That type trait represents whether move-assigning an object is
equivalent to destroying it and then move-constructing a new one from
the same argument. This will be useful in a few places where we may want
to destroy + construct instead of doing an assignment, in particular
when implementing some container operations in terms of relocation.
This is effectively adding a library emulation of P2786R12's
is_replaceable trait, similarly to what we do for trivial relocation.
Eventually, we can replace this library emulation by the real
compiler-backed trait.
This is building towards #129328.
Currently, the library-internal feature test macros are only defined if
the feature is not available, and always have the prefix
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_`. This patch changes that, so that they are always
defined and have the prefix `_LIBCPP_HAS_` instead. This changes the
canonical use of these macros to `#if _LIBCPP_HAS_FEATURE`, which means
that using an undefined macro (e.g. due to a missing include) is
diagnosed now. While this is rather unlikely currently, a similar change
in `<__configuration/availability.h>` caught a few bugs. This also
improves readability, since it removes the double-negation of `#ifndef
_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_FEATURE`.
The current patch only touches the macros defined in `<__config>`. If
people are happy with this approach, I'll make a follow-up PR to also
change the macros defined in `<__config_site>`.
This patch adds a large number of missing includes in the libc++ headers
and the test suite. Those were found as part of the effort to move
towards a mostly monolithic top-level std module.
This re-formats a few headers that had become out-of-sync with respect
to formatting since we ran clang-format on the whole codebase. There's
surprisingly few instances of it.
Instead of using **this in error messages for std::expected monadic
operations, use value(). As shown in LWG3969, **this can trigger
unintended ADL and while it's only an error message, we might as
well be ADL-correct there too.
Co-authored-by: Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com>
fixes#92676
So right now clang does not like
```
std::expected<std::any, int> e1;
auto e2 = e1;
```
So basically when clang tries to do overload resolution of `auto e2 =
e1;`
It finds
```
expected(const expected&); // 1. This is OK
expected(const expected<_Up, _OtherErr>&) requires __can_convert; // 2. This needs to check its constraints
```
Then in `__can_convert`, one of the check is
```
_Not<is_constructible<_Tp, expected<_Up, _OtherErr>&>>
```
which is checking
```
is_constructible<std::any, expected<_Up, _OtherErr>&>
```
Then it looks at `std::any`'s constructor
```
template < class _ValueType,
class _Tp = decay_t<_ValueType>,
class = enable_if_t< !is_same<_Tp, any>::value && !__is_inplace_type<_ValueType>::value &&
is_copy_constructible<_Tp>::value> >
any(_ValueType&& __value);
```
In the above, `is_copy_constructible<_Tp>` expands to
```
is_copy_constructible<std::expected<std::any, int>>
```
And the above goes back to the original thing we asked : copy the
`std::expected`, which goes to the overload resolution again.
```
expected(const expected&);
expected(const expected<_Up, _OtherErr>&) requires __can_convert;
```
So the second overload results in a logical cycle.
I am not a language lawyer. We could argue that clang should give up on
the second overload which has logical cycle, as the first overload is a
perfect match.
Anyway, the fix in this patch tries to short-circuiting the second
overload's constraint check: that is, if the argument matches exact same
`expected<T, E>`, we give up immediately and let the copy constructor to
deal with it
These headers have become very small by using compiler builtins, often
containing only two declarations. This merges these headers, since
there doesn't seem to be much of a benefit keeping them separate.
Specifically, `is_{,_nothrow,_trivially}{assignable,constructible}` are
kept and the `copy`, `move` and `default` versions of these type traits
are moved in to the respective headers.
Currently std::expected can have some padding bytes in its tail due to
[[no_unique_address]]. Those padding bytes can be used by other objects.
