On darwin, all virtual sections have zerofill type, and having a
.zerofill directive in a non-virtual section is not allowed. Instead of
asserting, show a nicer error.
In order to use the equivalent of .zerofill in a non-virtual section,
the usage of .zero of .space is required.
This patch replaces the assert with an error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48517
llvm-svn: 336127
This simplifies the logic that updates RAW dependencies in the DispatchStage.
There is no advantage in storing that flag in the ReadDescriptor; we should
simply rely on the call to `STI.getReadAdvanceCycles()` to obtain the
ReadAdvance cycles. If there are no read-advance entries, then method
`getReadAdvanceCycles()` quickly returns 0.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 335977
This patch introduces a new class named WriteRef. A WriteRef is used by the
RegisterFile to keep track of register definitions. Internally it wraps a
WriteState, as well as the source index of the defining instruction.
This patch allows the tool to propagate additional information to support future
analysis on data dependencies.
llvm-svn: 335867
Rather than calling std::find in a loop, just sort the vector and remove
duplicate entries at the end of the function.
Also, move the debug print at the end of the function, and query the
MCRegisterInfo to print register names rather than physreg IDs.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 335837
Summary:
This patch removes a few callbacks from Pipeline. It comes at the cost of
registering Listeners with all Stages. Not all stages need listeners or issue
callbacks, this registration is a bit redundant. However, as we build-out the
API, this redundancy can disappear.
The main purpose here is to move callback code from the Pipeline and into the
stages that actually issue those callbacks. This removes the back-pointer to
the Pipeline that was put into a few Stage subclasses.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon
Reviewed By: andreadb, courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48576
llvm-svn: 335748
When promoting instructions from the wait queue to the ready queue, we should
check if an instruction has already reached the IS_READY state before
calling method update().
llvm-svn: 335722
Summary:
This change renames the Backend and BackendPrinter to Pipeline and PipelinePrinter respectively.
Variables and comments have also been updated to reflect this change.
The reason for this rename, is to be slightly more correct about what MCA is modeling. MCA models a Pipeline, which implies some logical sequence of stages.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon
Reviewed By: andreadb, courbet
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48496
llvm-svn: 335496
The DispatchUnit is no longer a dependency of RCU, so this patch removes a
stale include and forward decl. This patch also cleans up some comments.
llvm-svn: 335392
Summary:
Remove explicit stages and introduce a list of stages.
A pipeline should be composed of an arbitrary list of stages, and not any
predefined list of stages in the Backend. The Backend should not know of any
particular stage, rather it should only be concerned that it has a list of
stages, and that those stages will fulfill the contract of what it means to be
a Stage (namely pre/post/execute a given instruction).
For now, we leave the original set of stages defined in the Backend ctor;
however, I imagine these will be moved out at a later time.
This patch makes an adjustment to the semantics of Stage::isReady.
Specifically, what the Backend really needs to know is if a Stage has
unfinished work. With that said, it is more appropriately renamed
Stage::hasWorkToComplete(). This change will clean up the check in
Backend::run(), allowing us to query each stage to see if there is unfinished
work, regardless of what subclass a stage might be. I feel that this change
simplifies the semantics too, but that's a subjective statement.
Given how RetireStage and ExecuteStage handle data in their preExecute(), I've
had to change the order of Retire and Execute in our stage list. Retire must
complete any of its preExecute actions before ExecuteStage's preExecute can
take control. This is mainly because both stages utilize the RCU. In the
meantime, I want to see if I can adjust that or remove that coupling.
Reviewers: andreadb, RKSimon, courbet
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46907
llvm-svn: 335361
This patch teaches llvm-mca how to identify register writes that implicitly zero
the upper portion of a super-register.
On X86-64, a general purpose register is implemented in hardware as a 64-bit
register. Quoting the Intel 64 Software Developer's Manual: "an update to the
lower 32 bits of a 64 bit integer register is architecturally defined to zero
extend the upper 32 bits". Also, a write to an XMM register performed by an AVX
instruction implicitly zeroes the upper 128 bits of the aliasing YMM register.
This patch adds a new method named clearsSuperRegisters to the MCInstrAnalysis
interface to help identify instructions that implicitly clear the upper portion
of a super-register. The rest of the patch teaches llvm-mca how to use that new
method to obtain the information, and update the register dependencies
accordingly.
I compared the kernels from tests clear-super-register-1.s and
clear-super-register-2.s against the output from perf on btver2. Previously
there was a large discrepancy between the estimated IPC and the measured IPC.
