6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Louis Dionne
bf1666fb0b
[libc++] Drop support for the C++20 Synchronization Library before C++20 (#82008)
When we initially implemented the C++20 synchronization library, we
reluctantly accepted for the implementation to be backported to C++03
upon request from the person who provided the patch. This was when we
were only starting to have experience with the issues this can create,
so we flinched. Nowadays, we have a much stricter stance about not
backporting features to previous standards.

We have recently started fixing several bugs (and near bugs) in our
implementation of the synchronization library. A recurring theme during
these reviews has been how difficult to understand the current code is,
and upon inspection it becomes clear that being able to use a few recent
C++ features (in particular lambdas) would help a great deal. The code
would still be pretty intricate, but it would be a lot easier to reason
about the flow of callbacks through things like
__thread_poll_with_backoff.

As a result, this patch drops support for the synchronization library
before C++20. This makes us more strictly conforming and opens the door
to major simplifications, in particular around atomic_wait which was
supported all the way to C++03.

This change will probably have some impact on downstream users, however
since the C++20 synchronization library was added only in LLVM 10 (~3
years ago) and it's quite a niche feature, the set of people trying to
use this part of the library before C++20 should be reasonably small.
2024-07-31 17:53:09 -04:00
Louis Dionne
9ddedf07ed
[libc++] Deprecate the C++20 synchronization library before C++20 (#86410)
When we initially implemented the C++20 synchronization library, we
reluctantly accepted for the implementation to be backported to C++03
upon request from the person who provided the patch. This was when we
were only starting to have experience with the issues this can create,
so we flinched. Nowadays, we have a much stricter stance about not
backporting features to previous standards.

We have recently started fixing several bugs (and near bugs) in our
implementation of the synchronization library. A recurring theme during
these reviews has been how difficult to understand the current code is,
and upon inspection it becomes clear that being able to use a few recent
C++ features (in particular lambdas) would help a great deal. The code
would still be pretty intricate, but it would be a lot easier to reason
about the flow of callbacks through things like
__thread_poll_with_backoff.

As a result, this patch deprecates support for the synchronization
library before C++20. In the next release, we can remove that support
entirely.
2024-04-16 10:57:48 -04:00
Casey Carter
d3cbcc4e89 [libcxx][test] barrier completion functions must be non-throwing
... per N4910 [thread.barrier.class]/5.
2022-06-24 09:06:47 -07:00
Louis Dionne
a7f9895cc1 [runtimes] Rename various libcpp-has-no-XYZ Lit features to just no-XYZ
Since those features are general properties of the environment, it makes
sense to use them from libc++abi too, and so the name libcpp-has-no-xxx
doesn't make sense.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126482
2022-05-27 15:24:45 -04:00
Louis Dionne
31cbe0f240 [libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.

This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
Olivier Giroux
54fa9ecd30 [libc++] Implementation of C++20's P1135R6 for libcxx
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68480
2020-02-24 10:59:35 -05:00