Move non-common files from FortranCommon to FortranSupport (analogous to
LLVMSupport) such that
* declarations and definitions that are only used by the Flang compiler,
but not by the runtime, are moved to FortranSupport
* declarations and definitions that are used by both ("common"), the
compiler and the runtime, remain in FortranCommon
* generic STL-like/ADT/utility classes and algorithms remain in
FortranCommon
This allows a for cleaner separation between compiler and runtime
components, which are compiled differently. For instance, runtime
sources must not use STL's `<optional>` which causes problems with CUDA
support. Instead, the surrogate header `flang/Common/optional.h` must be
used. This PR fixes this for `fast-int-sel.h`.
Declarations in include/Runtime are also used by both, but are
header-only. `ISO_Fortran_binding_wrapper.h`, a header used by compiler
and runtime, is also moved into FortranCommon.
Begin upstreaming of CUDA Fortran support in LLVM Flang.
This first patch implements parsing for CUDA Fortran syntax,
including:
- a new LanguageFeature enum value for CUDA Fortran
- driver change to enable that feature for *.cuf and *.CUF source files
- parse tree representation of CUDA Fortran syntax
- dumping and unparsing of the parse tree
- the actual parsers for CUDA Fortran syntax
- prescanning support for !@CUF and !$CUF
- basic sanity testing via unparsing and parse tree dumps
... along with any minimized changes elsewhere to make these
work, mostly no-op cases in common::visitors instances in
semantics and lowering to allow them to compile in the face
of new types in variant<> instances in the parse tree.
Because CUDA Fortran allows the kernel launch chevron syntax
("call foo<<<blocks, threads>>>()") only on CALL statements and
not on function references, the parse tree nodes for CallStmt,
FunctionReference, and their shared Call were rearranged a bit;
this caused a fair amount of one-line changes in many files.
More patches will follow that implement CUDA Fortran in the symbol
table and name resolution, and then semantic checking.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150159
The parser combinator withMessage("error message"_err_en_US, PARSER) is meant
to run the parser PARSER and, if it fails, override its error messages if
it failed silently or it was unable to recognize any tokens at all. This
gives the parser a way to avoid emitting some confusing or missing error
messages. Unfortunately, the implementation could sometimes lose track of
whether any tokens had been recognized, leading to problems with outer usage
of withMessage() and also -- more seriously -- with ParseState::CombineFailedParses().
That's a utility that determines which error messages to retain when two
or more parsers have been attempted at the same starting point and none
of them succceed. Its policy is to retain the state from the parser that
consumed the most input text before failing, so long as it had recognized at
least one token.
So anyway, fix up withMessage(), adjust the tests, and add a test of the
original motivating confusing error situation, in which a syntax error in
a COMMON statement was being diagnosed as a problem with a statement function
definition because withMessage() had lost the fact that the parse of the
COMMON statement had recognized some tokens, and the last attempted parse
later was a failed attempt to parse a statement function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135216
-Wctad-maybe-unsupported is now disabled for flang so these explicit
deduction guides are not required.
This reverts commit ec3956b6e63c1524d6b024ba5db9ffcd7281ada0.
Extend "extension<LanguageFeature>()" to incorporate an explanatory
message better than the current generic "nonstandard usage:".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122035
Using recently established message severity codes, upgrade
non-fatal messages to usage and portability warnings as
appropriate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121246
EQUIVALENCE storage association of objects whose types are not
both default-kind numeric storage sequences, or not both default-kind
character storage sequences, are not standard conformant.
However, most Fortran compilers admit such usage, with warnings
in strict conformance mode. This patch allos EQUIVALENCE of objects
that have sequence types that are either identical, both numeric
sequences (of default kind or not), or both character sequences.
Non-sequence types, and sequences types that are not homogeneously
numeric or character, remain errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119848
The implementation of Messages with forward_list<> makes some
nonstandard assumptions about the validity of iterators that don't
hold up with MSVC's implementation. Use list<> instead. The
measured performance is comparable.
This change obviated a distinction between two member functions
of Messages, and the uses of one have been replaced with calls
to the other.
Similar usage in CharBuffer was also replaced for consistency.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91210
Msvc has difficulties deducing the template argument here. The error message is:
```
basic-parsers.h(790,12): error C2672: 'applyFunction': no matching overloaded function found
```
Explicitly pass the first template argument to help it.
This patch is part of the series to make flang compilable with MS Visual Studio <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2020-July/000448.html>.
Reviewed By: DavidTruby
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87961
MSVC tries to expand templates that are in the false-branch of a `if constexpr` construct. In this case, the condition checks whether a tuple has at least one element and then is trying to access it using `std::get<0>`, which fails when the tuple has 0 elements.
The workaround is to extract that case into a separate method.
This patch is part of the series to make flang compilable with MS Visual Studio <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2020-July/000448.html>.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87728
Msvc has trouble defining a struct/class and defining a constexpr symbol in the same declarator. It reports the following error:
```
basic-parsers.h(809): error C2131: expression did not evaluate to a constant
basic-parsers.h(809): note: failure was caused by call of undefined function or one not declared 'constexpr'
basic-parsers.h(809): note: see usage of 'Fortran::parser::OkParser::OkParser'
```
Fix the msvc compilation by splitting the two definitions into two separate declarators.
This patch is part of the series to [[ http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2020-July/000448.html | make flang compilable with MS Visual Studio ]].
Reviewed By: DavidTruby, klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85937
G++ 10.1 emits inappropriate "use of uninitialized data" warnings when
compiling f18. The warnings stem from two sites in templatized code
whose multiple instantiations magnified the number of warnings.
These changes dodge those warnings by making some innocuous changes to
the code. In the parser, the idiom defaulted(cut >> x), which yields a
parser that always succeeds, has been replaced with a new equivalent
pass<T>() parser that returns a default-constructed value T{} in an
arguably more readable fashion. This idiom was the only attestation of
the basic parser cut, so it has been removed and the remaining code
simplified. In Evaluate/traverse.h, a return {}; was replaced with a
return of a default-constructed member.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81747
