When a test depends on a new debugserver feature/fix, the API test must
be marked @skipIfOutOfTreeDebugserver because the macOS CI bots test
using the latest Xcode release debugserver. But over time all of these
fixes & new features are picked up in the Xcode debugserver and these
skips can be removed.
We may see unexpected test failures from removing all of these 1+ year
old skips, but that's likely a separate reason the test is failing that
is being papered over by this skip.
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
When I added TestAbortExitCode I actually planned this to be a generic test for the
exit code functionality on POSIX systems. However due to all the different test setups we
can have I don't think this worked out. Right now the test had to be made so permissive
that it pretty much can't fail.
Just to summarize, we would need to support the following situations:
1. ToT debugserver (on macOS)
2. lldb-server (on other platforms)
3. Any old debugserver version when using the system debugserver (on macOS)
This patch is removing TestAbortExitCode and adds a ToT debugserver specific test
that checks the patch that motivated the whole exit code testing. There is already
an exit-code test for lldb-server from what I can see and 3) is pretty much untestable
as we don't know anything about the system debugserver.
Reviewed By: kastiglione
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89305
