This patch improves the preservation of qualifiers and loss of type
sugar in TemplateNames.
This problem is analogous to https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374 and this
patch takes a very similar approach to that patch, except the impact
here is much lesser.
When a TemplateName was written bare, without qualifications, we
wouldn't produce a QualifiedTemplate which could be used to disambiguate
it from a Canonical TemplateName. This had effects in the TemplateName
printer, which had workarounds to deal with this, and wouldn't print the
TemplateName as-written in most situations.
There are also some related fixes to help preserve this type sugar along
the way into diagnostics, so that this patch can be properly tested.
- Fix dropping the template keyword.
- Fix type deduction to preserve sugar in TST TemplateNames.
The default version of OpenMP is updated from 5.0 to 5.1 which means if -fopenmp is specified but -fopenmp-version is not specified with clang, the default version of OpenMP is taken to be 5.1. After modifying the Frontend for that, various LIT tests were updated. This patch contains all such changes. At a high level, these are the patterns of changes observed in LIT tests -
# RUN lines which mentioned `-fopenmp-version=50` need to kept only if the IR for version 5.0 and 5.1 are different. Otherwise only one RUN line with no version info(i.e. default version) needs to be there.
# Test cases of this sort already had the RUN lines with respect to the older default version 5.0 and the version 5.1. Only swapping the version specification flag `-fopenmp-version` from newer version RUN line to older version RUN line is required.
# Diagnostics: Remove the 5.0 version specific RUN lines if there was no difference in the Diagnostics messages with respect to the default 5.1.
# Diagnostics: In case there was any difference in diagnostics messages between 5.0 and 5.1, mention version specific messages in tests.
# If the test contained version specific ifdef's e.g. "#ifdef OMP5" but there were no RUN lines for any other version than 5.X, then bring the code guarded by ifdef's outside and remove the ifdef's.
# Some tests had RUN lines for both 5.0 and 5.1 versions, but it is found that the IR for 5.0 is not different from the 5.1, therefore such RUN lines are redundant. So, such duplicated lines are removed.
# To generate CHECK lines automatically, use the script llvm/utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
Reviewed By: saiislam, ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129635
(cherry picked from commit 9dd2999907dc791136a75238a6000f69bf67cf4e)
Summary:
Introduced OMPChildren class to handle all associated clauses, statement
and child expressions/statements. It allows to represent some directives
more correctly (like flush, depobj etc. with pseudo clauses, ordered
depend directives, which are standalone, and target data directives).
Also, it will make easier to avoid using of CapturedStmt in directives,
if required (atomic, tile etc. directives).
Also, it simplifies serialization/deserialization of the
executable/declarative directives.
Reduces number of allocation operations for mapper declarations.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: yaxunl, guansong, jfb, cfe-commits, sstefan1, aaron.ballman, caomhin
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83261
If standalone OpenMP declaration pragma, like declare mapper or declare
reduction, is declared in the class context, it may reference a member
(data or function) in its internal expressions/statements. So, the
parsing of such pragmas must be dalayed just like the parsing of the
member initializers/definitions before the completion of the class
declaration.
This patches fixes the case when a user-defined mapper is attached to
the elements of an array, and to report error when a mapper is used for
types other than struct, class, and union.
Patch by Lingda Li <lildmh@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67978
llvm-svn: 373023
This patch implements the parsing and sema support for the OpenMP
'from'-clause with potential user-defined mappers attached.
User-defined mappers are a new feature in OpenMP 5.0. A 'from'-clause
can have an explicit or implicit associated mapper, which instructs the
compiler to generate and use customized mapping functions. An example is
shown below:
struct S { int len; int *d; };
#pragma omp declare mapper(id: struct S s) map(s, s.d[0:s.len])
struct S ss;
#pragma omp target update from(mapper(id): ss) // use the mapper with name 'id' to map ss from device
Contributed-by: Lingda Li <lildmh@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58638
llvm-svn: 354817
This patch implements the parsing and sema support for OpenMP to clause
with potential user-defined mappers attached. User defined mapper is a
new feature in OpenMP 5.0. A to/from clause can have an explicit or
implicit associated mapper, which instructs the compiler to generate and
use customized mapping functions. An example is shown below:
struct S { int len; int *d; };
#pragma omp declare mapper(id: struct S s) map(s, s.d[0:s.len])
struct S ss;
#pragma omp target update to(mapper(id): ss) // use the mapper with name 'id' to map ss to device
Contributed-by: <lildmh@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58523
llvm-svn: 354698
This patch implements the parsing and sema support for OpenMP map
clauses with potential user-defined mapper attached. User defined mapper
is a new feature in OpenMP 5.0. A map clause can have an explicit or
implicit associated mapper, which instructs the compiler to generate
extra data mapping. An example is shown below:
struct S { int len; int *d; };
#pragma omp declare mapper(id: struct S s) map(s, s.d[0:s.len])
struct S ss;
#pragma omp target map(mapper(id) tofrom: ss) // use the mapper with name 'id' to map ss
Contributed-by: Lingda Li <lildmh@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58074
llvm-svn: 354347
This patch implements parsing and sema for "omp declare mapper"
directive. User defined mapper, i.e., declare mapper directive, is a new
feature in OpenMP 5.0. It is introduced to extend existing map clauses
for the purpose of simplifying the copy of complex data structures
between host and device (i.e., deep copy). An example is shown below:
struct S { int len; int *d; };
#pragma omp declare mapper(struct S s) map(s, s.d[0:s.len]) // Memory region that d points to is also mapped using this mapper.
Contributed-by: Lingda Li <lildmh@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56326
llvm-svn: 352906
