We allowed implicit this access when checking associated constraints
after CWG2369. As a result, some of the invalid function call
expressions were not properly SFINAE'ed out and ended up as hard errors
at evaluation time.
We tried fixing that by mucking around the CurContext, but that spawned
additional breakages and I think it's probably safe to revert to the
previous behavior to avoid churns.
Though there is CWG2589, which justifies the previous change, it's not
what we're pursuing now.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/151271
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/145505
CWG2369 revealed another case where we were SFINAE'ing out the invalid
result of substitution, but the expression now makes the way into evaluation.
We switch to the concept specialization's context before we check it.
This ensures that we're able to realize the invalid expression earlier,
so we can avoid evaluating invalid expression, which is a hard error.
This also fixes#115838
The previous approach broke code generation for the MS ABI due to an
unintended code path during constraint substitution. This time we
address the issue by inspecting the evaluation contexts and thereby
avoiding that code path.
This reapplies 96eced624 (#102857).
After 0dedd6fe1 and 03229e7c0, invalid concept declarations might lack
expressions for evaluation and normalization. This could make it crash
in certain scenarios, apart from the one of evaluation concepts showed
in 03229e7c0, there's also an issue when checking specializations where
the normalization also relies on a non-null expression.
This patch prevents that by avoiding building up a type constraint in
such situations, thereafter the template parameter wouldn't have a
concept specialization of a null expression.
With this patch, the assumption in ASTWriterDecl is no longer valid.
Namely, HasConstraint and TypeConstraintInitialized must now represent
different meanings for both source fidelity and semantic requirements.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/115004
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/121980
Since #103867, the nullness of the concept declaration has been turned
to represent a state in which the concept definition is being parsed and
used for self-reference checking.
However, PR missed a case where such a definition could be invalid, and
we shall inhibit making it into evaluation.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/109780
I found this issue (a separate one) during the investigation of #86757,
the crash is similar in substituteParameterMappings, but at different
inner places.
This was an out-of-bound issue where we access front element in an empty
written template argument list to get the instantiation source range.
This patch fixes it by adding a proper guard.
This fixes the case shown by
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/64808#issuecomment-1929131611.
Similar to
f9caa12328,
we have some calls to constraint checking for a lambda's conversion
function while determining the conversion sequence.
This patch addresses the problem where the requires-expression within
such a lambda references to a Decl outside of the lambda by adding these
Decls to the current instantiation scope.
I'm abusing the flag `ForOverloadResolution` of
CheckFunctionConstraints, which is actually meant to consider the Decls
from parent DeclContexts.
---------
Co-authored-by: cor3ntin <corentinjabot@gmail.com>
We build up a `CXXFoldExpr` for immediately declared constraints as per
C++20 [temp.param]/4. This is done by
`formImmediatelyDeclaredConstraint` where an `EllipsisLoc` is essential
to determine whether this is a pack.
On the other hand, when attempting to instantiate a class template,
member templates might not be instantiated immediately, so we leave them
intact. For function templates with NTTPs, we reattach constraints if
possible so that they can be evaluated later. To properly form that, we
attempted to extract an ellipsis location if the param per se was a
parameter pack. Unfortunately, for the following NTTP case, we seemingly
failed to handle:
```cpp
template <Constraint auto... Pack>
void member();
```
The NTTPD Pack is neither an `ExpandedParameterPack` nor a
`PackExpansion` (its type does not expand anything). As a result, we end
up losing track of the constraints on packs, although we have them
inside the associated `CXXFoldExpr`.
This patch fixes that by extracting the ellipsis location out of the
previous constraint expression. Closes
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63837.
This reverts commit 491b2810fb7fe5f080fa9c4f5945ed0a6909dc92.
This change broke valid code and generated incorrect diagnostics, see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155064
This patch makes clang diagnose extensive cases of consteval if and is_constant_evaluated usage that are tautologically true or false.
This introduces a new IsRuntimeEvaluated boolean flag to Sema::ExpressionEvaluationContextRecord that means the immediate appearance of if consteval or is_constant_evaluated are tautologically false(e.g. inside if !consteval {} block or non-constexpr-qualified function definition body)
This patch also pushes new expression evaluation context when parsing the condition of if constexpr and initializer of constexpr variables so that Sema can be aware that the use of consteval if and is_consteval are tautologically true in if constexpr condition and constexpr variable initializers.
BEFORE this patch, the warning for is_constant_evaluated was emitted from constant evaluator. This patch moves the warning logic to Sema in order to diagnose tautological use of is_constant_evaluated in the same way as consteval if.
