The exit code for -### is inconsistent. Unrecognized options lead to
exit code 1, as expected. However, most others errors (including invalid
option value) lead to exit code 0, differing from GCC and most utilities.
This is a longstanding quirk of -###, and we didn't fix it because many
driver tests need adjustment.
Change -### to be similar to -fdriver-only -v and exit with code 1.
This requires fixing many driver tests, but the end result gives us
stronger tests.
* Existing `RUN: %clang -### ...` tests usually don't use `CHECK-NOT: error:` or `--implicit-check-not=error:`.
If a change introduces an error, such a change usually cannot be detected.
* Many folks contributing new tests don't know `-fdriver-only -v`.
To test no driver error/warning for new tests, they can use the familiar `-### -Werror`
instead of `-fdriver-only -v -Werror`.
An incomplete list of prerequisite test improvement:
* 2f79bb10461d114783a1548201928549ace09755: add -nogpulib to some AMDGPU tests
* 9155e517e6e1cda474d0d0fa82f71696c325bc10: add --cuda-path= (test w/ and w/o /usr/local/cuda)
* 80765ede5bbcca1364c2d4ae06127011eaba6389: -mcpu=native may return either 0 or 1, depending on whether `--target=` specifies a native target
* abae53f43f0d1da8d8e421f4a628d7ec64d6e365: fix -fuse-ld=lld misuses (test w/o and w/o /usr/local/bin/ld.lld)
* ab68df505e5bb8808ee44f53044b50ca7575098e: add -resource-dir= and -fvisibility=hidden
to some -fsanitize=cfi tests
* d5ca1602f64114f612ad5630f04e4aa90591c78d: --rtlib=platform without --unwindlib= may fail if CLANG_DEFAULT_UNWINDLIB=unwindlib
Reviewed By: jhuber6, yaxunl, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156363
The exit code for -### is inconsistent. Unrecognized options lead to
exit code 1, as expected. However, most others errors (including invalid
option value) lead to exit code 0, differing from GCC and most utilities.
This is a longstanding quirk of -###, and we didn't fix it because many
driver tests need adjustment.
Change -### to be similar to -fdriver-only -v and exit with code 1.
This requires fixing many driver tests, but the end result gives us
stronger tests.
* Existing `RUN: %clang -### ...` tests usually don't use `CHECK-NOT: error:` or `--implicit-check-not=error:`.
If a change introduces an error, such a change usually cannot be detected.
* Many folks contributing new tests don't know `-fdriver-only -v`.
To test no driver error/warning for new tests, they can use the familiar `-### -Werror`
instead of `-fdriver-only -v -Werror`.
An incomplete list of prerequisite test improvement:
* 2f79bb10461d114783a1548201928549ace09755: add -nogpulib to some AMDGPU tests
* 9155e517e6e1cda474d0d0fa82f71696c325bc10: add --cuda-path= (test w/ and w/o /usr/local/cuda)
* 80765ede5bbcca1364c2d4ae06127011eaba6389: -mcpu=native may return either 0 or 1, depending on whether `--target=` specifies a native target
* abae53f43f0d1da8d8e421f4a628d7ec64d6e365: fix -fuse-ld=lld misuses (test w/o and w/o /usr/local/bin/ld.lld)
Reviewed By: jhuber6, yaxunl, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156363
This reverts commit e39bf32b3bc2f0cc21d783ba789bd82553493875.
Some tests have different behaviors depent on whether certain directories/files are present on the host.
An incomplete list from https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/109/builds/70149
csky-toolchain.c
riscv*-toolchain.c
fuchsia.*
hip-*
ohos.c
The exit code for -### is inconsistent. Unrecognized options lead to
exit code 1, as expected. However, most others errors (including invalid
option value) lead to exit code 0, differing from GCC and most utilities.
This is a longstanding quirk of -###, and we didn't fix it because many
driver tests need adjustment.
Change -### to be similar to -fdriver-only -v and exit with code 1.
This requires fixing many driver tests, but the end result gives us
stronger tests.
* Existing `RUN: %clang -### ...` tests usually don't use `CHECK-NOT: error:` or `--implicit-check-not=error:`.
If a change introduces an error, such a change usually cannot be detected.
* Many folks contributing new tests don't know `-fdriver-only -v`.
To test no driver error/warning for new tests, they can use the familiar `-### -Werror`
instead of `-fdriver-only -v -Werror`.
Reviewed By: jhuber6, yaxunl, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156363
The original warning added in D115501 when pacbti is used with an
incompatible architecture was not exactly correct because it was
not really ignored and can affect codegen.
Therefore reword to say that the pacbti option is incompatible with
the given architecture.
Reviewed By: chill
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119166
Branch protection in M-class is supported by
- Armv8.1-M.Main
- Armv8-M.Main
- Armv7-M
Attempting to enable this for other architectures, either by
command-line (e.g -mbranch-protection=bti) or by target attribute
in source code (e.g. __attribute__((target("branch-protection=..."))) )
will generate a warning.
In both cases function attributes related to branch protection will not
be emitted. Regardless of the warning, module level attributes related to
branch protection will be emitted when it is enabled via the command-line.
The following people also contributed to this patch:
- Victor Campos
Reviewed By: chill
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115501
Handle branch protection option on the commandline as well as a function
attribute. One patch for both mechanisms, as they use the same underlying
parsing mechanism.
These are recorded in a set of LLVM IR module-level attributes like we do for
AArch64 PAC/BTI (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D85649):
- command-line options are "translated" to module-level LLVM IR
attributes (metadata).
- functions have PAC/BTI specific attributes iff the
__attribute__((target("branch-protection=...))) was used in the function
declaration.
- command-line option -mbranch-protection to armclang targeting Arm,
following this grammar:
branch-protection ::= "-mbranch-protection=" <protection>
protection ::= "none" | "standard" | "bti" [ "+" <pac-ret-clause> ]
| <pac-ret-clause> [ "+" "bti"]
pac-ret-clause ::= "pac-ret" [ "+" <pac-ret-option> ]
pac-ret-option ::= "leaf" ["+" "b-key"] | "b-key" ["+" "leaf"]
b-key is simply a placeholder to make it consistent with AArch64's
version. In Arm, however, it triggers a warning informing that b-key is
unsupported and a-key will be selected instead.
- Handle _attribute_((target(("branch-protection=..."))) for AArch32 with the
same grammer as the commandline options.
This patch is part of a series that adds support for the PACBTI-M extension of
the Armv8.1-M architecture, as detailed here:
https://community.arm.com/arm-community-blogs/b/architectures-and-processors-blog/posts/armv8-1-m-pointer-authentication-and-branch-target-identification-extension
The PACBTI-M specification can be found in the Armv8-M Architecture Reference
Manual:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0553/latest
The following people contributed to this patch:
- Momchil Velikov
- Victor Campos
- Ties Stuij
Reviewed By: vhscampos
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112421
