This has been explicitly forbidden since C++11, but somehow the edge
case of converting a function pointer to void* using a cast like
`(void*)f` wasn't handled.
Fixes#150340 .
Per [decl.ref],
> Because a null pointer value or a pointer past the end of an object
does not point to an object, a reference in a well-defined program
cannot refer to such things.
Note this does not fixes the new bytecode interpreter.
Fixes#48665
The old codepath in GetFullTypeForDeclarator was under "if (not a class type)"
so that it failed to warn for class types. Move the diagnostic outside
of the "if" so that it warns in the proper situations.
Fixes#133380
Co-authored-by: cor3ntin <corentinjabot@gmail.com>
Instead of manually adding a note pointing to the relevant template
parameter to every relevant error, which is very easy to miss, this
patch adds a new instantiation context note, so that this can work using
RAII magic.
This fixes a bunch of places where these notes were missing, and is more
future-proof.
Some diagnostics are reworked to make better use of this note:
- Errors about missing template arguments now refer to the parameter
which is missing an argument.
- Template Template parameter mismatches now refer to template
parameters as parameters instead of arguments.
It's likely this will add the note to some diagnostics where the
parameter is not super relevant, but this can be reworked with time and
the decrease in maintenance burden makes up for it.
This bypasses the templight dumper for the new context entry, as the
tests are very hard to update.
This depends on #125453, which is needed to avoid losing the context
note for errors occuring during template argument deduction.
This fixes the core issue described in P3579, following the design
intent of P0522 to not introduce any new cases where a template template
parameter match is allowed for a template which is not valid for all
possible uses.
With this patch, narrowing conversions are disallowed for TTP matching.
This reuses the existing machinery for diagnosing narrowing in a
converted constant expression.
Since P0522 is a DR and we apply it all the way back to C++98, this
brings that machinery to use in older standards, in this very narrow
scope of TTP matching.
This still doesn't solve the ambiguity when partial ordering NTTPs of
different integral types, this is blocked by a different bug which will
be fixed in a subsequent patch (but the test cases are added).
... between unrelated declarations or literals.
Leaving this small (I haven't run the whole test suite locally) to get
some feedback on the wording and implementation first.
The output of the sample in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/117409 is now:
```console
./array.cpp:57:6: warning: expression result unused [-Wunused-value]
57 | am - aj.af();
| ~~ ^ ~~~~~~~
./array.cpp:70:8: error: call to consteval function 'L::L<bx>' is not a constant expression
70 | q(0, [] {
| ^
./array.cpp:57:6: note: arithmetic on addresses of literals has unspecified value
57 | am - aj.af();
| ^
./array.cpp:62:5: note: in call to 'al(&""[0], {&""[0]})'
62 | al(bp.af(), k);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./array.cpp:70:8: note: in call to 'L<bx>({})'
70 | q(0, [] {
| ^~~~
71 | struct bx {
| ~~~~~~~~~~~
72 | constexpr operator ab<g<l<decltype(""[0])>::e>::e>() { return t(""); }
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
73 | };
| ~~
74 | return bx();
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~
75 | }());
| ~~~
```
The output for
```c++
int a, b;
constexpr int n = &b - &a
```
is now:
```console
./array.cpp:80:15: error: constexpr variable 'n' must be initialized by a constant expression
80 | constexpr int n = &b - &a;
| ^ ~~~~~~~
./array.cpp:80:22: note: arithmetic involving '&b' and '&a' has unspecified value
80 | constexpr int n = &b - &a;
| ^
1 error generated.
```
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2749.html
This DR's effects are backported to C++98.
Does not affect C where integral constant expressions cannot involve
pointers.
---------
Co-authored-by: Vlad Serebrennikov <serebrennikov.vladislav@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: cor3ntin <corentinjabot@gmail.com>
[[expr.const]/5.14](https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.const#5.14) says that
constexpr cast from <code>*cv* void\*</code> to `T*` is OK if the
pointee type is similar to `T`, but Clang currently only permits the
conversion if the types are the same except top-level cv-qualifiers.
This patch also allows casting `(void*)nullptr`, implementing the
resolution of [CWG2819](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2819).
---------
Co-authored-by: Vlad Serebrennikov <serebrennikov.vladislav@gmail.com>
Revert "[Clang][C++23] Implement P2448R2: Relaxing some constexpr
restrictions (#77753)"
This reverts commit 99500e8c08a4d941acb8a7eb00523296fb2acf7a because it
causes a behavior change for std=c++20. See
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77753.
Per
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2448r2.html
function/constructor/destructor can be marked `constexpr` even though it
never produces a constant expression.
Non-literal types as return types and parameter types of functions
marked `constexpr` are also allowed.
Since this is not a DR, the diagnostic messages are still preserved for
C++ standards older than C++23.
