We've been shipping <coroutine> since LLVM 14, so LLVM 17 won't ship
the <experimental/coroutine> header per our policy for removing TSes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108697
This changes the mechanism for verbose termination (again!) to make it
support compile-time customization in addition to link-time customization,
which is important for users who need fine-grained control over what code
gets generated around sites that call the verbose termination handler.
This concern had been raised to me both privately by prospecting users
and in https://llvm.org/D140944, so I think it is clearly worth fixing.
We still support _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_CUSTOM_VERBOSE_ABORT_PROVIDED for
a limited time since the same functionality can be achieved by overriding
the _LIBCPP_VERBOSE_ABORT macro.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141326
The paper
- P2286R8 Formatting ranges
is fully implemented modulo its feature test macro. This macro has been
revised by
- LWG3750 Too many papers bump __cpp_lib_format
The new macro depends on
- P2585R0 Improving default container formatting
This paper revises parts of P2286R8 and adds new formatter
specializations. The specialization for debug strings has some wording
issues, which is addresses in this paper
- P2733R0 Fix handling of empty specifiers in std::format
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142153
- implement `std::ranges::split_view` (last c++20 view)
- Work in process on testing iterator/sentinel, but since we are
getting closer to the deadline, I'd like to send the review early
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142063
This has multiple benefits:
- The optimizations are also performed for the `ranges::` versions of the algorithms
- Code duplication is reduced
- it is simpler to add this optimization for other segmented iterators,
like `ranges::join_view::iterator`
- Algorithm code is removed from `<deque>`
Reviewed By: ldionne, huixie90, #libc
Spies: mstorsjo, sstefan1, EricWF, libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132505
All C++20 Ranges papers and LWG issues are done, with the exception of
https://wg21.link/P2210R2 ("Superior String Splitting"), and marked as
such.
All of these were already implemented prior to this patch except bumping
the feature test macro `__cpp_lib_ranges` as required by
https://wg21.link/P2325R3 ("Views should not be required to be default
constructible"). Note that, even though P2325R3 was voted into C++23, it
was voted with a recommendation for vendors to retroactively apply the
change to C++20 (see https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/1007).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139900
`subrange` is also a `tuple-like`. To avoid the add entire `subrange` dependencies to `tuple-like`, we need forward declaration of `subrange`. However, the class template constraints of `subrange` currently requires `__iterator/concepts.h`, which requires `<concepts>`. The problem is that currently `tuple-like` is used in several different places, including libc++ extension for pair constructors. we don't want to add `<concepts>` to pair and other stuff. So this change also created several small headers that `subrange`'s declaration needed inside `__iterator/concepts/`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136268
This is a preparation for the upcoming LLVM 17 release.
Reviewed By: ldionne, philnik, avogelsgesang, jloser, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141304
Some of the calendar types have landed before, this adds the missing
set. Note this does not complete the implementation of the chrono
formatters.
This removes the `chrono` header for some transitive include in C++17
mode. This is needed to avoid inclusion cycles.
Partially implements:
- P1361 Integration of chrono with text formatting
- P2372 Fixing locale handling in chrono formatters
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137022
This patch removes the base template implementation for std::char_traits.
If my reading of http://eel.is/c++draft/char.traits is correct, the
Standard mandates that the library provides specializations for several
types like char and wchar_t, but not any implementation in the base
template. Indeed, such an implementation is bound to be incorrect for
most types anyways, since things like `eof()` and `int_type` will definitely
have to be customized.
Since the base template implementation should not have worked for anyone,
this shouldn't be a breaking change (I expect that anyone defining a
custom character type today will already have to provide their own
specialization of char_traits). However, since we're aware of some users
of char_traits for unsigned char and signed char, we're keeping those two
specializations around for two releases to give people some time to migrate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138307
The ctype mask for newlib/picolibc is fully saturated, so __regex_word
has to overlap with one of the values. This commit uses the same workaround
as bionic did (uint16_t for char_class_type inside regex_traits). It
should be possible to have libc++ provide the default rune table instead,
but that will require a new mechanism to detect newlib inside __config
since the header defining the newlib/picolibc macros has not been included
yet inside __config. Doing it this way also avoids duplicating the ctype
table for newlib, reducing the global data size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138195
This doesn't affect our ABI because `std::string::substr()` isn't in the dylib and the mangling of `substr() const` and `substr() const&` are different.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, var-const, avogelsgesang, #libc
Spies: arphaman, huixie90, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131668
This commit deprecates <experimental/memory_resource> since we now ship the non-experimental
version of it. Per the libc++ policy [1], we are deprecating the experimental feature in
upcoming LLVM 16 and will remove it entirely in LLVM 18.
