Given the following invalid code,
```cpp
template <class T>
struct S {
T *a;
};
S s = {1};
```
we produce such diagnostics currently:
```
<source>:2:8: note: candidate template ignored: could not match 'S<T>' against 'int'
2 | struct S {
| ^
<source>:2:8: note: candidate template ignored: could not match 'T *' against 'int'
```
Which I think is confusing because there's no `S<T>` nor `T *` at the
location it points to. This is because we're deducing the initializer
against implicitly generated deduction guides, and their source
locations just point to the corresponding `RecordDecl`. Hence the
misleading notes.
This patch alleviates the issue by adding extra notes demonstrating
which implicit deduction guide we're deducing against. In other words,
in addition to the note of `could not match 'T *' against 'int'`, we
would also say the implicit deduction guide we're trying to use:
`template <class T> S(T *) -> S<T>`, which looks clearer IMO.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sirraide <aeternalmail@gmail.com>
The compiler would crash if we lookup for name in transparent decl
context. See the tests attached for example.
I think this should make sense since the member declared in transparent
DeclContext are semantically defined in the enclosing (non-transparent)
DeclContext, this is the definition for transparent DeclContext.
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116792
