When compiling compiler-rt with -fsanitize=undefined and running testcases you
end up with the following warning:
UBSan: floatsidf.c:32:9: negation of -2147483648 cannot be represented in type 'si_int' (aka 'long'); cast to an unsigned type to negate this value to itself
The same kind of pattern exists in floatsisf.c
This was found in an out of tree target.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146123
Currently the *tf builtin functions can only be built if long double is an
IEEE float, which prevents them from being available e.g. for x86 targets
(unlike libgcc which has them). This non-functional change prepares the
builtins library *tf functions for being able to target x86 by decoupling
their presence from CRT_LDBL_128BIT and instead checking for a
CRT_HAS_TF_MODE macro. This change is NFC since the CRT_HAS_TF_MODE is
currently only set if long double is an IEEE 128-bit float.
Reviewed By: compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153812
`__builtin_c[tl]z` accepts `unsigned int` argument that is not always the
same as uint32_t. For example, `unsigned int` is uint16_t on MSP430.
Reviewed By: aykevl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86547
Use s[iu]_int instead of `(unsigned) int` and d[ui]_int instead of
`(unsigned) long long` for LibCall arguments.
Note: the `*vfp` LibCall versions were NOT touched.
Reviewed By: aykevl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86546
Update formatting to use the LLVM style.
This is part of the cleanup proposed in "[RFC] compiler-rt builtins
cleanup and refactoring".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60351
llvm-svn: 359410
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Negative numbers were handled properly initially, but got broken
during addressing review, so none of them did actually work. Issues:
* Wrong negation.
* Wrong exponent calculation.
llvm-svn: 243746
