17 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
James Y Knight
c7f3437507
NFC: Clean up of IntrusiveRefCntPtr construction from raw pointers. (#151545)
Handles clang::DiagnosticsEngine and clang::DiagnosticIDs.

For DiagnosticIDs, this mostly migrates from `new DiagnosticIDs` to
convenience method `DiagnosticIDs::create()`.

Part of cleanup https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/151026
2025-07-31 15:07:35 -04:00
Jan Svoboda
13e1a2cb22 Reapply "[clang] Remove intrusive reference count from DiagnosticOptions (#139584)"
This reverts commit e2a885537f11f8d9ced1c80c2c90069ab5adeb1d. Build failures were fixed right away and reverting the original commit without the fixes breaks the build again.
2025-05-22 12:52:03 -07:00
Kazu Hirata
e2a885537f Revert "[clang] Remove intrusive reference count from DiagnosticOptions (#139584)"
This reverts commit 9e306ad4600c4d3392c194a8be88919ee758425c.

Multiple builtbot failures have been reported:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139584
2025-05-22 12:44:20 -07:00
Jan Svoboda
9e306ad460
[clang] Remove intrusive reference count from DiagnosticOptions (#139584)
The `DiagnosticOptions` class is currently intrusively
reference-counted, which makes reasoning about its lifetime very
difficult in some cases. For example, `CompilerInvocation` owns the
`DiagnosticOptions` instance (wrapped in `llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr`) and
only exposes an accessor returning `DiagnosticOptions &`. One would
think this gives `CompilerInvocation` exclusive ownership of the object,
but that's not the case:

```c++
void shareOwnership(CompilerInvocation &CI) {
  llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<DiagnosticOptions> CoOwner = &CI.getDiagnosticOptions();
  // ...
}
```

This is a perfectly valid pattern that is being actually used in the
codebase.

I would like to ensure the ownership of `DiagnosticOptions` by
`CompilerInvocation` is guaranteed to be exclusive. This can be
leveraged for a copy-on-write optimization later on. This PR changes
usages of `DiagnosticOptions` across `clang`, `clang-tools-extra` and
`lldb` to not be intrusively reference-counted.
2025-05-22 12:33:52 -07:00
Jan Svoboda
27254ae511
[clang] NFCI: Use FileEntryRef for FileID creation (#67838)
This patch removes the `SourceManager` APIs that create `FileID` from a
`const FileEntry *` in favor of APIs that take `FileEntryRef`. This also
removes a misleading documentation that claims `nullptr` file entry
represents stdin. I don't think that's right, since we just try to
dereference that pointer anyways.
2023-10-03 13:07:46 -07:00
serge-sans-paille
d47ee525f9 [clang-tooling] Prevent llvm::fatal_error on invalid CLI option
Fail gracefully instead. Prevent further misuse by enforcing the factory builder
instead of the constructor.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94420
2021-01-29 10:15:06 +01:00
Michal Gorny
0820041e1d [clang-tools-extra] [cmake] Link against libclang-cpp whenever possible
Use clang_target_link_libraries() in order to support linking against
libclang-cpp instead of static libraries.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68448

llvm-svn: 373786
2019-10-04 20:30:02 +00:00
Harlan Haskins
a02f85768d [clang-tools-extra] Adopt FileManager's error-returning APIs
The FileManager has been updated to return llvm::ErrorOr from getFile
and getDirectory, this commit updates all the callers of those APIs from
clang.

llvm-svn: 367617
2019-08-01 21:32:01 +00:00
Nico Weber
9920b98c71 gn build: Add build files for some clang-tools-extra
Adds clang-change-namespace, clang-move, clang-query,
clang-reorder-fields.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59554

llvm-svn: 356567
2019-03-20 16:14:16 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
2946cd7010 Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636
2019-01-19 08:50:56 +00:00
Fangrui Song
41c249adc4 Add explicit dependency on clangSerialization after rC348911
llvm-svn: 348916
2018-12-12 08:25:16 +00:00
Shoaib Meenai
d806af3499 [CMake] Use PRIVATE in target_link_libraries for executables
We currently use target_link_libraries without an explicit scope
specifier (INTERFACE, PRIVATE or PUBLIC) when linking executables.
Dependencies added in this way apply to both the target and its
dependencies, i.e. they become part of the executable's link interface
and are transitive.

