I'm trying to remove unused options from the `Analyses.def` file, then
merge the rest of the useful options into the `AnalyzerOptions.def`.
Then make sure one can set these by an `-analyzer-config XXX=YYY` style
flag.
Then surface the `-analyzer-config` to the `clang` frontend;
After all of this, we can pursue the tablegen approach described
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-tablegen-clang-static-analyzer-engine-options-for-better-documentation/61488
In this patch, I'm proposing flag deprecations.
We should support deprecated analyzer flags for exactly one release. In
this case I'm planning to drop this flag in `clang-16`.
In the clang frontend, now we won't pass this option to the cc1
frontend, rather emit a warning diagnostic reminding the users about
this deprecated flag, which will be turned into error in clang-16.
Unfortunately, I had to remove all the tests referring to this flag,
causing a mass change. I've also added a test for checking this warning.
I've seen that `scan-build` also uses this flag, but I think we should
remove that part only after we turn this into a hard error.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126215
This reverts commit d50d9946d1d7e5f20881f0bc71fbd025040b1c96.
Broke check-clang, see comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D126067
Also revert dependent change "[analyzer] Deprecate the unused 'analyzer-opt-analyze-nested-blocks' cc1 flag"
This reverts commit 07b4a6d0461fe64e10d30029ed3d598e49ca3810.
Also revert "[analyzer] Fix buildbots after introducing a new frontend warning"
This reverts commit 90374df15ddc58d823ca42326a76f58e748f20eb.
(See https://reviews.llvm.org/rG90374df15ddc58d823ca42326a76f58e748f20eb)
I'm trying to remove unused options from the `Analyses.def` file, then
merge the rest of the useful options into the `AnalyzerOptions.def`.
Then make sure one can set these by an `-analyzer-config XXX=YYY` style
flag.
Then surface the `-analyzer-config` to the `clang` frontend;
After all of this, we can pursue the tablegen approach described
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-tablegen-clang-static-analyzer-engine-options-for-better-documentation/61488
In this patch, I'm proposing flag deprecations.
We should support deprecated analyzer flags for exactly one release. In
this case I'm planning to drop this flag in `clang-16`.
In the clang frontend, now we won't pass this option to the cc1
frontend, rather emit a warning diagnostic reminding the users about
this deprecated flag, which will be turned into error in clang-16.
Unfortunately, I had to remove all the tests referring to this flag,
causing a mass change. I've also added a test for checking this warning.
I've seen that `scan-build` also uses this flag, but I think we should
remove that part only after we turn this into a hard error.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126215
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,
void func();
becomes
void func(void);
This is the ninth batch of tests being updated (there are a
significant number of other tests left to be updated).
When searching for stores and creating corresponding notes, the
analyzer is more specific about the target region of the store
as opposed to the stored value. While this description was tweaked
for constant and undefined values, it lacked in the most general
case of symbolic values.
This patch tries to find a memory region, where this value is stored,
to use it as a better alias for the value.
rdar://76645710
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101041
Since we can report memory leaks on one variable, while the originally
allocated object was stored into another one, we should explain
how did it get there.
rdar://76645710
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100852
When reporting leaks, we try to attach the leaking object to some
variable, so it's easier to understand. Before the patch, we always
tried to use the first variable that stored the object in question.
This can get very confusing for the user, if that variable doesn't
contain that object at the moment of the actual leak. In many cases,
the warning is dismissed as false positive and it is effectively a
false positive when we fail to properly explain the warning to the
user.
This patch addresses the bigest issue in cases like this. Now we
check if the variable still contains the leaking symbolic object.
If not, we look for the last variable to actually hold it and use
that variable instead.
rdar://76645710
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100839
Following r363007, which reverted r362998, r362996, and r362994,
reapply with adjustments for the CRLF differences encountered with
Windows. Namely, the `-b` option of `diff` is employed, and the `grep`
patterns have `$` replaced with `[[:space:]]*$`.
llvm-svn: 363069
Reverts r362998, r362996, and r362994 because the tests do not pass on
Windows due to CRLF changes. Adding back `-w` to diff is not enough, the
new grep substitution doesn't work on Windows, and fixing it is
non-trivial.
llvm-svn: 363007
Summary:
The `%diff_plist` lit substitution invokes `diff` with a non-portable
`-I` option. The intended effect can be achieved by normalizing the
inputs to `diff` beforehand. Such normalization can be done with
`grep -Ev`, which is also used by other tests.
This patch applies the change (adjusted for review comments) described
in http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-April/061904.html
mechanically to the cases where the output file is piped to
`%diff_plist` via `cat`.
