This commit handles the following types:
- clang::ExternalASTSource
- clang::TargetInfo
- clang::ASTContext
- clang::SourceManager
- clang::FileManager
Part of cleanup #151026
Handles clang::DiagnosticsEngine and clang::DiagnosticIDs.
For DiagnosticIDs, this mostly migrates from `new DiagnosticIDs` to
convenience method `DiagnosticIDs::create()`.
Part of cleanup https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/151026
This switches to `makeIntrusiveRefCnt<FileSystem>` where creating a new
object, and to passing/returning by `IntrusiveRefCntPtr<FileSystem>`
instead of `FileSystem*` or `FileSystem&`, when dealing with existing
objects.
Part of cleanup #151026.
This reverts commit e2a885537f11f8d9ced1c80c2c90069ab5adeb1d. Build failures were fixed right away and reverting the original commit without the fixes breaks the build again.
The `DiagnosticOptions` class is currently intrusively
reference-counted, which makes reasoning about its lifetime very
difficult in some cases. For example, `CompilerInvocation` owns the
`DiagnosticOptions` instance (wrapped in `llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr`) and
only exposes an accessor returning `DiagnosticOptions &`. One would
think this gives `CompilerInvocation` exclusive ownership of the object,
but that's not the case:
```c++
void shareOwnership(CompilerInvocation &CI) {
llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<DiagnosticOptions> CoOwner = &CI.getDiagnosticOptions();
// ...
}
```
This is a perfectly valid pattern that is being actually used in the
codebase.
I would like to ensure the ownership of `DiagnosticOptions` by
`CompilerInvocation` is guaranteed to be exclusive. This can be
leveraged for a copy-on-write optimization later on. This PR changes
usages of `DiagnosticOptions` across `clang`, `clang-tools-extra` and
`lldb` to not be intrusively reference-counted.
This PR makes it so that `CompilerInvocation` needs to be provided to
`CompilerInstance` on construction. There are a couple of benefits in my
view:
* Making it impossible to mis-use some `CompilerInstance` APIs. For
example there are cases, where `createDiagnostics()` was called before
`setInvocation()`, causing the `DiagnosticEngine` to use the
default-constructed `DiagnosticOptions` instead of the intended ones.
* This shrinks `CompilerInstance`'s state space.
* This makes it possible to access **the** invocation in
`CompilerInstance`'s constructor (to be used in a follow-up).
This also does some cleanups, I am happy to undo them (or send as
separate patches):
- Change the early exit to stop only once we hit an expansion inside the
main file, to make sure we keep following the nested expansions.
- Add more tests to cover all the cases mentioned in the implementation
- Drop the adjustments for prev/next tokens. We do the final checks
based on the expansion locations anyway, so any intermediate mapping
was a no-op.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154335
The Annotations helper class does not have a gtest or gmock dependency, but because it's bundled with the rest of TestingSupport, it gets one. By splitting it out, a target can use it without being forced to use LLVM's copy of gtest.
Reviewed By: GMNGeoffrey, sammccall, gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141175
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
A few cases were not handled correctly. Notably:
#define ID(X) X
#define HIDE a ID(b)
HIDE
spelledForExpanded() would claim HIDE is an equivalent range of the 'b' it
contains, despite the fact that HIDE also covers 'a'.
While trying to fix this bug, I found findCommonRangeForMacroArgs hard
to understand (both the implementation and how it's used in spelledForExpanded).
It relies on details of the SourceLocation graph that are IMO fairly obscure.
So I've added/revised quite a lot of comments and made some naming tweaks.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/1289
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134618
`expandedTokens(SourceRange)` used to do a binary search to get the
expanded tokens belonging to a source range. Each binary search uses
`isBeforeInTranslationUnit` to order two source locations. This is
inherently very slow.
