.com>
I noticed that these tests had empty `main` functions. Dropping them and
renaming the tests to `MEOW.compile.pass.cpp` will slightly improve test
throughput.
Notable things in this commit:
* refactors `__indirect_binary_left_foldable`, making it slightly
different (but equivalent) to _`indirect-binary-left-foldable`_, which
improves readability (a [patch to the Working Paper][patch] was made)
* omits `__cpo` namespace, since it is not required for implementing
niebloids (a cleanup should happen in 2024)
* puts tests ensuring invocable robustness and dangling correctness
inside the correctness testing to ensure that the algorithms' results
are still correct
[patch]: https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/pull/6734
Found while running libc++'s test suite with MSVC's STL.
* I've filed [LWG-4021](https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue4021)
"`mdspan::is_always_meow()` should be `noexcept`" and implemented this
in libc++'s product and test code.
* Use `LIBCPP_STATIC_ASSERT` to avoid issues with `noexcept`
strengthening in MSVC's STL.
+ As permitted by the Standard, MSVC's STL conditionally strengthens
`mdspan` construction/`is_meow`/`stride` and `elements_view` iterator
`base() &&`, and always strengthens `basic_stringbuf` `swap`.
+ In `mdspan/properties.pass.cpp`, this also upgrades runtime `assert`s
to `static_assert`s.
* Improvement: Upgrade `assert` to `static_assert` when inspecting the
`noexcept`ness of `std::ranges::iter_move`. (These `!noexcept` tests
weren't causing issues for MSVC's STL, so I didn't change them to be
libc++-specific.)
Notice that because Holder<Incomplete> is _possible_ to complete, but
_unsafe_ to complete, that means that Holder<Incomplete>* is basically
not an iterator and it's not even safe to ask if
input_iterator<Holder<Incomplete>*> because that _will_ necessarily
complete the type. So it's totally expected that we still cannot safely
ask e.g.
static_assert(std::indirect_unary_predicate<bool(&)(Holder<Incomplete>&),
Holder<Incomplete>*>);
or even
static_assert(!std::indirect_unary_predicate<int, Holder<Incomplete>*>);
This was originally uploaded as https://reviews.llvm.org/D119029 and I
picked it up here as part of the Github PR transition.
Co-authored-by: Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer@gmail.com>
We pretty consistently don't define those cause they are not needed,
and it removes the potential pitfall to think that these tests are
being run. This doesn't touch .compile.fail.cpp tests since those
should be replaced by .verify.cpp tests anyway, and there would be
a lot to fix up.
As a fly-by, I also fixed a bit of formatting, removed a few unused
includes and made some very minor, clearly NFC refactorings such as
in allocator.traits/allocator.traits.members/allocate.verify.cpp where
the old test basically made no sense the way it was written.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146236
There are a handful of standard library types that are intended
to support CTAD but don't need any explicit deduction guides to
do so.
This patch adds a dummy deduction guide to those types to suppress
-Wctad-maybe-unsupported (which gets emitted in user code).
This is a re-application of the original patch by Eric Fiselier in
fcd549a7d828 which had been reverted due to reasons lost at this point.
I also added the macro to a few more types. Reviving this patch was
prompted by the discussion on https://llvm.org/D133425.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133535
When we ship LLVM 16, <ranges> won't be considered experimental anymore.
We might as well do this sooner rather than later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132151
Evaluating `contiguous_iterator` on an iterator that satisfies all the
constraints except the `to_address` constraint and doesn't have
`operator->` defined results in a hard error. This is because
instantiating `to_address` ends up instantiating templates
dependent on the given type which might lead to a hard error even
in a SFINAE context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130835
This iterator is used to test code that only needs to satisfy the
output_iterator concept. Follow-up changes will use this iterator in
older language Standards.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, philnik, var-const
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122072
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
This follows the general direction of D118736 that
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES` does *not* guard anything outside
of the `std::ranges::` namespace itself. This means we must permit
`ranges::less` etc. in no-ranges mode; that seems fine to me.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120139
Fixup tests that believe them to be so. Most notably including some heavy refactoring in `std/iterators/iterator.primitives/iterator.traits/cxx20_iterator_traits.compile.pass.cpp`, which now detects pointers and validates that `iterator_concept` is present only for pointers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117368
The logic here is that we are disabling *only* things in `std::ranges::`.
Everything in `std::` is permitted, including `default_sentinel`, `contiguous_iterator`,
`common_iterator`, `projected`, `swappable`, and so on. Then, we include
anything from `std::ranges::` that is required in order to make those things
work: `ranges::swap`, `ranges::swap_ranges`, `input_range`, `ranges::begin`,
`ranges::iter_move`, and so on. But then that's all. Everything else (including
notably all of the "views" and the `std::views` namespace itself) is still
locked up behind `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118736
The renames the output_iterator to cpp17_output_iterator. These
iterators are still used in C++20 so it's not possible to change the
current type to the new C++20 requirements. This is done in a similar
fashion as the cpp17_input_iterator.
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117950
As discovered in D117817, `std::ranges::input_range<Holder<Incomplete>*[10]>`
hard-errored before this patch. That's because `input_range` requires
`iter_rvalue_reference_t`, which requires `iter_move`, which was
not ADL-proofed.
Add ADL-proofing tests to all the range refinements.
`output_range` and `common_range` shouldn't be affected,
and all the others subsume `input_range` anyway, but we might as
well be thorough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118213
Move `iter_swap.pass.cpp` into a new subdirectory: `iterator.cust.swap`
for symmetry with the neighboring subdirectory `iterator.cust.move`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116992
Some individual test files verify the CPO under test satisfies
`semiregular` concept. This is redundant since it is already part of the test
in verifying whether the entity is indeed a CPO in
`libcxx/test/std/library/description/conventions/customization.point.object/cpo.compile.pass.cpp`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116173
Before this patch, we had features named 'libc++', 'libstdc++' and
'msvc' to describe the three implementations that use our test suite.
This patch renames them to 'stdlib=libc++', 'stdlib=libstdc++', etc
to avoid confusion between MSVC's STL and the MSVC compiler (or Clang
in MSVC mode).
Furthermore, this prepares the terrain for adding support for additional
"implementations" to the test suite. Basically, I'd like to be able to
treat Apple's libc++ differently from LLVM's libc++ for the purpose of
testing, because those effectively behave in different ways in some aspects.
`contiguous_iterator` requires the iterator type passed is either a
pointer type or that the element type of the iterator is a complete
object type. These constraints are not part of the current wording in
defining the `contiguous_iterator` concept - adjust the concept to
reflect this.
Inspired from discussion at https://reviews.llvm.org/D108645.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108855
Since we officially don't support several older compilers now, we can
drop a lot of the markup in the test suite. This helps keep the test
suite simple and makes sure that UNSUPPORTED annotations don't rot.
This is the first patch of a series that will remove annotations for
compilers that are now unsupported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107787
Move the tests to libcxx so they no longer need `REQUIRES: libc++`.
Verify tests don't need `REQUIRES: libc++`.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106673
