Add new clang-tidy check that finds uses of `std::lock_guard` and suggests
replacing them with C++17's more flexible and safer alternative
`std::scoped_lock`.
Here is a small description of how it works for better understanding of
the code:
Two separate AST matchers are registered:
- The first one matches declarations of `std::lock_guard` that are
single in their scope (only one `std::lock_guard` in `CompoundStmt`).
It's an easy case, we can emit warning right away.
- The second one matches `CompoundStmt`'s that have multiple
`std::lock_guard` declarations, which means that we may have consecutive
declarations of `std::lock_guard` that can be replaced by a single
`std::scoped_lock`. In order to ensure that declarations are
consecutive, we need to loop over `Stmt`'s in `CompoundStmt`. Here is a
small example:
```cpp
{
std::mutex m1, m2;
std::lock(m1, m2);
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m, std::adopt_lock); // first declaration of 'std::lock_guard'
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l2(m, std::adopt_lock); // second declaration of 'std::lock_guard' that can be merged with first using 'scoped_lock'
}
```
This PR closes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/107839.
Run misc-use-internal-linkage check over clang-tidy code.
Also fixed a couple of other clang-tidy warnings.
Apart from issues in header files, all '.cpp' in
`clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy` must be clang-tidy clear now.
- modernize-use-integer-sign-comparison replaces comparisons between
signed and unsigned integers with their safe C++20 ``std::cmp_*``
alternative, if available.
Add a new clang-tidy check that converts absl::StrFormat (and similar
functions) to std::format (and similar functions.)
Split the configuration of FormatStringConverter out to a separate
Configuration class so that we don't risk confusion by passing two
boolean configuration parameters into the constructor. Add
AllowTrailingNewlineRemoval option since we never want to remove
trailing newlines in this check.
Identifies cases where `std::min` or `std::max` is used to find the
minimum or maximum value among more than two items through repeated
calls. The check replaces these calls with a single call to `std::min`
or `std::max` that uses an initializer list. This makes the code
slightly more efficient.
Closes#25340
Finds constants and function calls to math functions that can be
replaced with c++20's mathematical constants from the 'numbers'
header and offers fix-it hints.
Does not match the use of variables with that value, and instead,
offers a replacement at the definition of those variables.
Finds constants and function calls to math functions that can be
replaced with c++20's mathematical constants from the 'numbers'
header and offers fix-it hints.
Does not match the use of variables with that value, and instead,
offers a replacement at the definition of those variables.
Make a modernize version of abseil-string-find-startswith using the
available C++20 `std::string::starts_with` and
`std::string_view::starts_with`. Following up from
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72283.
Add FormatStringConverter utility class that is capable of converting
printf-style format strings into std::print-style format strings along
with recording a set of casts to wrap the arguments as required and
removing now-unnecessary calls to std::string::c_str() and
std::string::data()
Use FormatStringConverter to implement a new clang-tidy check that is
capable of converting calls to printf, fprintf, absl::PrintF,
absl::FPrintF, or any functions configured by an option to calls to
std::print and std::println, or other functions configured by options.
In other words, the check turns:
fprintf(stderr, "The %s is %3d\n", description.c_str(), value);
into:
std::println(stderr, "The {} is {:3}", description, value);
if it can.
std::print and std::println can do almost anything that standard printf
can, but the conversion has some some limitations that are described in
the documentation. If conversion is not possible then the call remains
unchanged.
Depends on D153716
Reviewed By: PiotrZSL
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149280
Add FormatStringConverter utility class that is capable of converting
printf-style format strings into std::print-style format strings along
with recording a set of casts to wrap the arguments as required and
removing now-unnecessary calls to std::string::c_str() and
std::string::data()
Use FormatStringConverter to implement a new clang-tidy check that is
capable of converting calls to printf, fprintf, absl::PrintF,
absl::FPrintF, or any functions configured by an option to calls to
std::print and std::println, or other functions configured by options.
In other words, the check turns:
fprintf(stderr, "The %s is %3d\n", description.c_str(), value);
into:
std::println(stderr, "The {} is {:3}", description, value);
if it can.
std::print and std::println can do almost anything that standard printf
can, but the conversion has some some limitations that are described in
the documentation. If conversion is not possible then the call remains
unchanged.