[1]: https://libcxx.llvm.org/DesignDocs/ExperimentalFeatures.html#id4
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: EricWF, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136245
We've said that we'll remove `std::function` from C++03 in LLVM 16, so we might as well do it now before we forget.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Mordante
Spies: jloser, Mordante, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135868
Implements:
- P2291R3 Add Constexpr Modifiers to Functions to_chars and from_chars for
Integral Types in <charconv> Header
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131317
This patch is the rebase and squash of three earlier patches.
It supersedes all three of them.
- D47111: experimental monotonic_buffer_resource.
- D47358: experimental pool resources.
- D47360: Copy std::experimental::pmr to std::pmr.
The significant difference between this patch and the-sum-of-those-three
is that this patch does not add `std::experimental::pmr::monotonic_buffer_resource`
and so on. This patch simply adds the C++17 standard facilities, and
leaves the `std::experimental` namespace entirely alone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89057
Implementing the paper
P2291R3 Add Constexpr Modifiers to Functions to_chars and from_chars for
Integral Types in <charconv> Header
Gives issues in language versions prior to C++17. As suggested in
D131855 disable the code prior to C++17. This removes libc++'s
extension.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc_vendors, #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133216
This is a breaking change. If you were passing one of those three runtimes
in LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS, you need to start passing them in LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES
instead. The runtimes in LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES will start being built using
the "bootstrapping build" instead, which means that they will be built
using the just-built Clang. This is usually what you wanted anyway.
If you were using LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=all with the explicit goal of
building these three runtimes, you can now use LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES=all
and these runtimes will be built using the bootstrapping build.
NOTE: This is a re-application of 887b8bd733ea which had been reverted
in 6b03a4fea0b4 because it broke the Sphinx documentation publishers.
The Sphinx documentation publishers have now been moved to using
the runtimes build, so this should not be an issue anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132480
Now that all jobs have moved over to the new style of Lit configuration,
we can remove all traces of the legacy testing configuration system.
This includes:
- Cache settings that are not honored or useful anymore
- Several CMake options that were only useful in the context of the
legacy Lit configuration system
- A bunch of Python support code that is not used anymore
- The legacy lit.cfg.in files themselves
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134650
This is a breaking change. If you were passing one of those three runtimes
in LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS, you need to start passing them in LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES
instead. The runtimes in LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES will start being built using
the "bootstrapping build" instead, which means that they will be built
using the just-built Clang. This is usually what you wanted anyway.
If you were using LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=all with the explicit goal of
building these three runtimes, you can now use LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES=all
and these runtimes will be built using the bootstrapping build.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132480
In https://llvm.org/D56913, we added an emulation for the __atomic_always_lock_free
compiler builtin when compiling in Freestanding mode. However, the emulation
did (and could not) give exactly the same answer as the compiler builtin,
which led to a potential ABI break for e.g. enum classes.
After speaking to the original author of D56913, we agree that the correct
behavior is to instead always use the compiler builtin, since that provides
a more accurate answer, and __atomic_always_lock_free is a purely front-end
builtin which doesn't require any runtime support. Furthermore, it is
available regardless of the Standard mode (see https://godbolt.org/z/cazf3ssYY).
However, this patch does constitute an ABI break. As shown by https://godbolt.org/z/1eoex6zdK:
- In LLVM <= 11.0.1, an atomic<enum class with 1 byte> would not contain a lock byte.
- In LLVM >= 12.0.0, an atomic<enum class with 1 byte> would contain a lock byte.
This patch breaks the ABI again to bring it back to 1 byte, which seems
like the correct thing to do.
Fixes#57440
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133377
It seems these includes are still provided by the sub headers, so it only
removes the duplicates.
There is no change in the list of includes, but the change affects the
modular build. By not having the includes in the top-level header the
module map has changed. This uncovers missing includes in the tests
and missing exports in the module map. This causes the huge amount of
changes in the patch.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133252
This change implements the C library dependent portions of P0482R6
(char8_t: A type for UTF-8 characters and strings (Revision 6)) by
declaring std::c8rtomb() and std::mbrtoc8() in the <cuchar> header
when implementations are provided by the C library as specified by
WG14 N2653 (char8_t: A type for UTF-8 characters and strings
(Revision 1)) as adopted for C23.
A _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_C8RTOMB_MBRTOC8 macro is defined by the libc++ __config
header unless it is known that the C library provides these functions
in the current compilation mode. This macro is used for testing purposes
and may be of use to libc++ users. At present, the only C library known
to implement these functions is GNU libc as of its 2.36 release.
Reviewed By: ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130946