For example, in the current implementation:
sizeof(std::expected<std::optional<int>, bool>) ==
sizeof(std::expected<std::expected<std::optional<int>, bool>, bool>)
As a result, the data layout of an
std::expected<std::expected<std::optional<int>, bool>, bool>
can look like this:
+-- optional "has value" flag
| +--padding
/---int---\ | |
00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00
| |
| +- "outer" expected "has value" flag
|
+- expected "has value" flag
This is problematic because `emplace()`ing the "inner" expected can not
only overwrite the "inner" expected "has value" flag (issue #68552) but
also the tail padding where other objects might live.
This patch fixes the problem by ensuring that std::expected has no tail
padding, which is achieved by conditional usage of [[no_unique_address]]
based on the tail padding that this would create.
This is an ABI breaking change because the following property changes:
sizeof(std::expected<std::optional<int>, bool>) <
sizeof(std::expected<std::expected<std::optional<int>, bool>, bool>)
Before the change, this relation didn't hold. After the change, the relation
does hold, which means that the size of std::expected in these cases increases
after this patch. The data layout will change in the following cases where
tail padding can be reused by other objects:
class foo : std::expected<std::optional<int>, bool> {
bool b;
};
or using [[no_unique_address]]:
struct foo {
[[no_unique_address]] std::expected<std::optional<int>, bool> e;
bool b;
};
The vendor communication is handled in #70820.
Fixes: #70494
Co-authored-by: philnik777 <nikolasklauser@berlin.de>
Co-authored-by: Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com>
This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.
This patch was generated with:
find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i
A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
The calls to std::construct_at might overwrite the previously set
__has_value_ flag in the case where the flag is overlapping with
the actual value or error being stored (since we use [[no_unique_address]]).
To fix this issue, this patch ensures that we initialize the
__has_value_ flag after we call std::construct_at.
Fixes#68552
POSIX allows certain macros to exist with generic names (i.e. refresh(), move(), and erase()) to exist in `curses.h` which conflict with functions found in std::filesystem, among others. This patch undefs the macros in question and adds them to LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS and LIBCPP_POP_MACROS.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147356
Replace most uses of `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` with
`_LIBCPP_ASSERT_UNCATEGORIZED`.
This is done as a prerequisite to introducing hardened mode to libc++.
The idea is to make enabling assertions an opt-in with (somewhat)
fine-grained controls over which categories of assertions are enabled.
The vast majority of assertions are currently uncategorized; the new
macro will allow turning on `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` (the underlying mechanism
for all kinds of assertions) without enabling all the uncategorized
assertions (in the future; this patch preserves the current behavior).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153816
This reverts commit ebc111b08bddca55d5f7e560a20bdb2c913d80cb.
Sorry, I forgot to append Phabricator reversion when land D140911, I try to revert this change and reland.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150793
We changed the `abort` calls when trying to throw exceptions in `-fno-exceptions` mode to `__verbose_abort` calls, which removes the dependency in most files.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: dim, emaste, mikhail.ramalho, smeenai, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146076
This results in proper error messages instead of just an abort.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: #libc_vendors, smeenai, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141222
Other macros that disable parts of the library are named `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_WHATEVER`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143163
Having an ODR violation with `__exception_guard` seems to be problematic in LTO builds. To avoid the ODR violation, give the class different names for exception/no-exceptions mode and have an alias to the correct class.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, alexfh
Spies: aeubanks, dblaikie, joanahalili, alexfh, rupprecht, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143071
__exception_guard is a no-op in -fno-exceptions mode to produce better code-gen. This means that we don't provide the strong exception guarantees. However, Clang doesn't generate cleanup code with exceptions disabled, so even if we wanted to provide the strong exception guarantees we couldn't. This is also only relevant for constructs with a stack of -fexceptions > -fno-exceptions > -fexceptions code, since the exception can't be caught where exceptions are disabled. While -fexceptions > -fno-exceptions is quite common (e.g. libc++.dylib > -fno-exceptions), having another layer with exceptions enabled seems a lot less common, especially one that tries to catch an exception through -fno-exceptions code.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56783
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, huixie90, #libc
Spies: EricWF, alexfh, hans, joanahalili, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133661