Depends on D153716
Reviewed By: PiotrZSL
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149280
Add FormatStringConverter utility class that is capable of converting
printf-style format strings into std::print-style format strings along
with recording a set of casts to wrap the arguments as required and
removing now-unnecessary calls to std::string::c_str() and
std::string::data()
Use FormatStringConverter to implement a new clang-tidy check that is
capable of converting calls to printf, fprintf, absl::PrintF,
absl::FPrintF, or any functions configured by an option to calls to
std::print and std::println, or other functions configured by options.
In other words, the check turns:
fprintf(stderr, "The %s is %3d\n", description.c_str(), value);
into:
std::println(stderr, "The {} is {:3}", description, value);
if it can.
std::print and std::println can do almost anything that standard printf
can, but the conversion has some some limitations that are described in
the documentation. If conversion is not possible then the call remains
unchanged.
Depends on D153716
Reviewed By: PiotrZSL
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149280
This check will look for usages of standard library type traits of the form `traits<...>::type` and `traits<...>::value` and convert them into `traits_t<...>` and `traits_v<...>` respectively.
This expands on the work in D135404 by supporting dependent traits with no instantiations as well as types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137302
Most of the options stated there are duplicated already in
the implementation of each check as a default value for
each option.
The only place where this is not the case is the nullptr
check. Move the default option there instead. Only the
HICPP guidelines alias this modernize check, and there is
nothing in the documentation that suggests it should have
a different default value than the main modernize check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143843
[buildbot issues fixed]
This check performs basic analysis of macros and replaces them
with an anonymous unscoped enum. Using an unscoped anonymous enum
ensures that everywhere the macro token was used previously, the
enumerator name may be safely used.
Potential macros for replacement must meet the following constraints:
- Macros must expand only to integral literal tokens. The unary
operators plus, minus and tilde are recognized to allow for positive,
negative and bitwise negated integers.
- Macros must be defined on sequential source file lines, or with
only comment lines in between macro definitions.
- Macros must all be defined in the same source file.
- Macros must not be defined within a conditional compilation block.
- Macros must not be defined adjacent to other preprocessor directives.
- Macros must not be used in preprocessor conditions
Each cluster of macros meeting the above constraints is presumed to
be a set of values suitable for replacement by an anonymous enum.
From there, a developer can give the anonymous enum a name and
continue refactoring to a scoped enum if desired. Comments on the
same line as a macro definition or between subsequent macro definitions
are preserved in the output. No formatting is assumed in the provided
replacements.
The check cppcoreguidelines-macro-to-enum is an alias for this check.
Fixes#27408
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117522
This check performs basic analysis of macros and replaces them
with an anonymous unscoped enum. Using an unscoped anonymous enum
ensures that everywhere the macro token was used previously, the
enumerator name may be safely used.
Potential macros for replacement must meet the following constraints:
- Macros must expand only to integral literal tokens. The unary
operators plus, minus and tilde are recognized to allow for positive,
negative and bitwise negated integers.
- Macros must be defined on sequential source file lines, or with
only comment lines in between macro definitions.
- Macros must all be defined in the same source file.
- Macros must not be defined within a conditional compilation block.
- Macros must not be defined adjacent to other preprocessor directives.
- Macros must not be used in preprocessor conditions
Each cluster of macros meeting the above constraints is presumed to
be a set of values suitable for replacement by an anonymous enum.
From there, a developer can give the anonymous enum a name and
continue refactoring to a scoped enum if desired. Comments on the
same line as a macro definition or between subsequent macro definitions
are preserved in the output. No formatting is assumed in the provided
replacements.
The check cppcoreguidelines-macro-to-enum is an alias for this check.
Fixes#27408
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117522
Summary:
This check finds macro expansions of `DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(Type)` and
replaces them with a deleted copy constructor and a deleted assignment operator.
Before the `delete` keyword was introduced in C++11 it was common practice to
declare a copy constructor and an assignment operator as a private members. This
effectively makes them unusable to the public API of a class.
With the advent of the `delete` keyword in C++11 we can abandon the
`private` access of the copy constructor and the assignment operator and
delete the methods entirely.
Migration example:
```
lang=dif
class Foo {
private:
- DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(Foo);
+ Foo(const Foo &) = delete;
+ const Foo &operator=(const Foo &) = delete;
};
```
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman, njames93
Reviewed By: njames93
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80531
Add the modernize-use-trailing-return check to rewrite function signatures to use trailing return types.
