Implement
- LWG4053 Unary call to `std::views::repeat` does not decay the argument
- LWG4054 Repeating a `repeat_view` should repeat the view
Signed-off-by: yronglin <yronglin777@gmail.com>
I've structured this into a series of commits for even easier reviewing,
if that helps. I could easily split this up into separate PRs if
desired, but as this is low-risk with simple edits, I thought one PR
would be easiest.
* Drop unnecessary semicolons after function definitions.
* Cleanup comment typos.
* Cleanup `static_assert` typos.
* Cleanup test code typos.
+ There should be no functional changes, assuming I've changed all
occurrences.
* ~~Fix massive test code typos.~~
+ This was a real problem, but needed more surgery. I reverted those
changes here, and @philnik777 is fixing this properly with #73444.
* clang-formatting as requested by the CI.
We were incorrectly deducing the return type of size() because we were
not using ternary operators in the implementation (as the spec says).
Instead of deducing the common type of the expressions in the spec, we
would deduce potentially different return types and fail to compile.
Fixes#67551
Those were found while trying to enable configurations like no-threads
and no-localization with Clang modules enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153977
Implement P2494R2 `Relaxing range adaptors to allow for move only types`
https://open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2494r2.html#wording-ftm
According to the words in P2494R2, I haven't add new test for `drop_while_view`, `take_while_view` and `filter_view`, because these views has the requirement that the predicate is an `indirect_unary_predicate`, which requires that the predicate is `copy_constructible`, so they still can't accept move only types as predicate.
```
[P2483R0] also suggests future work to relax the requirements on the predicate types stored by standard views. This paper does not perform this relaxation, as the copy constructibility requirement is enshrined in the indirect callable concepts ([indirectcallable.indirectinvocable]). Thus, while this paper modifies the views that currently use copyable-box for user provided predicates, it only does so to apply the rename of the exposition-only type to movable-box; it does not change any of the constraints on those views. It does, however, relax the requirements on invocables accepted by the transform family of views, because those are not constrained using the indirect callable concepts.
```
Reviewed By: #libc, var-const
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151629
One of the overload of the constructors should check Bound is not unreachable_sentinel_t, instead of the Start
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150206
This has been done using the following command
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)size_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
And manually removed some false positives in std/depr/depr.c.headers.
The `std` module doesn't export `::size_t`, this is a preparation for that module.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, EricWF, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146088
This makes it a lot easier to specialize traits types for it, like __segmented_iterator_traits.
Reviewed By: var-const, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141454
Our static analyzer likes to warn when loop bodies are never executed, which is true for `make_string<T>("")`. Build the result with `basic_string`'s iterator-pair constructor instead, which is simpler (one liner), faster (single pass), and doesn't trigger the warning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141263
implement `std::ranges::basic_istream_view` and `std::views::istream`. Although the view itself is constexpr,
the constructor argument is a base class std::istream where its ctor/dtor are not constexpr. So no tests are performed in
constexpr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133317
There are a handful of standard library types that are intended
to support CTAD but don't need any explicit deduction guides to
do so.
This patch adds a dummy deduction guide to those types to suppress
-Wctad-maybe-unsupported (which gets emitted in user code).
This is a re-application of the original patch by Eric Fiselier in
fcd549a7d828 which had been reverted due to reasons lost at this point.
I also added the macro to a few more types. Reviving this patch was
prompted by the discussion on https://llvm.org/D133425.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133535
When we ship LLVM 16, <ranges> won't be considered experimental anymore.
We might as well do this sooner rather than later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132151
This only adds the customization point object (which isn't pipeable),
the view itself has already been implemented previously.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124978
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
... it's easier to suppress warnings internally, where we can detect the compiler.
* Rename `TEST_COMPILER_C1XX` to `TEST_COMPILER_MSVC`
* Rename all `TEST_WORKAROUND_C1XX_<meow>` to `TEST_WORKAROUND_MSVC_<meow>`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117422
... from testing with MSVC's STL. Mostly truncation warnings and variables that are only used in `LIBCPP_ASSERT`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116878
Some individual test files verify the CPO under test satisfies
`semiregular` concept. This is redundant since it is already part of the test
in verifying whether the entity is indeed a CPO in
`libcxx/test/std/library/description/conventions/customization.point.object/cpo.compile.pass.cpp`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116173
The existing tests for transform_view::iterator weren't quite right,
and can be simplified now that we have more of C++20 available to us.
Having done that, let's use the same pattern for iota_view::iterator
as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110774
Since we officially don't support several older compilers now, we can
drop a lot of the markup in the test suite. This helps keep the test
suite simple and makes sure that UNSUPPORTED annotations don't rot.
This is the first patch of a series that will remove annotations for
compilers that are now unsupported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107787