This reverts commit 491b2810fb7fe5f080fa9c4f5945ed0a6909dc92.
This change broke valid code and generated incorrect diagnostics, see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155064
This patch makes clang diagnose extensive cases of consteval if and is_constant_evaluated usage that are tautologically true or false.
This introduces a new IsRuntimeEvaluated boolean flag to Sema::ExpressionEvaluationContextRecord that means the immediate appearance of if consteval or is_constant_evaluated are tautologically false(e.g. inside if !consteval {} block or non-constexpr-qualified function definition body)
This patch also pushes new expression evaluation context when parsing the condition of if constexpr and initializer of constexpr variables so that Sema can be aware that the use of consteval if and is_consteval are tautologically true in if constexpr condition and constexpr variable initializers.
BEFORE this patch, the warning for is_constant_evaluated was emitted from constant evaluator. This patch moves the warning logic to Sema in order to diagnose tautological use of is_constant_evaluated in the same way as consteval if.
This patch separates initializer evaluation context from InitializerScopeRAII.
This fixes a bug that was happening when user takes address of function address in initializers of non-local variables.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/43760
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51567
Reviewed By: cor3ntin, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155064
We have a new policy in place making links to private resources
something we try to avoid in source and test files. Normally, we'd
organically switch to the new policy rather than make a sweeping change
across a project. However, Clang is in a somewhat special circumstance
currently: recently, I've had several new contributors run into rdar
links around test code which their patch was changing the behavior of.
This turns out to be a surprisingly bad experience, especially for
newer folks, for a handful of reasons: not understanding what the link
is and feeling intimidated by it, wondering whether their changes are
actually breaking something important to a downstream in some way,
having to hunt down strangers not involved with the patch to impose on
them for help, accidental pressure from asking for potentially private
IP to be made public, etc. Because folks run into these links entirely
by chance (through fixing bugs or working on new features), there's not
really a set of problematic links to focus on -- all of the links have
basically the same potential for causing these problems. As a result,
this is an omnibus patch to remove all such links.
This was not a mechanical change; it was done by manually searching for
rdar, radar, radr, and other variants to find all the various
problematic links. From there, I tried to retain or reword the
surrounding comments so that we would lose as little context as
possible. However, because most links were just a plain link with no
supporting context, the majority of the changes are simple removals.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158071
This results in expressions that appear in default function argument not
being checked for being actual constant expressions.
This aligns clang's behavior with the standard and fixes one of the
examples from https://wg21.link/P1073R3.
Reviewed By: shafik, cor3ntin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145251
https://wg21.link/p1937 proposes that in unevaluated contexts, consteval
functions should not be immediately evaluated.
Clang implemented p1937 a while ago, its behavior is correct and the
test needs an update.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145362
During Clang 15, 3d2629dd3aab17098813c68b5b76bb864bc5e285 claimed we
achieved full support for consteval in C++20. However, further testing
shows that Clang doesn't correctly handle all of the examples from
https://wg21.link/P1073R3 and has several other known issues that are
preventing us from defining the `__cpp_consteval` macro.
I think we should only claim Partial support for the moment. Once we
correct the major outstanding issues, then I think we should change the
status back to full support and define __cpp_consteval at the same time
(even if it's only to the 201811L value instead of the latest value
from C++2b). This helps users understand the support situation more
clearly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144572
Currently we don't diagnose overflow in a constant expression for the case of
compound assignment with remainder as a operand.
In handleIntIntBinOp the arguments LHS and Result can be the same source but in
the check for remainder in this function we assigned to Result before checking
for overflow. In all the other operations the check is done before Result is
assigned to.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140455
to member naming a weak member to nullptr.
This fixes a miscompile where constant evaluation would incorrectly
determine that a weak member function pointer is never null.
In passing, also improve the diagnostics for constant evaluation of some
nearby cases.
This makes use of the changes introduced in D134604, in order to
instantiate non-type template parameters and default template arguments
with a final sugared substitution.
This comes at no additional relevant cost.
Since we don't track / unique them in specializations, we wouldn't be
able to resugar them later anyway.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136564
This patch reverts
- commit d4b1964f0554046b1e64908e5c1cd701b25f4c9e
- commit 59f0827e2cf3755834620e7e0b6d946832440f80([clang] Instantiate alias templates with sugar)
As it makes clang fail to pass some code it used to compile.
See comments: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136564#3891065
This makes use of the changes introduced in D134604, in order to
instantiate non-type template parameters and default template arguments
with a final sugared substitution.
This comes at no additional relevant cost.
Since we don't track / unique them in specializations, we wouldn't be
able to resugar them later anyway.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136564
This makes use of the changes introduced in D134604, in order to
instantiate non-type template parameters and default template arguments
with a final sugared substitution.
This comes at no additional relevant cost.