By profiling clangd we found out that users like clangd::SelectionTree
spend 95% of time in `isBeforeInTranslationUnit`. Also it is worth
noting that users of `expandedTokens(SourceRange)` majorly use ranges
provided by AST to query this funciton. The ranges provided by AST are
token ranges (starting at the beginning of a token and ending at the
beginning of another token).
Therefore we can avoid the binary search in majority of the cases by
maintaining an index of ExpandedToken by their SourceLocations. We still
do binary search for ranges which are not token ranges but such
instances are quite low.
Performance:
`~/build/bin/clangd --check=clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp`
Before: Took 2:10s to complete.
Now: Took 1:13s to complete.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99086
Summary:
This allows efficiently accessing all expansions (without iterating over each
token and searching), and also identifying tokens within a range that are
affected by the preprocessor (which is how clangd will use it).
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84009
Summary:
Same restrictions apply as in the other direction: macro arguments are
not supported yet, only full macro expansions can be mapped.
Taking over from https://reviews.llvm.org/D72581.
Reviewers: gribozavr2, sammccall
Reviewed By: gribozavr2
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77209
Summary:
Our previous definition of "top-level" was too informal, and didn't
allow for overlapping macros that each directly produce expanded tokens.
See D77507 for previous discussion.
Fixes http://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45428
Reviewers: kadircet, vabridgers
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77615
Summary: Useful when positions are used to target nodes, with before/after ambiguity.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, kbobyrev
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71356
This reverts commit 19daa21f841ad45290c923689ee3d25198651a4c.
It causes a bunch of failures on a bot that I've been unable to
reproduce so far:
http://45.33.8.238/mac/3308/step_7.txt
Summary:
The exclusive-claim model is successful at resolving conflicts over tokens
between parent/child or siblings. However claims at the spelled-token
level do the wrong thing for macro expansions, where siblings can be
equally associated with the macro invocation.
Moreover, any model that only uses the endpoints in a range can fail when
a macro invocation occurs inside the node.
To address this, we use the existing TokenBuffer in more depth.
Claims are expressed in terms of expanded tokens, so there is no need to worry
about macros, includes etc.
Once we know which expanded tokens were claimed, they are mapped onto
spelled tokens for hit-testing.
This mapping is fairly flexible, currently the handling of macros is
pretty simple (map macro args onto spellings, other macro expansions onto the
macro name token).
This mapping is in principle token-by-token for correctness (though
there's some batching for performance).
The aggregation of the selection enum is now more principled as we need to be
able to aggregate several hit-test results together.
For simplicity i removed the ability to determine selectedness of TUDecl.
(That was originally implemented in 90a5bf92ff97b1, but doesn't seem to be very
important or worth the complexity any longer).
The expandedTokens(SourceLocation) helper could be added locally, but seems to
make sense on TokenBuffer.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/202
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/126
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits, ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70512
Summary:
Returns the first token in every mapping where the token is an identifier.
This API is required to be able to highlight macro expansions in clangd.
Reviewers: hokein, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66470
llvm-svn: 369385
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368942
Summary:
Preivously we would only discard it if we failed to parse parameter lists.
If we do not consume the body, parser sees tokens inside directive. In
turn, this leads to spurious diagnostics and a crash in TokenBuffer, see
the added tests.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65517
llvm-svn: 367530
Summary:
This change makes sure we have a single mapping for each macro expansion,
even if the result of expansion was empty.
To achieve that, we take information from PPCallbacks::MacroExpands into
account. Previously we relied only on source locations of expanded tokens.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62953
llvm-svn: 364236
Summary: Used in clangd for a code tweak that expands a macro.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62954
llvm-svn: 363698
Summary:
TokenBuffer stores the list of tokens for a file obtained after
preprocessing. This is a base building block for syntax trees,
see [1] for the full proposal on syntax trees.
This commits also starts a new sub-library of ClangTooling, which
would be the home for the syntax trees and syntax-tree-based refactoring
utilities.
[1]: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-February/061414.html
Reviewers: gribozavr, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgrang, riccibruno, Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59887
llvm-svn: 361148
