3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Donát Nagy
c3f8dd1228
[NFC][analyzer] Use %clang_analyze_cc1 consistently (#145895)
A large majority of the LIT tests of the clang static analyzer use RUN
lines with the placeholder `%clang_analyze_cc1` which expands to
`%clang_cc1 -analyze -setup-static-analyzer` where the only effect of
`-setup-static-analyzer` is that it ensures that the macro
`__clang_analyzer__` is defined. However, there were some tests that
used `%clang_cc1 -analyze` directly; this commit changes those to using
`%clang_analyze_cc1` for the sake of consistency.

Previously `%clang_analyze_cc1` did not work within the directory
`exploded-graph-rewriter` (because that directory has its own custom
`lit.local.cfg`) but this problem was eliminated by the recent commit
40cc4379cda6e0d6efe72c55d1968f9cf427a16a, so it was possible to resolve
and delete the FIXME comments asking for this change.

There are a few tests that use `%clang --analyze` or other command-line
flags (e.g. help flags), those are not affected by this change.

This cleanup was discussed in the discourse thread
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/taking-ownership-of-clang-test-analysis/84689/11
2025-06-30 12:59:51 +02:00
Artem Dergachev
4fb586c349 [analyzer] Re-enable lifetime extension for temporaries without destructors.
When an object's class provides no destructor, it's less important to
materialize that object properly because we don't have to model the destructor
correctly, so previously we skipped the support for these syntax patterns.

Additionally, fix support for construction contexts of "static temporaries"
(temporaries that are lifetime-extended by static references) because
it turned out that we only had tests for them without destructors, which caused
us to regress when we re-introduced the construction context for such
temporaries.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47658

llvm-svn: 335796
2018-06-28 00:11:42 +00:00
Artem Dergachev
647804a84a [analyzer] When creating a temporary object, properly copy the value into it.
Adjustments should be considered properly; we should copy the unadjusted object
over the whole temporary base region. If the unadjusted object is no longer
available in the Environment, invalidate the temporary base region, and then
copy the adjusted object into the adjusted sub-region of the temporary region.

This fixes a regression introduced by r288263, that caused various
false positives, due to copying only adjusted object into the adjusted region;
the rest of the base region therefore remained undefined.
Before r288263, the adjusted value was copied over the unadjusted region,
which is incorrect, but accidentally worked better due to how region store
disregards compound value bindings to non-base regions.

An additional test machinery is introduced to make sure that despite making
two binds, we only notify checkers once for both of them, without exposing
the partially copied objects.

This fix is a hack over a hack. The proper fix would be to model C++ temporaries
in the CFG, and after that dealing with adjustments would no longer be
necessary, and the values we need would no longer disappear from the
Environment.

rdar://problem/30658168

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30534

llvm-svn: 298924
2017-03-28 15:43:26 +00:00