This patch separates initializer evaluation context from InitializerScopeRAII.
This fixes a bug that was happening when user takes address of function address in initializers of non-local variables.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/43760
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51567
Reviewed By: cor3ntin, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155064
As reported in #66612, we aren't correctly treating the placeholder
expression type correctly, so we ended up trying to get a reference
version of it, and this resulted in an assertion, since the placeholder
type cannot have a reference added.
Fixes: #66612
BEFORE this patch, when clang handles constraints like C1 || C2 where C1 evaluates to false and C2 evaluates to true, it emitted irrelevant diagnostics about the falsity of C1.
This patch removes the irrelevant diagnostic information generated during the evaluation of C1 if C2 evaluates to true.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54678
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157526
A lambda call operator can be a templated entity -
and therefore have constraints while not being a function template
template<class T> void f() {
[]() requires false { }();
}
In that case, we would check the constraints of the call operator
which is non-viable. However, we would find a viable candidate:
the conversion operator to function pointer, and use it to
perform a surrogate call.
These constraints were not checked because:
* We never check the constraints of surrogate functions
* The lambda conversion operator has non constraints.
From the wording, it is not clear what the intent is but
it seems reasonable to expect the constraints of the lambda conversion
operator to be checked and it is consistent with GCC and MSVC.
This patch also improve the diagnostics for constraint failure
on surrogate calls.
Fixes#63181
Reviewed By: #clang-language-wg, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154368
This diff switches the approach to comparison of constraint expressions
to the new one based on template args substitution.
It continues the effort to fix our handling of out-of-line definitions
of constrained templates.
This is a recommit of 3a54022934.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146178
This commit implements [temp.deduct]p9.
Test updates include:
- New notes in `cxx1y-init-captures.cpp`, `lambda-expressions.cpp`
and 'warn-unused-lambda-capture.cpp'.
This seems to be caused by diagnosing errors earlier (during
deduction) that were previously surfaced later (during
instantiation).
- New error `lambda-unevaluated.cpp` is in line with [temp.deduct]p9.
Reviewed By: erichkeane, #clang-language-wg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148802
This diff switches the approach to comparison of constraint expressions
to the new one based on template args substitution.
It continues the effort to fix our handling of out-of-line definitions
of constrained templates.
This is a recommit of e3b1083e00.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146178
This reverts commit e3b1083e00e62f5d157d15cb8c63a1c3dfdf12e2.
This was reverted because it breaks a number of libstdc++ examples, AND
required a workaround that causes hiding of legitimate bugs.
This diff switches the approach to comparison of constraint expressions
to the new one based on template args substitution.
It continues the effort to fix our handling of out-of-line definitions
of constrained templates.
This is a recommit of 60bee9ff5445.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146178
This temporarily reverts commit
60bee9ff544541e83ffbd4be31923d0e8b644690.
The diff will be recommitted once the newly discovered
regressions are fixed.
This diff switches the approach to comparison of constraint expressions
to the new one based on template args substitution.
It continues the effort to fix our handling of out-of-line definitions
of constrained templates.
The associated GitHub issue: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61414
Test plan:
1/ ninja check-all
2/ bootstrapped Clang passes tests
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146178
Seemingly we never tested this, but the constraint on a NTTP was being
swtiched to the 'instantiated' version, but constraints need to be
relative to the 'top level', so this was causing us to not be able to
check the constraint on final use.
This patch corrects the issue by making the constraint created with the
un-instantiated version in the case of dependent constraint attachment.
Fixes: #61777
Since P0857, part of C++20, a *lambda-expression* can contain a
*requires-clause* after its *template-parameter-list*.
While support for this was added as part of
eccc734a69c0c012ae3160887b65a535b35ead3e, one specific case isn't
handled properly, where the *requires-clause* consists of an
instantiation of a boolean variable template. This is due to a
diagnostic check which was written with the assumption that a
*requires-clause* can never be followed by a left parenthesis. This
assumption no longer holds for lambdas.
This diagnostic check would then attempt to perform a "recovery", but it
does so in a valid parse state, resulting in an invalid parse state
instead!
This patch adds a special case when parsing requires clauses of lambda
templates, to skip this diagnostic check.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61278
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61387
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146140
As reported in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/49192,
we did a pretty poor job diagnosing cases where someone forgot 'auto', a
nd is probably in the middle of a variable declaration. This patch
makes us properly diagnose in cases where the next token is a reference,
or CVR qualifier.
template-template parameters. Although it effects whether a template can be
used as an argument for another template, the constraint seems not to
be checked, nor other major implementations (GCC, MSVC, et al.) check it.
