7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sirraide
12f78e740c
[Clang] [NFC] Fix unintended -Wreturn-type warnings everywhere in the test suite (#123464)
In preparation of making `-Wreturn-type` default to an error (as there
is virtually no situation where you’d *want* to fall off the end of a
function that is supposed to return a value), this patch fixes tests
that have relied on this being only a warning, of which there seem 
to be 3 kinds:

1. Tests which for no apparent reason have a function that triggers the
warning.

I suspect that a lot of these were on accident (or from before the
warning was introduced), since a lot of people will open issues w/ their
problematic code in the `main` function (which is the one case where you
don’t need to return from a non-void function, after all...), which
someone will then copy, possibly into a namespace, possibly renaming it,
the end result of that being that you end up w/ something that
definitely is not `main` anymore, but which still is declared as
returning `int`, and which still has no return statement (another reason
why I think this might apply to a lot of these is because usually the
actual return type of such problematic functions is quite literally
`int`).
  
A lot of these are really old tests that don’t use `-verify`, which is
why no-one noticed or had to care about the extra warning that was
already being emitted by them until now.

2. Tests which test either `-Wreturn-type`, `[[noreturn]]`, or what
codegen and sanitisers do whenever you do fall off the end of a
function.

3. Tests where I struggle to figure out what is even being tested
(usually because they’re Objective-C tests, and I don’t know
Objective-C), whether falling off the end of a function matters in the
first place, and tests where actually spelling out an expression to
return would be rather cumbersome (e.g. matrix types currently don’t
support list initialisation, so I can’t write e.g. `return {}`).

For tests that fall into categories 2 and 3, I just added
`-Wno-error=return-type` to the `RUN` lines and called it a day. This
was especially necessary for the former since `-Wreturn-type` is an
analysis-based warning, meaning that it is currently impossible to test
for more than one occurrence of it in the same compilation if it
defaults to an error since the analysis pass is skipped for subsequent
functions as soon as an error is emitted.

I’ve also added `-Werror=return-type` to a few tests that I had already
updated as this patch was previously already making the warning an error
by default, but we’ve decided to split that into two patches instead.
2025-01-18 19:16:33 +01:00
Fangrui Song
74742147ee [test] Change cc1 -fvisibility to -fvisibility= 2022-09-02 12:36:44 -07:00
Vlad Tsyrklevich
3f3aad235d Reland "CFI: blacklist STL allocate() from unrelated-casts"
Reland r310097 with a fix for a debug assertion in NamedDecl.getName()

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36294

llvm-svn: 310132
2017-08-04 21:21:00 +00:00
Vlad Tsyrklevich
bbe96e50f3 Revert "Reland "CFI: blacklist STL allocate() from unrelated-casts""
This reverts commit r310105.

llvm-svn: 310121
2017-08-04 20:37:49 +00:00
Vlad Tsyrklevich
bf736037be Reland "CFI: blacklist STL allocate() from unrelated-casts"
Reland r310097 with a unit test fix for MS ABI build bots.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36294

llvm-svn: 310105
2017-08-04 19:50:39 +00:00
Vlad Tsyrklevich
3fed079f8c Revert "CFI: blacklist STL allocate() from unrelated-casts"
This reverts commit r310097.

llvm-svn: 310099
2017-08-04 19:17:16 +00:00
Vlad Tsyrklevich
44200125e9 CFI: blacklist STL allocate() from unrelated-casts
Summary:
Previously, STL allocators were blacklisted in compiler_rt's
cfi_blacklist.txt because they mandated a cast from void* to T* before
object initialization completed. This change moves that logic into the
front end because C++ name mangling supports a substitution compression
mechanism for symbols that makes it difficult to blacklist the mangled
symbol for allocate() using a regular expression.

Motivated by crbug.com/751385.

Reviewers: pcc, kcc

Reviewed By: pcc

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36294

llvm-svn: 310097
2017-08-04 19:10:11 +00:00