This is a follow-up from the conversation starting at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93809#issuecomment-2173729801
The root problem that motivated the change are external AST sources that
compute `ASTRecordLayout`s themselves instead of letting Clang compute
them from the AST. One such example is LLDB using DWARF to get the
definitive offsets and sizes of C++ structures. Such layouts should be
considered correct (modulo buggy DWARF), but various assertions and
lowering logic around the `CGRecordLayoutBuilder` relies on the AST
having `[[no_unique_address]]` attached to them. This is a
layout-altering attribute which is not encoded in DWARF. This causes us
LLDB to trip over the various LLVM<->Clang layout consistency checks.
There has been precedent for avoiding such layout-altering attributes
from affecting lowering with externally-provided layouts (e.g., packed
structs).
This patch proposes to replace the `isZeroSize` checks in
`CGRecordLayoutBuilder` (which roughly means "empty field with
[[no_unique_address]]") with checks for
`CodeGen::isEmptyField`/`CodeGen::isEmptyRecord`.
**Details**
The main strategy here was to change the `isZeroSize` check in
`CGRecordLowering::accumulateFields` and
`CGRecordLowering::accumulateBases` to use the `isEmptyXXX` APIs
instead, preventing empty fields from being added to the `Members` and
`Bases` structures. The rest of the changes fall out from here, to
prevent lookups into these structures (for field numbers or base
indices) from failing.
Added `isEmptyRecordForLayout` and `isEmptyFieldForLayout` (open to
better naming suggestions). The main difference to the existing
`isEmptyRecord`/`isEmptyField` APIs, is that the `isEmptyXXXForLayout`
counterparts don't have special treatment for `unnamed bitfields`/arrays
and also treat fields of empty types as if they had
`[[no_unique_address]]` (i.e., just like the `AsIfNoUniqueAddr` in
`isEmptyField` does).
As reported in <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/58929>,
Clang's handling of empty structs in the case of small structs that may
be eligible to be passed using the hard FP calling convention doesn't
match g++. In general, C++ record fields are never empty unless
[[no_unique_address]] is used, but the RISC-V FP ABI overrides this.
After this patch, fields of structs that contain empty records will be
ignored, even in C++, when considering eligibility for the FP calling
convention ('flattening'). It isn't explicitly noted in the RISC-V
psABI, but arrays of empty records will disqualify a struct for
consideration of using the FP calling convention in g++. This patch
matches that behaviour. The psABI issue
<https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/issues/358> seeks
to clarify this.
This patch was previously committed but reverted after a bug was found.
This recommit adds additional logic to prevent that bug (adding an extra
check for when a candidate from detectFPCCEligibleStructHelper may not
be valid).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142327
This reverts commit 17a58b3ca7ec18585e9ea8ed8b39d72fe36fb6cb and the
minor documentation fix 569e99a471f618b7fdf045d5e96f21d3e3a7f898.
An issue was reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/D142327#inline-1510301
so reverting until it can be investigated and fixed.
This commit breaks up CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp into a set of *.cpp files,
one file per target. There are no functional changes, mostly just code moving.
Non-code-moving changes are:
* A virtual destructor has been added to DefaultABIInfo to pin the vtable to a cpp file.
* A few methods of ABIInfo and DefaultABIInfo were split into declaration + definition
in order to reduce the number of transitive includes.
* Several functions that used to be static have been placed in clang::CodeGen
namespace so that they can be accessed from other cpp files.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-splitting-clangs-targetinfo-cpp/69883
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148094
