Follow-up to #81037.
ToolChain::LibraryPaths holds the new compiler-rt library directory
(e.g. `/tmp/Debug/lib/clang/19/lib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`). However,
it might be empty when the directory does not exist (due to the `if
(getVFS().exists(P))` change in https://reviews.llvm.org/D158475).
If neither the old/new compiler-rt library directories exists, we would
suggest the undesired old compiler-rt file name:
```
% /tmp/Debug/bin/clang++ a.cc -fsanitize=memory -o a
ld.lld: error: cannot open /tmp/Debug/lib/clang/19/lib/linux/libclang_rt.msan-x86_64.a: No such file or directory
clang++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
```
With this change, we will correctly suggest the new compiler-rt file name.
Fix#87150
Pull Request: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87866
This reverts commit ccdebbae4d77d3efc236af92c22941de5d437e01.
Causes test failures in the presence of Android runtime libraries in resource-dir.
See comments on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87866.
Follow-up to #81037.
ToolChain::LibraryPaths holds the new compiler-rt library directory
(e.g. `/tmp/Debug/lib/clang/19/lib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`). However,
it might be empty when the directory does not exist (due to the `if
(getVFS().exists(P))` change in https://reviews.llvm.org/D158475).
If neither the old/new compiler-rt library directories exists, we would
suggest the undesired old compiler-rt file name:
```
% /tmp/Debug/bin/clang++ a.cc -fsanitize=memory -o a
ld.lld: error: cannot open /tmp/Debug/lib/clang/19/lib/linux/libclang_rt.msan-x86_64.a: No such file or directory
clang++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
```
With this change, we will correctly suggest the new compiler-rt file name.
Fix#87150
Pull Request: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87866
BSD, Linux, and z/OS enable `LLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR` by
default.
When a compiler-rt library is not found, we currently report an
incorrect filename `libclang_rt.XXX-$arch.a`
```
% /tmp/Debug/bin/clang++ a.cc -fsanitize=address -o a
ld.lld: error: cannot open /tmp/Debug/lib/clang/19/lib/linux/libclang_rt.asan-x86_64.a: No such file or directory
clang++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
```
With this change, we will correctly report:
```
% /tmp/Debug/bin/clang++ a.cc -fsanitize=address -o a
ld.lld: error: cannot open /tmp/Debug/lib/clang/19/lib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libclang_rt.asan.a: No such file or directory
clang++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
```
Link: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/runtime-directory-fallback/76860
When targeting a MSVC triple, --dependant-libs with the name of the clang runtime library for profiling is added to the command line args. In it's current implementations clang_rt.profile-<ARCH> is chosen as the name. When building a distribution using LLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR this fails, due to the runtime file names not having an architecture suffix in the filename.
This patch refactors getCompilerRT and getCompilerRTBasename to always consider per-target runtime directories. getCompilerRTBasename now simply returns the filename component of the path found by getCompilerRT
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96638
This is needed so lld-link can find clang_rt.profile when self hosting
on Windows with PGO. Using clang-cl as a linker knows to add the library
but self hosting, using -DCMAKE_LINKER=<...>/lld-link.exe doesn't.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61742
llvm-svn: 360674
Force -fuse-ld=ld, as some other tests in the same file do.
Loosen the regex matching the linker tool name as well, as this
can end up being <triple>-ld in case such a named tool exists.
llvm-svn: 353946
Profiling still doesn't seem to work properly, but this at least
hooks up the library and eases completing whatever is missing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58107
llvm-svn: 353917
I originally requested this to be tested in D25263 but in the end
forgot to make sure that it was done.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28289
llvm-svn: 291389
Summary: This change enables clang to automatically link binaries built with the -fprofile-instr-generate against the clang_rt.profile-i386.lib library.
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15833
llvm-svn: 256855
When adding profiling instrumentation, use libclang_rt.profile_tvos.a
for TVOS targets and libclang_rt.profile_watchos.a for WatchOS targets.
I've also fixed up a comment and added an assert() that prevents us from
defaulting to an incorrect platform.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14521
Reviewed-by: t.p.northover
llvm-svn: 252558
The MachO toolchain has an isTargetIOSBased method, but it isn't
virtual so it isn't very meaningful to call it. After thinking about
this, I guess that putting this logic in the MachO class is a bit of a
layering violation anyway. Do this more like how we handle
AddLinkRuntimeLibArgs instead.
llvm-svn: 237095
Compiler-rt's Profiling library isn't part of the stdlib, so -nostdlib
shouldn't prevent it from being linked. This makes Darwin behave like
other toolchains, and link in the profile runtime irrespective of
-nostdlib, since the resulting program can't be run unless you link
this.
I've also added a test to show that other toolchains already behave
like this.
llvm-svn: 237074
This change removes libclang_rt.profile-pic-<arch>.a version of
profile runtime. Instead, it's sufficient to always build
libclang_rt.profile-<arch>.a with -fPIC, as it can be linked into
both executables and shared objects.
llvm-svn: 221952
If `-shared` is specified, pull in a PIC-version of the profile runtime,
which was added to compiler-rt in r208947. I'm hoping this will get the
bots on my side.
llvm-svn: 208948