Now the differences are mostly in the noise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48225
llvm-svn: 335113
Summary:
While that is indeed a quite interesting summary stat,
there are cases where it does not really add anything
other than consuming extra lines.
Declutters the output of D48190.
Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, craig.topper
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48209
llvm-svn: 334833
Summary: This patch transforms the Scheduler class into the ExecuteStage. Most of the logic remains.
Reviewers: andreadb, RKSimon, courbet
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47246
llvm-svn: 334679
Fixes PR37790.
In some (very rare) cases, the LSUnit (Load/Store unit) was wrongly marking a
load (or store) as "ready to execute" effectively bypassing older memory barrier
instructions.
To reproduce this bug, the memory barrier must be the first instruction in the
input assembly sequence, and it doesn't have to perform any register writes.
llvm-svn: 334633
Not sure why, but it breaks buildbot clang-cmake-armv8-full.
It causes a failure in TEST 'Xray-armhf-linux :: TestCases/Posix/profiling-single-threaded.cc'.
llvm-svn: 334617
This patch fixe the logic in ReadState::cycleEvent(). That method was not
correctly updating field `TotalCycles`.
Added extra code comments in class ReadState to better describe each field.
llvm-svn: 334028
This patch is the last of a sequence of three patches related to LLVM-dev RFC
"MC support for variant scheduling classes".
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123181.html
This fixes PR36672.
The main goal of this patch is to teach llvm-mca how to solve variant scheduling
classes. This patch does that, plus it adds new variant scheduling classes to
the BtVer2 scheduling model to identify so-called zero-idioms (i.e. so-called
dependency breaking instructions that are known to generate zero, and that are
optimized out in hardware at register renaming stage).
Without the BtVer2 change, this patch would not have had any meaningful tests.
This patch is effectively the union of two changes:
1) a change that teaches llvm-mca how to resolve variant scheduling classes.
2) a change to the BtVer2 scheduling model that allows us to special-case
packed XOR zero-idioms (this partially fixes PR36671).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47374
llvm-svn: 333909
This is required if we want to correctly match the behavior of method
SubtargetEmitter::ExpandProcResource() in Tablegen. When computing the set of
"consumed" processor resources and resource cycles, the logic in
ExpandProcResource() doesn't update the number of resource cycles contributed by
a "Super" resource to a group. We need to take this into account when a model
declares a processor resource which is part of a 'processor resource group', and
it is also used as the "Super" of other resources.
llvm-svn: 333892
The lambda functions used by method ResourceManager::mustIssueImmediately() was
incorrectly truncating masks of buffered processor resources to 32-bit quantities.
The invalid mask values were then used to access a map of processor
resource descriptors.
Fixes PR37643.
llvm-svn: 333692
Summary:
This class maintains the same logic as the original RetireControlUnit.
This is just an intermediate patch to make the RCU a Stage. Future patches will remove the dependency on the DispatchStage, and then more properly populate the pre/execute/post Stage interface.
Reviewers: andreadb, RKSimon, courbet
Reviewed By: andreadb, courbet
Subscribers: javed.absar, mgorny, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47244
llvm-svn: 333292
Before printing the block reciprocal throughput, ensure that the floating point
number is always rounded the same way on every target.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 333210
This patch implements the "block reciprocal throughput" computation in the
SummaryView.
The block reciprocal throughput is computed as the MAX of:
- NumMicroOps / DispatchWidth
- Resource Cycles / #Units (for every resource consumed).
The block throughput is bounded from above by the hardware dispatch throughput.
That is because the DispatchWidth is an upper bound on how many opcodes can be part
of a single dispatch group.
The block throughput is also limited by the amount of hardware parallelism. The
number of available resource units affects how the resource pressure is
distributed, and also how many blocks can be delivered every cycle.
llvm-svn: 333095
Summary:
This is an intermediate change, it moves the non-notification logic from
Backend::notifyCycleBegin to runCycle().
Once the scheduler becomes part of the Execution stage
the explicit call to Scheduler::cycleEvent will disappear.
The logic for Dispatch::cycleEvent() can be in
the preExecute phase, which this patch addresses.
Reviewers: andreadb, RKSimon, courbet
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47213
llvm-svn: 333029
Summary:
The logic of dispatch remains the same, but now DispatchUnit is a Stage (DispatchStage).
This change has the benefit of simplifying the backend runCycle() code.
