Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/90154
This patch is also an optimization to the lookup process to utilize the
information provided by `export` keyword.
Previously, in the lookup process, the `export` keyword only takes part
in the check part, it doesn't get involved in the lookup process. That
said, previously, in a name lookup for 'name', we would load all of
declarations with the name 'name' and check if these declarations are
valid or not. It works well. But it is inefficient since it may load
declarations that may not be wanted.
Note that this patch actually did a trick in the lookup process instead
of bring module information to DeclarationName or considering module
information when deciding if two declarations are the same. So it may
not be a surprise to me if there are missing cases. But it is not a
regression. It should be already the case. Issue reports are welcomed.
In this patch, I tried to split the big lookup table into a lookup table
as before and a module local lookup table, which takes a combination of
the ID of the DeclContext and hash value of the primary module name as
the key. And refactored `DeclContext::lookup()` method to take the
module information. So that a lookup in a DeclContext won't load
declarations that are local to **other** modules.
And also I think it is already beneficial to split the big lookup table
since it may reduce the conflicts during lookups in the hash table.
BTW, this patch introduced a **regression** for a reachability rule in
C++20 but it was false-negative. See
'clang/test/CXX/module/module.interface/p7.cpp' for details.
This patch is not expected to introduce any other
regressions for non-c++20-modules users since the module local lookup
table should be empty for them.
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/90154
This patch is also an optimization to the lookup process to utilize the
information provided by `export` keyword.
Previously, in the lookup process, the `export` keyword only takes part
in the check part, it doesn't get involved in the lookup process. That
said, previously, in a name lookup for 'name', we would load all of
declarations with the name 'name' and check if these declarations are
valid or not. It works well. But it is inefficient since it may load
declarations that may not be wanted.
Note that this patch actually did a trick in the lookup process instead
of bring module information to DeclarationName or considering module
information when deciding if two declarations are the same. So it may
not be a surprise to me if there are missing cases. But it is not a
regression. It should be already the case. Issue reports are welcomed.
In this patch, I tried to split the big lookup table into a lookup table
as before and a module local lookup table, which takes a combination of
the ID of the DeclContext and hash value of the primary module name as
the key. And refactored `DeclContext::lookup()` method to take the
module information. So that a lookup in a DeclContext won't load
declarations that are local to **other** modules.
And also I think it is already beneficial to split the big lookup table
since it may reduce the conflicts during lookups in the hash table.
BTW, this patch introduced a **regression** for a reachability rule in
C++20 but it was false-negative. See
'clang/test/CXX/module/module.interface/p7.cpp' for details.
This patch is not expected to introduce any other
regressions for non-c++20-modules users since the module local lookup
table should be empty for them.
---
On the API side, this patch unfortunately add a maybe-confusing argument
`Module *NamedModule` to
`ExternalASTSource::FindExternalVisibleDeclsByName()`. People may think
we can get the information from the first argument `const DeclContext
*DC`. But sadly there are declarations (e.g., namespace) can appear in
multiple different modules as a single declaration. So we have to add
additional information to indicate this.
Recently, there are multiple false positive issue reports about the
reachability of implementation partition units:
- https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/105882
- https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/101348
- https://lists.isocpp.org/core/2024/08/16232.php
And according to our use experience for modules, we find it is a pretty
good practice to not import implementation partition units in the
interface units. It can help developers to have a pretty good mental
model for when to use an implementation partition unit: that any unit in
the module but not in the module interfaces can be in the implementation
partition unit.
So I think it is good to add the diagnostics.
Summary:
There is no sense to report these cases as an error or add `inline`
explicitly in these cases, if it is not required in normal headers.
Similar to #60079.
Test Plan: check-clang
Due to an oversight, when users use an unexported declaration from
implicit global module, the diagnostic will show "please #include"
instead of "please import". This patch corrects the behavior.
Also previously, when users use an unexported declarations from module
partitions, the diagnostic message will always show the partition name
no matter if that partition name is visible to the users. Now the users
may only see the partition name if the users are in the same module with
the partition unit.
The following test fails to compile TU b.cpp because we are not making the transitively imported modules visible (per [module.import]/p7)
```
a.cppm:
export module a;
export int foo() {
return 42;
}
b.cppm:
export module b;
import a;
export int bar();
b.cpp:
module b;
int bar() {
return foo();
}
clang++ -c -std=c++2b -fmodule-output a.cppm
clang++ -c -std=c++2b -fmodule-output -fprebuilt-module-path=. b.cppm
clang++ -c -std=c++2b -fprebuilt-module-path=. b.cpp
b.cpp:4:12: error: declaration of 'foo' must be imported from module 'a' before it is required
return foo();
```
This is fixed by the following patch (which also addresses a FIXME in basic.def.odr/p6.cppm).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152746
Address part of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/60079.
Deleted and Defaulted functions are implicitly inline, but that state
is not set at the point that we perform the diagnostic checks for externally-
visible non-inline functions; check the function body type explicitly in the
diagnostic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141908
definitions in header units
Address part of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/60079.
Since the the declaration of a non-inline static data member in its
class definition is not a definition. The following form:
```
class A {
public:
static const int value = 43;
};
```
should be fine to appear in a header unit. From the perspective of
implementation, it looks like we simply forgot to check if the variable
is a definition...
Reviewed By: iains
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141905
[module.import/6] last sentence:
A header unit shall not contain a definition of a non-inline function or
variable whose name has external linkage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140261
Now the implementation would accept following code:
```
//--- impl.cppm
module M:impl;
class A {};
//--- M.cppm
export module M;
import :impl;
//--- Use.cpp
import M;
void test() {
A a; // Expected error. A is not visible here.
}
```
which is clearly wrong. The root cause is the implementation of
`isInCurrentModule` would return true if the module is a partition! So
in the above example, although Use.cpp is not a module unit,
`isInCurrentModule ` would still return true when the compiler tries to
see if the owning module of `A` is the current module. I believe this is
an oversight. This patch tries to fix this problem.
Reviewed By: iains
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123837
