This tries to fix all of the places where a diagnostic message starts
with a capital letter (other than acroynyms or proper nouns) or ends
with punctuation (other than a question mark).
This is in support of a planned change to tablegen to start diagnosing
incorrect diagnostic message styles.
Since Knight Landing and Knight Mill microarchitectures are EOL, we
would like to remove intrinsic supports for its specific ISA in LLVM 19.
In LLVM 18, we will first emit a warning for the usage.
This patch enables the following
1) AMD family 17h "znver2" tune flag (-march, -mcpu).
2) ISAs that are enabled for "znver2" architecture.
3) For the time being, it uses the znver1 scheduler model.
4) Tests are updated.
5) This patch is the clang counterpart to D58343
Reviewers: craig.topper
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58344
llvm-svn: 354899
Summary:
This patch enables the following
1. AMD family 17h architecture using "znver1" tune flag (-march, -mcpu).
2. ISAs that are enabled for "znver1" architecture.
3. Checks ADX isa from cpuid to identify "znver1" flag when -march=native is used.
4. ISAs FMA4, XOP are disabled as they are dropped from amdfam17.
5. For the time being, it uses the btver2 scheduler model.
6. Test file is updated to check this flag.
This is linked to llvm review item https://reviews.llvm.org/D28017
Patch by Ganesh Gopalasubramanian. Additional test cases added by Craig Topper.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, RKSimon, ashutosh.nema, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28018
llvm-svn: 291544
basic microarchitecture names, and add support (with tests) for parsing
all of the masic microarchitecture names for CPUs documented to be
accepted by GCC with -march. I didn't go back through the 32-bit-only
old microarchitectures, but this at least brings the recent architecture
names up to speed. This is essentially the follow-up to the LLVM commit
r223769 which did similar cleanups for the LLVM CPUs.
One particular benefit is that you can now use -march=westmere in Clang
and get the LLVM westmere processor which is a different ISA variant (!)
and so quite significant.
Much like with r223769, I would appreciate the Intel folks carefully
thinking about the macros defined, names used, etc for the atom chips
and newest primary x86 chips. The current patterns seem quite strange to
me, especially here in Clang.
Note that I haven't replicated the per-microarchitecture macro defines
provided by GCC. I'm really opposed to source code using these rather
than using ISA feature macros.
llvm-svn: 223776
