Add initial parsing/sema support for new assumption clause so clause can
be specified. For now, it's ignored, just like the others.
Added support for 'no_openmp_construct' to release notes.
Testing
- Updated appropriate LIT tests.
- Testing: check-all
This is a followup to #81014 and #84582: Before this patch, Clang
would accept `__attribute__((assume))` and `[[clang::assume]]` as
nonstandard spellings for the `[[omp::assume]]` attribute; this
resulted in a potentially very confusing name clash with C++23’s
`[[assume]]` attribute (and GCC’s `assume` attribute with the same
semantics).
This pr replaces every usage of `__attribute__((assume))` with
`[[omp::assume]]` and makes `__attribute__((assume))` and
`[[clang::assume]]` alternative spellings for C++23’s `[[assume]]`;
this shouldn’t cause any problems due to differences in appertainment
and because almost no-one was using this variant spelling to begin
with (a use in libclc has already been changed to use a different
attribute).
Original commit message:
"
Commit https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/46f3ade introduced a notion
of printing the attributes on the left to improve the printing of attributes
attached to variable declarations. The intent was to produce more GCC compatible
code because clang tends to print the attributes on the right hand side which is
not accepted by gcc.
This approach has increased the complexity in tablegen and the attrubutes
themselves as now the are supposed to know where they could appear. That lead to
mishandling of the `override` keyword which is modelled as an attribute in
clang.
This patch takes an inspiration from the existing approach and tries to keep the
position of the attributes as they were written. To do so we use simpler
heuristic which checks if the source locations of the attribute precedes the
declaration. If so, it is considered to be printed before the declaration.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/87151
"
The reason for the bot breakage is that attributes coming from ApiNotes are not
marked implicit even though they do not have source locations. This caused an
assert to trigger. This patch forces attributes with no source location
information to be printed on the left. That change is consistent to the overall
intent of the change to increase the chances for attributes to compile across
toolchains and at the same time the produced code to be as close as possible to
the one written by the user.
Commit https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/46f3ade introduced a
notion of printing the attributes on the left to improve the printing of
attributes attached to variable declarations. The intent was to produce
more GCC compatible code because clang tends to print the attributes on
the right hand side which is not accepted by gcc.
This approach has increased the complexity in tablegen and the
attrubutes themselves as now the are supposed to know where they could
appear. That lead to mishandling of the `override` keyword which is
modelled as an attribute in clang.
This patch takes an inspiration from the existing approach and tries to
keep the position of the attributes as they were written. To do so we
use simpler heuristic which checks if the source locations of the
attribute precedes the declaration. If so, it is considered to be
printed before the declaration.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/87151
Emission of `mustprogress` attribute previously occurred only within
`EmitFunctionBody`, after generating the function body. Other routines
for function body creation may lack the attribute, potentially leading
to suboptimal optimizations later in the pipeline. Attribute emission
is now anticipated prior to generating the function body.
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/69833.
Previously clang AST prints the following declaration:
int fun_var_unused() {
int x __attribute__((unused)) = 0;
return x;
}
and
int __declspec(thread) x = 0;
as:
int fun_var_unused() {
int x = 0 __attribute__((unused));
return x;
}
and
int x = __declspec(thread) 0;
which is rejected by C/C++ parser. This patch modifies the logic to
print old C attributes for variables as:
int __attribute__((unused)) x = 0;
and the __declspec case as:
int __declspec(thread) x = 0;
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59973
Previous version: D141714.
Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D141714
This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.
The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115
This patch removes the assumption propagation that was added in D110655
primarily to get assumption informatino on opaque call sites for
optimizations. The analysis done in D111445 allows us to do this more
intelligently in the back-end.
Depends on D111445
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111463
This patch adds OpenMP assumption attributes to call sites in applicable
regions. Currently this applies the caller's assumption attributes to
any calls contained within it. So, if a call occurs inside an OpenMP
assumes region to a function outside that region, we will assume that
call respects the assumptions. This is primarily useful for inline
assembly calls used heavily in the OpenMP GPU device runtime, which
allows us to then make judgements about what the ASM will do.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110655
Since these assumptions are coming from OpenMP it makes sense to mark
them as such in the generic IR encoding. Standardized assumptions will
be named
omp_ASSUMPTION_NAME
and extensions will be named
ompx_ASSUMPTION_NAME
which is the OpenMP 5.2 syntax for "extensions" of any kind.
This also matches what the OpenMP-Opt pass expects.
Summarized,
#pragma omp [...] assume[s] no_parallelism
now generates the same IR assumption annotation as
__attribute__((assume("omp_no_parallelism")))
Reviewed By: jhuber6
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105937
The `assumes` directive is an OpenMP 5.1 feature that allows the user to
provide assumptions to the optimizer. Assumptions can refer to
directives (`absent` and `contains` clauses), expressions (`holds`
clause), or generic properties (`no_openmp_routines`, `ext_ABCD`, ...).
The `assumes` spelling is used for assumptions in the global scope while
`assume` is used for executable contexts with an associated structured
block.
This patch only implements the global spellings. While clauses with
arguments are "accepted" by the parser, they will simply be ignored for
now. The implementation lowers the assumptions directly to the
`AssumptionAttr`.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91980
There is a build error with gcc-5 [0], investigating now.
[0] https://reviews.llvm.org/D91980#2456526
This reverts commit a5a14cbe7f87e01882ecaa14df5d596cbf38823a.
The `assumes` directive is an OpenMP 5.1 feature that allows the user to
provide assumptions to the optimizer. Assumptions can refer to
directives (`absent` and `contains` clauses), expressions (`holds`
clause), or generic properties (`no_openmp_routines`, `ext_ABCD`, ...).
The `assumes` spelling is used for assumptions in the global scope while
`assume` is used for executable contexts with an associated structured
block.
This patch only implements the global spellings. While clauses with
arguments are "accepted" by the parser, they will simply be ignored for
now. The implementation lowers the assumptions directly to the
`AssumptionAttr`.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91980