Transitive dependencies generally don't make sense for executables,
since you wouldn't normally be linking against an executable. This also
causes issues for generating install export files when using
LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS. For example, clang has a lot of LLVM
library dependencies, which are currently added as interface
dependencies. If clang is in the distribution components but the LLVM
libraries it depends on aren't (which is a perfectly legitimate use case
if the LLVM libraries are being built static and there are therefore no
run-time dependencies on them), CMake will complain about the LLVM
libraries not being in export set when attempting to generate the
install export file for clang. This is reasonable behavior on CMake's
part, and the right thing is for LLVM's build system to explicitly use
PRIVATE dependencies for executables.

Unfortunately, CMake doesn't allow you to mix and match the keyword and
non-keyword target_link_libraries signatures for a single target; i.e.,
if a single call to target_link_libraries for a particular target uses
one of the INTERFACE, PRIVATE, or PUBLIC keywords, all other calls must
also be updated to use those keywords. This means we must do this change
in a single shot. I also fully expect to have missed some instances; I
tested by enabling all the projects in the monorepo (except dragonegg),
and configuring both with and without shared libraries, on both Darwin
and Linux, but I'm planning to rely on the buildbots for other
configurations (since it should be pretty easy to fix those).

Even after this change, we still have a lot of target_link_libraries
calls that don't specify a scope keyword, mostly for shared libraries.
I'm thinking about addressing those in a follow-up, but that's a
separate change IMO.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40823

llvm-svn: 319840
2017-12-05 21:49:56 +00:00
Shoaib Meenai
c40419d94b [clang-reorder-fields] Switch to add_clang_tool
`add_clang_tool` invokes `add_clang_executable` internally, but it also
takes care of setting up the install rule. It also adds an `install-*`
build target, which is required for `LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39523

llvm-svn: 317149
2017-11-02 01:10:05 +00:00
Alexander Shaposhnikov
e4920c6fb9 [clang-rename] Fix handling of unchanged files
Fix the output of clang-rename for the files without modifications.
Update the code in clang-reorder-fields/tool/ClangReorderFields.cpp 
to avoid inconsistency.

Example:
a.h:
struct A {};
a.cpp:
#include "a.h"
int main() { return 0; }

Before the changes the output looks like this:
clang-rename -qualified-name=A -new-name=B a.cpp
<<<<<INVALID SOURCE LOCATION>>>>>

Test plan: make -j8 check-clang-tools

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24634

llvm-svn: 281826
2016-09-17 17:08:47 +00:00
Alexander Shaposhnikov
bf3c84cff7 Add clang-reorder-fields to clang-tools-extra
This diff adds v0 of clang-reorder-fields tool to clang/tools/extra.
The main idea behind this tool is to simplify and make less error-prone refactoring of large codebases when
someone needs to change the order fields of a struct/class (for example to remove excessive padding).

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23279

llvm-svn: 280456
2016-09-02 02:56:07 +00:00
Alexander Shaposhnikov
3efddd22b9 Revert https://reviews.llvm.org/D23279 because the tests have failed on several platforms
llvm-svn: 280438
2016-09-02 00:24:06 +00:00
Alexander Shaposhnikov
ae4ff453a4 Add clang-reorder-fields to clang-tools-extra
This diff adds v0 of clang-reorder-fields tool to clang/tools/extra.
The main idea behind this tool is to simplify and make less error-prone refactoring of large codebases when
someone needs to change the order fields of a struct/class (for example to remove excess padding).

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23279

llvm-svn: 280431
2016-09-01 23:49:48 +00:00