The same logic applies, but it belongs to different components now. This is just a start,
eventually we will need to remove the call to the DispatchStage in Scheduler.cpp, but
that will be a separate patch. This change is mostly a renaming and moving of existing logic.
This change also encouraged me to remove the Subtarget (STI) member from the
Backend class. That member was used to initialize the other members of Backend
and to eventually call DispatchUnit::dispatch(). Now that we have Stages, we
can eliminate this by instantiating the DispatchStage with everything it needs
at the time of construction (e.g., Subtarget). That change allows us to call
DispatchStage::execute(IR) as we expect to call execute() for all other stages.
Once we add the Stage list (D46907) we can more cleanly call preExecute() on
all of the stages, DispatchStage, will probably wrap cycleEvent() in that
case.
Made some formatting and minor cleanups to README.txt. Some of the text
was re-flowed to stay within 80 cols.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon
Reviewed By: andreadb, courbet
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46983
llvm-svn: 332652
Summary: This change will help us turn the DispatchUnit into its own stage.
Reviewers: andreadb, RKSimon, courbet
Reviewed By: andreadb, courbet
Subscribers: mgorny, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46916
llvm-svn: 332493
Revision 332390 introduced a FetchStage class in llvm-mca.
By design, FetchStage owns all the instructions in-flight in the OoO Backend.
Before this change, new instructions were added to a DenseMap indexed by
instruction id. The problem with using a DenseMap is that elements are not
ordered by key. This was causing a massive slow down in method
FetchStage::postExecute(), which searches for instructions retired that can be
deleted.
This patch replaces the DenseMap with a std::map ordered by instruction index.
At the end of every cycle, we search for the first instruction which is not
marked as "retired", and we remove all the previous instructions before it.
This works well because instructions are retired in-order.
Before this patch, a debug build of llvm-mca (on my Ryzen linux machine) took
~8.0 seconds to simulate 3000 iterations of a x86 dot-product (a `vmulps,
vpermilps, vaddps, vpermilps, vaddps` sequence). With this patch, it now takes
~0.8s to run all the 3000 iterations.
llvm-svn: 332461
Summary:
This is just an idea, really two ideas. I expect some push-back,
but I realize that posting a diff is the most comprehensive way to express
these concepts.
This patch introduces a Stage class which represents the
various stages of an instruction pipeline. As a start, I have created a simple
FetchStage that is based on existing logic for how MCA produces
instructions, but now encapsulated in a Stage. The idea should become more concrete
once we introduce additional stages. The idea being, that when a stage completes,
the next stage in the pipeline will be executed. Stages are chained together
as a singly linked list to closely model a real pipeline. For now there is only one stage,
so the stage-to-stage flow of instructions isn't immediately obvious.
Eventually, Stage will also handle event notifications, but that functionality
is not complete, and not destined for this patch. Ideally, an interested party
can register for notifications from a particular stage. Callbacks will be issued to
these listeners at various points in the execution of the stage.
For now, eventing functionality remains similar to what it has been in mca::Backend.
We will be building-up the Stage class as we move on, such as adding debug output.
This patch also removes the unique_ptr<Instruction> return value from
InstrBuilder::createInstruction. An Instruction pointer is still produced,
but now it's up to the caller to decide how that item should be managed post-allocation
(e.g., smart pointer). This allows the Fetch stage to create instructions and
manage the lifetime of those instructions as it wishes, and not have to be bound to any
specific managed pointer type. Other callers of createInstruction might have different
requirements, and thus can manage the pointer to fit their needs. Another idea would be to push the
ownership to the RCU.
Currently, the FetchStage will wrap the Instruction
pointer in a shared_ptr. This allows us to remove the Instruction container in
Backend, which was probably going to disappear, or move, at some point anyways.
Note that I did run these changes through valgrind, to make sure we are not leaking
memory. While the shared_ptr comes with some additional overhead it relieves us
from having to manage a list of generated instructions, and/or make lookup calls
to remove the instructions.
I realize that both the Stage class and the Instruction pointer management
(mentioned directly above) are separate but related ideas, and probably should
land as separate patches; I am happy to do that if either idea is decent.
The main reason these two ideas are together is that
Stage::execute() can mutate an InstRef. For the fetch stage, the InstRef is populated
as the primary action of that stage (execute()). I didn't want to change the Stage interface
to support the idea of generating an instruction. Ideally, instructions are to
be pushed through the pipeline. I didn't want to draw too much of a
specialization just for the fetch stage. Excuse the word-salad.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny, javed.absar, tschuett, gbedwell
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46741
llvm-svn: 332390