Since we don't track / unique them in specializations, we wouldn't be
able to resugar them later anyway.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136564
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.
The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.
An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.
---
Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:
1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
print types as written. There are customization options there, but
not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
the so called canonical types.
Example:
```
namespace foo {
struct A {};
A a;
};
```
If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
will make it print it accurately even when written without
qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.
2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
the name of the canonical type is the better choice.
3) This patch could expose a bug in how you get the source range of some
TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
dealing with will always include some source location.
4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
`dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.
5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.
Let me know if you need any help!
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
This reverts commit 7c51f02effdbd0d5e12bfd26f9c3b2ab5687c93f because it
stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was re-landed without addressing the
issue or even agreement on how to address the issue. More details and
discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374.
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.
The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.
An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.
---
Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:
1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
print types as written. There are customization options there, but
not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
the so called canonical types.
Example:
```
namespace foo {
struct A {};
A a;
};
```
If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
will make it print it accurately even when written without
qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.
2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
the name of the canonical type is the better choice.
3) This patch could exposed a bug in how you get the source range of some
TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
dealing with will always include some source location.
4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
`dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.
5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.
Let me know if you need any help!
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
This reverts commit bdc6974f92304f4ed542241b9b89ba58ba6b20aa because it
breaks all the LLDB tests that import the std module.
import-std-module/array.TestArrayFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/deque-basic.TestDequeFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/deque-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentDequeFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/forward_list.TestForwardListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/forward_list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentForwardListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/list.TestListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/queue.TestQueueFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/stack.TestStackFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector.TestVectorFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector-bool.TestVectorBoolFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentVectorFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector-of-vectors.TestVectorOfVectorsFromStdModule.py
https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/45301/
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.
The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.
An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
Word on the grapevine was that the committee had some discussion that
ended with unanimous agreement on eliminating relational function pointer comparisons.
We wanted to be bold and just ban all of them cold turkey.
But then we chickened out at the last second and are going for
eliminating just the spaceship overload candidate instead, for now.
See D104680 for reference.
This should be fine and "safe", because the only possible semantic change this
would cause is that overload resolution could possibly be ambiguous if
there was another viable candidate equally as good.
But to save face a little we are going to:
* Issue an "error" for three-way comparisons on function pointers.
But all this is doing really is changing one vague error message,
from an "invalid operands to binary expression" into an
"ordered comparison of function pointers", which sounds more like we mean business.
* Otherwise "warn" that comparing function pointers like that is totally
not cool (unless we are told to keep quiet about this).
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104892
callee in constant evaluation.
We previously made a deep copy of function parameters of class type when
passing them, resulting in the destructor for the parameter applying to
the original argument value, ignoring any modifications made in the
function body. This also meant that the 'this' pointer of the function
parameter could be observed changing between the caller and the callee.
This change completely reimplements how we model function parameters
during constant evaluation. We now model them roughly as if they were
variables living in the caller, albeit with an artificially reduced
scope that covers only the duration of the function call, instead of
modeling them as temporaries in the caller that we partially "reparent"
into the callee at the point of the call. This brings some minor
diagnostic improvements, as well as significantly reduced stack usage
during constant evaluation.
callee in constant evaluation.
We previously made a deep copy of function parameters of class type when
passing them, resulting in the destructor for the parameter applying to
the original argument value, ignoring any modifications made in the
function body. This also meant that the 'this' pointer of the function
parameter could be observed changing between the caller and the callee.
This change completely reimplements how we model function parameters
during constant evaluation. We now model them roughly as if they were
variables living in the caller, albeit with an artificially reduced
scope that covers only the duration of the function call, instead of
modeling them as temporaries in the caller that we partially "reparent"
into the callee at the point of the call. This brings some minor
diagnostic improvements, as well as significantly reduced stack usage
during constant evaluation.
callee in constant evaluation.
We previously made a deep copy of function parameters of class type when
passing them, resulting in the destructor for the parameter applying to
the original argument value, ignoring any modifications made in the
function body. This also meant that the 'this' pointer of the function
parameter could be observed changing between the caller and the callee.
This change completely reimplements how we model function parameters
during constant evaluation. We now model them roughly as if they were
variables living in the caller, albeit with an artificially reduced
scope that covers only the duration of the function call, instead of
modeling them as temporaries in the caller that we partially "reparent"
into the callee at the point of the call. This brings some minor
diagnostic improvements, as well as significantly reduced stack usage
during constant evaluation.
variable's initializer is not known.
The hope is that a better diagnostic for this case will reduce the rate
at which duplicates of non-bug PR41093 are reported.
The C++ rules briefly allowed this, but the rule changed nearly 10 years
ago and we never updated our implementation to match. However, we've
warned on this by default for a long time, and no other compiler accepts
(even as an extension).