The changes were applied via a script, except that
`clang/test/Analysis/NewDelete-path-notes.cpp` and
`clang/test/Analysis/plist-macros-with-expansion.cpp` were each adjusted
for the line-continuation on the relevant `RUN` step.
Reviewers: NoQ, sfertile, xingxue, jasonliu, daltenty
Subscribers: xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, Charusso, jsji, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62950
llvm-svn: 362996
The current argument order has "expected" and "actual" the wrong way around,
so that the diff shows the change from expected to actual, not from actual to expected.
Namely, if the expected diagnostics contains the string "foo", but the analyzer emits "bar",
we really want to see:
```
- foo
+ bar
```
not
```
- bar
+ foo
```
since adapting to most changes would require applying that diff to the expected output.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56340
llvm-svn: 350866
If the object is a temporary, and there is no variable it binds to,
let's at least print out the object name in order to help differentiate
it from other temporaries.
rdar://45175098
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55033
llvm-svn: 347943
Modify the RetainCountChecker to perform state "adjustments" in
checkEndFunction, as performing work in PreStmt<ReturnStmt> does not
work with destructors.
The previous version made an implicit assumption that no code runs
after the return statement is executed.
rdar://43945028
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52338
llvm-svn: 342770
This patch defines a new substitution and uses it to reduce
duplication in the Clang Analyzer test cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52036
llvm-svn: 342365
A lot of code in RetainCountChecker deals with GC mode.
Given that GC mode is deprecated, Apple does not ship runtime for it,
and modern compiler toolchain does not support it, it makes sense to
remove the code dealing with it in order to aid understanding of
RetainCountChecker.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50747
llvm-svn: 340091
Some of the analyzer tests check the exact plist output, in order to
verify that the diagnostics produced is correct.
Current testing setup has many issues:
plist output clobbers tests, making them harder to read
it is impossible to debug test failures given error messages from FileCheck.
The only recourse is manually creating the files and using the diff
again, it is impossible to update the tests given the error message:
the only process is a tedious manual one,
going from a separate plist file to CHECK directives.
This patch offers a much better approach of using "diff" directly in place of FileCheck,
and moving tests to separate files.
Generated using the following script:
```
import os
import glob
import re
import subprocess
diagnostics_key = "// CHECK: <key>diagnostics</key>"
def process_file(f, data):
idx = data.index(diagnostics_key)
plist_out_f = 'ExpectedOutputs/plists/%s.plist' % f
plist_out_folder = os.path.join('ExpectedOutputs/plists/', os.path.dirname(f))
plist_data = data[idx:]
plist_data = plist_data.replace('// CHECK: ', '')
plist_data = plist_data.replace('// CHECK-NEXT: ', '')
plist_data += "</dict>\n</plist>\n"
data = data[:idx]
ptn = re.compile("FileCheck --?input-file(=| )(%t|%t\.plist) %s")
if not ptn.findall(data):
print "none found =/ skipping..."
return
data = ptn.sub(lambda m: "tail -n +11 %s | diff -u -w - %%S/../%s" % (m.group(2), plist_out_f), data)
with open(f, 'w') as out_f:
out_f.write(data)
subprocess.check_call(["mkdir", "-p", plist_out_folder])
with open(plist_out_f, 'w') as out_f:
out_f.write(plist_data)
def main():
files = glob.glob("**/*.*")
for f in files:
with open(f) as f_handler:
data = f_handler.read()
if diagnostics_key in data:
print "Converting %s" %f
process_file(f, data)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50545
llvm-svn: 339475
Rename AlternateExtensive to Extensive.
In 2013, five years ago, we have switched to AlternateExtensive
diagnostics by default, and Extensive was available under unused,
undocumented flag.
This change remove the flag, renames the Alternate
diagnostic to Extensive (as it's no longer Alternate), and ports the
test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47670
llvm-svn: 334524
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
The more detailed diagnostic will make identifying which object the
diagnostics refer to easier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27740
llvm-svn: 289883
This patch adds hashes to the plist and html output to be able to identfy bugs
for suppressing false positives or diff results against a baseline. This hash
aims to be resilient for code evolution and is usable to identify bugs in two
different snapshots of the same software. One missing piece however is a
permanent unique identifier of the checker that produces the warning. Once that
issue is resolved, the hashes generated are going to change. Until that point
this feature is marked experimental, but it is suitable for early adoption.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10305
Original patch by: Bence Babati!
llvm-svn: 251011
This is imitating a pre-r228174 state where ivars are not considered tracked by
default, but with the addition that even ivars /with/ retain count information
(e.g. "[_ivar retain]; [ivar _release];") are not being tracked as well. This is
to ensure that we don't regress on values accessed through both properties and
ivars, which is what r228174 was trying to fix.
