A large majority of the LIT tests of the clang static analyzer use RUN
lines with the placeholder `%clang_analyze_cc1` which expands to
`%clang_cc1 -analyze -setup-static-analyzer` where the only effect of
`-setup-static-analyzer` is that it ensures that the macro
`__clang_analyzer__` is defined. However, there were some tests that
used `%clang_cc1 -analyze` directly; this commit changes those to using
`%clang_analyze_cc1` for the sake of consistency.
Previously `%clang_analyze_cc1` did not work within the directory
`exploded-graph-rewriter` (because that directory has its own custom
`lit.local.cfg`) but this problem was eliminated by the recent commit
40cc4379cda6e0d6efe72c55d1968f9cf427a16a, so it was possible to resolve
and delete the FIXME comments asking for this change.
There are a few tests that use `%clang --analyze` or other command-line
flags (e.g. help flags), those are not affected by this change.
This cleanup was discussed in the discourse thread
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/taking-ownership-of-clang-test-analysis/84689/11
We have a new policy in place making links to private resources
something we try to avoid in source and test files. Normally, we'd
organically switch to the new policy rather than make a sweeping change
across a project. However, Clang is in a somewhat special circumstance
currently: recently, I've had several new contributors run into rdar
links around test code which their patch was changing the behavior of.
This turns out to be a surprisingly bad experience, especially for
newer folks, for a handful of reasons: not understanding what the link
is and feeling intimidated by it, wondering whether their changes are
actually breaking something important to a downstream in some way,
having to hunt down strangers not involved with the patch to impose on
them for help, accidental pressure from asking for potentially private
IP to be made public, etc. Because folks run into these links entirely
by chance (through fixing bugs or working on new features), there's not
really a set of problematic links to focus on -- all of the links have
basically the same potential for causing these problems. As a result,
this is an omnibus patch to remove all such links.
This was not a mechanical change; it was done by manually searching for
rdar, radar, radr, and other variants to find all the various
problematic links. From there, I tried to retain or reword the
surrounding comments so that we would lose as little context as
possible. However, because most links were just a plain link with no
supporting context, the majority of the changes are simple removals.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158071
In some cases the analyzer didn't expect an array-type variable to be
initialized with anything other than a string literal. The patch essentially
removes the assertion, and ensures relatively sane behavior.
There is a bigger problem with these initializers. Currently our memory model
(RegionStore) is being ordered to initialize the array with a region that
is assumed to be storing the initializer rvalue, and it guesses to copy
the contents of that region to the array variable. However, it would make
more sense for RegionStore to receive the correct initializer in the first
place. This problem isn't addressed with this patch.
rdar://problem/27248428
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23963
llvm-svn: 315750
