Any time we see the pattern `assertEqual(value, bool)`, we can replace
that with `assert<bool>(value)`. Likewise for `assertNotEqual`.
Technically this relaxes the test a bit, as we may want to make sure
`value` is either `True` or `False`, and not something that implicitly
converts to a bool. For example, `assertEqual("foo", True)` will fail,
but `assertTrue("foo")` will not. In most cases, this distinction is not
important.
There are two such places that this patch does **not** transform, since
it seems intentional that we want the result to be a bool:
*
5daf2001a1/lldb/test/API/python_api/sbstructureddata/TestStructuredDataAPI.py (L90)
*
5daf2001a1/lldb/test/API/commands/settings/TestSettings.py (L940)
Followup to 9c2468821ec51defd09c246fea4a47886fff8c01. I patched `teyit`
with a `visit_assertEqual` node handler to generate this.
This uses [teyit](https://pypi.org/project/teyit/) to modernize asserts,
as recommended by the [unittest release
notes](https://docs.python.org/3.12/whatsnew/3.12.html#id3).
For example, `assertTrue(a == b)` is replaced with `assertEqual(a, b)`.
This produces better error messages, e.g. `error: unexpectedly found 1
and 2 to be different` instead of `error: False`.
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
This commit adds tests to ensure that queue-specific breakpoints
work as expected, as this feature wasn't being tested before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131605
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
TestQueues is curiously failing for me as my queue for QOS_CLASS_UNSPECIFIED
is named "Utility" and not "User Initiated" or "Default". While debugging, this
I noticed that this test isn't actually using this API right from what I understand. The API documentation
for `dispatch_get_global_queue` specifies for the parameter: "You may specify the value
QOS_CLASS_USER_INTERACTIVE, QOS_CLASS_USER_INITIATED, QOS_CLASS_UTILITY, or QOS_CLASS_BACKGROUND."
QOS_CLASS_UNSPECIFIED isn't listed as one of the supported values. swift-corelibs-libdispatch
even checks for this value and returns a DISPATCH_BAD_INPUT. The
libdispatch shipped on macOS seems to also check for QOS_CLASS_UNSPECIFIED and seems to
instead cause a "client crash", but somehow this doesn't trigger in this test and instead we just
get whatever queue
This patch just removes that part of the test as it appears the code is just incorrect.
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86211
Summary: Moves lldbsuite tests to lldb/test/API.
This is a largely mechanical change, moved with the following steps:
```
rm lldb/test/API/testcases
mkdir -p lldb/test/API/{test_runner/test,tools/lldb-{server,vscode}}
mv lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/test_runner/test lldb/test/API/test_runner
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/* -maxdepth 0 -type d | egrep -v "make|plugins|test_runner|tools"); do mv $d lldb/test/API; done
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-vscode -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 | grep -v ".py"); do mv $d lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-vscode; done
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-server -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 | egrep -v "gdbremote_testcase.py|lldbgdbserverutils.py|socket_packet_pump.py"); do mv $d lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server; done
```
lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/__init__.py and lldb/test/API/lit.cfg.py were also updated with the new directory structure.
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71151
