These are still disabled by default, but will work in ObjC code if you
enable the `-import-insertions` flag.
Completion requires ASTSignals to be available; before ASTSignals are
available, we will always use #include. Once they are available, the
behavior varies as follows:
- For source files, use #import if the ObjC language flag is enabled
- For header files:
- If the ObjC language flag is disabled, use #include
- If the header file contains any #imports, use #import
- If the header file references any ObjC decls, use #import
- Otherwise, use #include
IncludeFixer support is similar, but it does not rely upon ASTSignals,
instead it does the above checks excluding the scan for ObjC symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139458
And make use of this from clangd's CodeComplete and IncludeFixer, although currently they are both restricted only to #include symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128677
Clang doesn't offer these fixes I guess for a couple of reasons:
- where to insert includes is a formatting concern, and clang shouldn't
depend on clang-format
- the way clang prints diagnostics, we'd show a bunch of basically irrelevant
context of "this is where we'd want to insert the include"
Maybe it's possible to hack around 1, but 2 is still a concern.
Meanwhile, bolting this onto include-fixer gets the job done.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/355
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/937
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114667
Renaming header guards to match the LLVM convention.
This patch was created by automatically applying the fixes from
clang-tidy.
I've removed the [NFC] tag from the title, as we're adding header guards in some files and thus might trigger behavior changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113896
Summary:
Computing lazily leads to crashes. In particular, computing scopes may
produce diagnostics (from inside template instantiations) and we
currently do it when processing another diagnostic, which leads to
crashes.
Moreover, we remember and access 'Scope*' when computing scopes. This
might lead to invalid memory access if the Scope is deleted by the time
we run the delayed computation. We did not actually construct an example
when this happens, though.
From the VCS and review history, it seems the optimization was
introduced in the initial version without a mention of any performance
benchmarks justifying the performance gains. This led me to a
conclusion that the optimization was premature, so removing it to avoid
crashes seems like the right trade-off at that point.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65796
llvm-svn: 368019
Summary:
Multiple diagnostics can be caused by the same unresolved name or incomplete type,
especially if the code is copy-pasted without #includes. The cache can avoid making
repetitive index requests, and thus reduce latency and allow more diagnostics to be
fixed (we limit the number of index requests for each parse).
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58239
llvm-svn: 354268
Summary:
This adds include-fixer feature into clangd based on D56903. Clangd now captures
diagnostics caused by typos and attach include insertion fixes to potentially
fix the typo.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits, kadircet, arphaman, mgrang, jkorous, MaskRay, javed.absar, ilya-biryukov, mgorny
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57021
llvm-svn: 353380
Summary:
This enables clangd to intercept compiler diagnostics and attach fixes (e.g. by
querying index). This patch adds missing includes for incomplete types e.g.
member access into class with only forward declaration. This would allow adding
missing includes for user-typed symbol names that are missing declarations
(e.g. typos) in the future.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56903
llvm-svn: 352361
