16 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nikita Popov
07f3388fff Revert "[clang] Implement instantiation context note for checking template parameters (#126088)"
This reverts commit a24523ac8dc07f3478311a5969184b922b520395.

This is causing significant compile-time regressions for C++ code, see:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126088#issuecomment-2704874202
2025-03-10 10:32:08 +01:00
Matheus Izvekov
a24523ac8d
[clang] Implement instantiation context note for checking template parameters (#126088)
Instead of manually adding a note pointing to the relevant template
parameter to every relevant error, which is very easy to miss, this
patch adds a new instantiation context note, so that this can work using
RAII magic.

This fixes a bunch of places where these notes were missing, and is more
future-proof.

Some diagnostics are reworked to make better use of this note:
- Errors about missing template arguments now refer to the parameter
which is missing an argument.
- Template Template parameter mismatches now refer to template
parameters as parameters instead of arguments.

It's likely this will add the note to some diagnostics where the
parameter is not super relevant, but this can be reworked with time and
the decrease in maintenance burden makes up for it.

This bypasses the templight dumper for the new context entry, as the
tests are very hard to update.

This depends on #125453, which is needed to avoid losing the context
note for errors occuring during template argument deduction.
2025-03-06 14:58:42 -03:00
Aaron Ballman
0f1c1be196 [clang] Remove rdar links; NFC
We have a new policy in place making links to private resources
something we try to avoid in source and test files. Normally, we'd
organically switch to the new policy rather than make a sweeping change
across a project. However, Clang is in a somewhat special circumstance
currently: recently, I've had several new contributors run into rdar
links around test code which their patch was changing the behavior of.
This turns out to be a surprisingly bad experience, especially for
newer folks, for a handful of reasons: not understanding what the link
is and feeling intimidated by it, wondering whether their changes are
actually breaking something important to a downstream in some way,
having to hunt down strangers not involved with the patch to impose on
them for help, accidental pressure from asking for potentially private
IP to be made public, etc. Because folks run into these links entirely
by chance (through fixing bugs or working on new features), there's not
really a set of problematic links to focus on -- all of the links have
basically the same potential for causing these problems. As a result,
this is an omnibus patch to remove all such links.

This was not a mechanical change; it was done by manually searching for
rdar, radar, radr, and other variants to find all the various
problematic links. From there, I tried to retain or reword the
surrounding comments so that we would lose as little context as
possible. However, because most links were just a plain link with no
supporting context, the majority of the changes are simple removals.

Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158071
2023-08-28 12:13:42 -04:00
Mehdi Amini
e0ac46e69d Revert "Remove rdar links; NFC"
This reverts commit d618f1c3b12effd0c2bdb7d02108d3551f389d3d.
This commit wasn't reviewed ahead of time and significant concerns were
raised immediately after it landed. According to our developer policy
this warrants immediate revert of the commit.

https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#patch-reversion-policy

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155509
2023-07-17 18:08:04 -07:00
Aaron Ballman
d618f1c3b1 Remove rdar links; NFC
This removes links to rdar, which is an internal bug tracker that the
community doesn't have visibility into.

See further discussion at:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/code-review-reminder-about-links-in-code-commit-messages/71847
2023-07-07 08:41:11 -04:00
Erich Keane
9dd2af0b4c Fix CRTP partial specialization instantiation crash.
Fixes #60778.

When instantiating the body of a class template specialization that was
instantiated from a partial specialization, we were incorrectly
collecting template arguments from the primary template, which resulted
in the template arguments list being inaccurate.  In the example from
the issue, we were trying to substitute the boolean 'false' into the
type on Nested, which caused an assertion.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150285
2023-05-11 06:11:43 -07:00
Richard Smith
6bbfa0fd40 When performing template argument deduction to select a partial
specialization while substituting a partial template parameter pack,
don't try to extend the existing deduction.

This caused us to select the wrong partial specialization in some rare
cases. A recent change to libc++ caused this to happen in practice for
code using std::conjunction.
2021-05-05 14:47:18 -07:00
Richard Smith
fbb83f18b5 PR24076, PR33655, C++ CWG 1558: Consider the instantiation-dependence of
the nested-name-specifier when determining whether a qualified type is
instantiation-dependent.

Previously reverted in 25a02c3d1a688d3cd18faef96c75fa553efbbac7 due to
causing us to reject some code. It turns out that the rejected code was
ill-formed (no diagnostic required).
2021-01-18 21:05:01 -08:00
Adrian Kuegel
25a02c3d1a Revert "PR24076, PR33655, C++ CWG 1558: Consider the instantiation-dependence of"
This reverts commit d3bf0bb18952d830fe6df6f791a64552b271000b.
This causes compilation in certain cases to fail.
Reproducer TBD.
2020-12-23 12:31:52 +01:00
Richard Smith
d3bf0bb189 PR24076, PR33655, C++ CWG 1558: Consider the instantiation-dependence of
the nested-name-specifier when determining whether a qualified type is
instantiation-dependent.
2020-12-17 21:31:23 -08:00
Volodymyr Sapsai
9b973483ed [Sema] Fix assertion when constructor is disabled with partially specialized template.
The added test case was triggering assertion

> Assertion failed: (!SpecializedTemplate.is<SpecializedPartialSpecialization*>() && "Already set to a class template partial specialization!"), function setInstantiationOf, file clang/include/clang/AST/DeclTemplate.h, line 1825.

It was happening with ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl
`enable_if_not_same<int, int>`. Because this template is specialized for
equal types not to have a definition, it wasn't instantiated and its
specialization kind remained TSK_Undeclared. And because it was implicit
instantiation, we didn't mark the decl as invalid. So when we try to
find the best matching partial specialization the second time, we hit
the assertion as partial specialization is already set.

Fix by reusing stored partial specialization when available, instead of
looking for the best match every time.

rdar://problem/39524996

Reviewers: rsmith, arphaman

Reviewed By: rsmith

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46909

llvm-svn: 332509
2018-05-16 18:28:58 +00:00
Charles Li
85dec55989 [Lit Test] Updated 20 Lit tests to be C++11 compatible.
This is the 5th Lit test patch.
Expanded expected diagnostics to vary by C++ dialect.
Expanded RUN line to: default, C++98/03 and C++11.

llvm-svn: 255196
2015-12-10 01:07:17 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
b4f4d512ad When converting an integral template argument value to a non-type
template parameter of type 'bool', force the value to be zero or
one. Fixes <rdar://problem/9169404>.

llvm-svn: 130873
2011-05-04 21:55:00 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
e902956f59 Partial and full specializations of a class template may have a
different tag kind ("struct" vs. "class") than the primary template,
which has an affect on access control.

Should fix the last remaining Boost.Accumulors failure.

llvm-svn: 103144
2010-05-06 00:28:52 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar
8fbe78f6fc Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'.
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
   which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
   can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
   a default target).

llvm-svn: 91446
2009-12-15 20:14:24 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
9dc8bd327f Keep track of the template arguments deduced when matching a class
template partial specialization. Then, use those template arguments
when instantiating members of that class template partial
specialization. Fixes PR4607.

llvm-svn: 77925
2009-08-02 23:24:31 +00:00