The issue occurs in code like this:
[_contentView retain];
[_contentView removeFromSuperview];
[self addSubview:_contentView]; // invalidates 'self'
[_contentView release];
In this case, the call to -addSubview: may change the value of self->_contentView,
and so the analyzer can't be sure that we didn't leak the original _contentView.
This is a correct conservative view of the world, but not a useful one. Until we
have a heuristic that allows us to not consider this a leak, not emitting a
diagnostic is our best bet.
This commit disables all of the ivar-related retain count tests, but does not
remove them to ensure that we don't crash trying to evaluate either valid or
erroneous code. The next commit will add a new test for the example above so
that this commit (and the previous one) can be reverted wholesale when a better
solution is implemented.
Rest of rdar://problem/20335433
llvm-svn: 233592
Give up this checking in order to continue tracking that these values came from
direct ivar access, which will be important in the next commit.
Part of rdar://problem/20335433
llvm-svn: 233591
to the plist output. This check_name field does not guaranteed to be the
same as the name of the checker in the future.
Reviewer: Anna Zaks
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6841
llvm-svn: 228624
A refinement of r204730, itself a refinement of r198953, to better handle
cases where an object is accessed both through a property getter and
through direct ivar access. An object accessed through a property should
always be treated as +0, i.e. not owned by the caller. However, an object
accessed through an ivar may be at +0 or at +1, depending on whether the
ivar is a strong reference. Outside of ARC, we don't always have that
information.
The previous attempt would clear out the +0 provided by a getter, but only
if that +0 hadn't already participated in other retain counting operations.
(That is, "self.foo" is okay, but "[[self.foo retain] autorelease]" is
problematic.) This turned out to not be good enough when our synthesized
getters get involved.
This commit drops the notion of "overridable" reference counting and instead
just tracks whether a value ever came from a (strong) ivar. If it has, we
allow one more release than we otherwise would. This has the added benefit
of being able to catch /some/ overreleases of instance variables, though
it's not likely to come up in practice.
We do still get some false negatives because we currently throw away
refcount state upon assigning a value into an ivar. We should probably
improve on that in the future, especially once we synthesize setters as
well as getters.
rdar://problem/18075108
llvm-svn: 228174
This once again restores notes to following their associated warnings
in -analyzer-output=text mode. (This is still only intended for use as a
debugging aid.)
One twist is that the warning locations in "regular" analysis output modes
(plist, multi-file-plist, html, and plist-html) are reported at a different
location on the command line than in the output file, since the command
line has no path context. This commit makes -analyzer-output=text behave
like a normal output format, which means that the *command line output
will be different* in -analyzer-text mode. Again, since -analyzer-text is
a debugging aid and lo-fi stand-in for a regular output mode, this change
makes sense.
Along the way, remove a few pieces of stale code related to the path
diagnostic consumers.
llvm-svn: 188514
...but don't yet migrate over the existing plist tests. Some of these
would be trivial to migrate; others could use a bit of inspection first.
In any case, though, the new edge algorithm seems to have proven itself,
and we'd like more coverage (and more usage) of it going forwards.
llvm-svn: 183165
The uniqueing location is the location which is part of the hash used to determine if two reports are
the same. This is used by the CmpRuns.py script to compare two analyzer runs and determine which
warnings are new.
llvm-svn: 180166
Before:
1. Calling 'foo'
2. Doing something interesting
3. Returning from 'foo'
4. Some kind of error here
After:
1. Calling 'foo'
2. Doing something interesting
3. Returning from 'foo'
4. Some kind of error here
The location of the note is already in the caller, not the callee, so this
just brings the "depth" attribute in line with that.
This only affects plist diagnostic consumers (i.e. Xcode). It's necessary
for Xcode to associate the control flow arrows with the right stack frame.
<rdar://problem/13634363>
llvm-svn: 179351
In this code
int getZero() {
return 0;
}
void test() {
int problem = 1 / getZero(); // expected-warning {{Division by zero}}
}
we generate these arrows:
+-----------------+
| v
int problem = 1 / getZero();
^ |
+---+
where the top one represents the control flow up to the first call, and the
bottom one represents the flow to the division.* It turns out, however, that
we were generating the top arrow twice, as if attempting to "set up context"
after we had already returned from the call. This resulted in poor
highlighting in Xcode.
* Arguably the best location for the division is the '/', but that's a
different problem.
<rdar://problem/13326040>
llvm-svn: 179350
The heuristic here (proposed by Jordan) is that, usually, if a leak is due to an early exit from init, the allocation site will be
a call to alloc. Note that in other cases init resets self to [super init], which becomes the allocation site of the object.
llvm-svn: 179221
