In preparation of making `-Wreturn-type` default to an error (as there
is virtually no situation where you’d *want* to fall off the end of a
function that is supposed to return a value), this patch fixes tests
that have relied on this being only a warning, of which there seem
to be 3 kinds:
1. Tests which for no apparent reason have a function that triggers the
warning.
I suspect that a lot of these were on accident (or from before the
warning was introduced), since a lot of people will open issues w/ their
problematic code in the `main` function (which is the one case where you
don’t need to return from a non-void function, after all...), which
someone will then copy, possibly into a namespace, possibly renaming it,
the end result of that being that you end up w/ something that
definitely is not `main` anymore, but which still is declared as
returning `int`, and which still has no return statement (another reason
why I think this might apply to a lot of these is because usually the
actual return type of such problematic functions is quite literally
`int`).
A lot of these are really old tests that don’t use `-verify`, which is
why no-one noticed or had to care about the extra warning that was
already being emitted by them until now.
2. Tests which test either `-Wreturn-type`, `[[noreturn]]`, or what
codegen and sanitisers do whenever you do fall off the end of a
function.
3. Tests where I struggle to figure out what is even being tested
(usually because they’re Objective-C tests, and I don’t know
Objective-C), whether falling off the end of a function matters in the
first place, and tests where actually spelling out an expression to
return would be rather cumbersome (e.g. matrix types currently don’t
support list initialisation, so I can’t write e.g. `return {}`).
For tests that fall into categories 2 and 3, I just added
`-Wno-error=return-type` to the `RUN` lines and called it a day. This
was especially necessary for the former since `-Wreturn-type` is an
analysis-based warning, meaning that it is currently impossible to test
for more than one occurrence of it in the same compilation if it
defaults to an error since the analysis pass is skipped for subsequent
functions as soon as an error is emitted.
I’ve also added `-Werror=return-type` to a few tests that I had already
updated as this patch was previously already making the warning an error
by default, but we’ve decided to split that into two patches instead.
This pr refactors most tests that use RAV to use DRAV instead; this also
has the nice effect of testing both the RAV and DRAV implementations at
the same time w/o having to duplicate all of our AST visitor tests.
Some tests rely on features that DRAV doesn’t support (mainly post-order
traversal), so those haven’t been migrated. At the same time,
`TestVisitor` is now a DRAV, so I’ve had to introduce a new
`CTRPTestVisitor` for any tests that need to use RAV directly.
Since `raw_string_ostream` doesn't own the string buffer, it is
desirable (in terms of memory safety) for users to directly reference
the string buffer rather than use `raw_string_ostream::str()`.
Work towards TODO item to remove `raw_string_ostream::str()`.
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
This affects overloaded operators, which are represented by a
CXXOperatorCallExpr whose first child is always a DeclRefExpr referring to the
operator. For infix, postfix and call operators we want the first argument
to be traversed before the operator.
Reviewers: arphaman
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37200
llvm-svn: 312633
Summary:
We need to specialize this because RecursiveASTVisitor visits template
template parameters after the templated declaration, unlike the order in
which they appear in the source code.
Reviewers: arphaman
Reviewed By: arphaman
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36998
llvm-svn: 312631
This commit adds the base AST source selection component to the refactoring
library. AST selection is represented using a tree of SelectedASTNode values.
Each selected node gets its own selection kind, which can actually be None even
in the middle of tree (e.g. statement in a macro whose child is in a macro
argument). The initial version constructs a "raw" selection tree, without
applying filters and canonicalisation operations to the nodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35012
llvm-svn: 311655