Additionally, Part-A of the document seems to have been implemented.
So mark P0857R0 as completed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134128
Reported as it showed up as a constriants failure after the deferred
instantiation patch, we were checking constraints TWICE after overload
resolution. The first is during overload resolution, the second is when
diagnosing a use.
This patch modifies DiagnoseUseOfDecl to skip the trailing requires
clause check in some cases. First, of course, after choosing a candidate
after overload resolution.
The second is when evaluating a shadow using constructor, which had its
constraints checked when picking a constructor (as this is ALWAYS an
overload situation!).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135772
This reverts commit 95d94a67755620c0a2871ac6f056ca8e9731d5e9.
This implements the deferred concepts instantiation, which should allow
the libstdc++ ranges to properly compile, and for the CRTP to work for
constrained functions.
Since the last attempt, this has fixed the issues from @wlei and
@mordante.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907
Template arguments of template and declaration kind were being profiled
only by their canonical properties, which would cause incorrect
uniquing of constrained AutoTypes, leading to a crash in some cases.
This exposed some places in CheckTemplateArgumentList where non-canonical
arguments where being pushed into the resulting converted list.
We also throw in some asserts to catch early and explain the crashes.
Note that the fix for the 'declaration' kind is untestable at this point,
because there should be no cases right now in the AST where we try
to unique a non-canonical converted template argument.
This fixes GH55567.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133072
This reverts commit d483730d8c3fa2e0d4192b2f3c61c761b124e6ad.
This allegedly breaks a significant part of facebooks internal build.
Reverting while we wait for them to provide a reproducer of this from
@wlei.
This reverts commit 258c3aee54e11bc5c5d8ac137eb15e8d5bbcc7e4.
This should fix the libc++ issue that caused the revert, by re-designing
slightly how we determined when we should evaluate the constraints.
Additionally, many of the other components to the original patch (the
NFC parts) were committed separately to shrink the size of this patch
for review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907
This reverts commit befa8cf087dbb8159a4d9dc8fa4d6748d6d5049a.
Apparently this breaks some libc++ builds with an apparent assertion,
so I'm looking into that .
This reverts commit d4d47e574ecae562ab32f8ac7fa3f4d424bb6574.
This fixes the lldb crash that was observed by ensuring that our
friend-'template contains reference to' TreeTransform properly handles a
TemplateDecl.
This reverts commit 2f207439521d62d9551b2884158368e8b34084e5 because it
triggers an assertion when building an LLDB test program:
Assertion failed: (InstantiatingSpecializations.empty() && "failed to
clean up an InstantiatingTemplate?"), function ~Sema, file
/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/Sema.cpp,
line 458.
More details in https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907.
This reverts commit a425cac31e2e4cee8e14b7b9a99c8ba17c1ebb52.
There is another libc++ test, that this time causes us to hit an
assertion. Reverting, likely for a while this time.
This includes a fix for the libc++ issue I ran across with friend
declarations not properly being identified as overloads.
This reverts commit 45c07db31cc76802a1a2e41bed1ce9c1b8198181.
This reverts commit a97899108e495147985e5e9492e742d51d5cc97a.
The patch caused some problems with the libc++ `__range_adaptor_closure`
that I haven't been able to figure out the cause of, so I am reverting
while I figure out whether this is a solvable problem/issue with the
CFE, or libc++ depending on an older 'incorrect' behavior.
This reverts commit 0c31da48389754822dc3eecc4723160c295b9ab2.
I've solved the issue with the PointerUnion by making the
`FunctionTemplateDecl` pointer be a NamedDecl, that could be a
`FunctionDecl` or `FunctionTemplateDecl` depending. This is enforced
with an assert.
This reverts commit 4b6c2cd647e9e5a147954886338f97ffb6a1bcfb.
The patch caused numerous ARM 32 bit build failures, since we added a
5th item to the PointerUnion, and went over the 2-bits available in the
32 bit pointers.
As reported here: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/44178
Concepts are not supposed to be instantiated until they are checked, so
this patch implements that and goes through significant amounts of work
to make sure we properly re-instantiate the concepts correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119544
function candidates
See: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54379
I tried to see if I can reuse ResolveAddressOfOverloadedFunction for
explicit function instantiation and so I managed to hit this ICE.
Bug was the diagnostic required an argument (%0) and specific code path
didn't pass an argument.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121646