Patch by Bernhard Manfred Gruber.
llvm-svn: 360438
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary: Adds a checker to clang-tidy to warn when a non void const member function, taking only parameters passed by value or const reference could be marked as '[[nodiscard]]'
Patch by MyDeveloperDay.
Reviewers: alexfh, stephenkelly, curdeius, aaron.ballman, hokein, JonasToth
Reviewed By: curdeius, JonasToth
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, lefticus, lebedev.ri, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55433
llvm-svn: 350760
Summary:
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39224 | PR39224 ]]
As discussed, we can't always do the transform automatically due to that array-to-pointer decay of C array.
In order to detect whether we can do said transform, we'd need to be able to see all usages of said array,
which is, i would say, rather impossible if e.g. it is in the header.
Thus right now no fixit exists.
Exceptions: `extern "C"` code.
References:
* [[ https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#es27-use-stdarray-or-stack_array-for-arrays-on-the-stack | CPPCG ES.27: Use std::array or stack_array for arrays on the stack ]]
* [[ https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon1-prefer-using-stl-array-or-vector-instead-of-a-c-array | CPPCG SL.con.1: Prefer using STL array or vector instead of a C array ]]
* HICPP `4.1.1 Ensure that a function argument does not undergo an array-to-pointer conversion`
* MISRA `5-2-12 An identifier with array type passed as a function argument shall not decay to a pointer`
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, JonasToth, alexfh, hokein, xazax.hun
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53771
llvm-svn: 346835
This check warns the uses of the deprecated member types of std::ios_base
and replaces those that have a non-deprecated equivalent.
Patch by andobence!
Reviewd by: alexfh
Revision ID: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51332
llvm-svn: 343848
Summary:
Finds instances of namespaces concatenated using explicit syntax, such as `namespace a { namespace b { [...] }}` and offers fix to glue it to `namespace a::b { [...] }`.
Properly handles `inline` and unnamed namespaces. ~~Also, detects empty blocks in nested namespaces and offers to remove them.~~
Test with common use cases included.
I ran the check against entire llvm repository. Except for expected `nested namespace definitions only available with -std=c++17 or -std=gnu++17` warnings I noticed no issues when the check was performed.
Example:
```
namespace a { namespace b {
void test();
}}
```
can become
```
namespace a::b {
void test();
}
```
Patch by wgml!
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: JonasToth, Eugene.Zelenko, lebedev.ri, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52136
llvm-svn: 343000
Summary:
New checker to replace dynamic exception
specifications
This is an alternative to D18575 which relied on reparsing the decl to
find the location of dynamic exception specifications, but couldn't
deal with preprocessor conditionals correctly without reparsing the
entire file.
This approach uses D20428 to find dynamic exception specification
locations and handles all cases correctly.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: xazax.hun, mgehre, malcolm.parsons, mgorny, JDevlieghere, cfe-commits, Eugene.Zelenko, etienneb
Patch by Don Hinton!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20693
llvm-svn: 304977
This check will find occurrences of ``std::random_shuffle`` and replace it with ``std::shuffle``. In C++17 ``std::random_shuffle`` will no longer be available and thus we need to replace it.
Example of case that it fixes
```
std::vector<int> v;
// First example
std::random_shuffle(vec.begin(), vec.end());
```
Reviewers: hokein, aaron.ballman, alexfh, malcolm.parsons, mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30158
llvm-svn: 301167
Summary:
Replaces explicit calls to the constructor in a return with a braced
initializer list. This way the return type is not needlessly duplicated in the
return type and the return statement.
```
Foo bar() {
Baz baz;
return Foo(baz);
}
// transforms to:
Foo bar() {
Baz baz;
return {baz};
}
```
Reviewers: hokein, Prazek, aaron.ballman, alexfh
Reviewed By: Prazek, aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: malcolm.parsons, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28768
llvm-svn: 295199
Summary:
This patch adds a check that replaces std::bind with a lambda.
Not yet working for member functions.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16962
llvm-svn: 269341
Because modernize-make-shared do almost the same job as
modernize-make-unique, I refactored common code to MakeSmartPtrCheck.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19183
llvm-svn: 268253
