This patch does a few things:
- `__libcpp_is_signed_integer` and `__libcpp_is_unsigned_integer` are
refactored to be variable templates instead of class templates.
- the two traits are merged into a single header
`<__type_traits/integer_traits.h>`.
- `__libcpp_signed_integer`, `__libcpp_unsigned_integer` and
`__libcpp_integer` are moved into the same header.
- The above mentioned concepts are renamed to `__signed_integer`,
`__unsigned_integer` and `__signed_or_unsigned_integer` respectively.
This patch adds a large number of missing includes in the libc++ headers
and the test suite. Those were found as part of the effort to move
towards a mostly monolithic top-level std module.
## Abstract
This pull request removes the `__workaround_52970` concept. This concept
is a workaround for a bug described in #52970, which causes the compiler
to trigger ADL on a pointer to an incomplete type in an SFINAE context.
This bug is fixed in Clang 14.
## Reference
- [[clang] Don't typo-fix an expression in a SFINAE
context](https://reviews.llvm.org/D117603)
- [[libc++] [ranges] ADL-proof the [range.access]
CPOs.](https://reviews.llvm.org/D116239)
These headers have become very small by using compiler builtins, often
containing only two declarations. This merges these headers, since
there doesn't seem to be much of a benefit keeping them separate.
Specifically, `is_{,_nothrow,_trivially}{assignable,constructible}` are
kept and the `copy`, `move` and `default` versions of these type traits
are moved in to the respective headers.
This updates the clang-format we use in libc++ to 17. This is necessary
to start running the generated-files checks in GitHub Actions (in
#68920). In fact this is a pre-existing issue regardless of #68920 --
right now our ignore_format.txt job disagrees with the LLVM-wide
clang-format job.
POSIX allows certain macros to exist with generic names (i.e. refresh(), move(), and erase()) to exist in `curses.h` which conflict with functions found in std::filesystem, among others. This patch undefs the macros in question and adds them to LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS and LIBCPP_POP_MACROS.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147356
This commit does a pass of clang-format over files in libc++ that
don't require major changes to conform to our style guide, or for
which we're not overly concerned about conflicting with in-flight
patches or hindering the git blame.
This roughly covers:
- benchmarks
- range algorithms
- concepts
- type traits
I did a manual verification of all the changes, and in particular I
applied clang-format on/off annotations in a few places where the
result was less readable after than before. This was not necessary
in a lot of places, however I did find that clang-format had pretty
bad taste when it comes to formatting concepts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153140
We already have a clang-tidy check for making sure that `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` is on free functions. This patch extends this to class members. The places where we don't check for `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` are classes for which we have an instantiation in the library.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: jplehr, mikhail.ramalho, sstefan1, libcxx-commits, krytarowski, miyuki, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142332
This change is almost fully mechanical. The only interesting change is in `generate_feature_test_macro_components.py` to generate `_LIBCPP_STD_VER >=` instead. To avoid churn in the git-blame this commit should be added to the `.git-blame-ignore-revs` once committed.
Reviewed By: ldionne, var-const, #libc
Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits, arichardson, arphaman, wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143962
While it's not necessary to qualify calls to `declval` it makes error messages very crypric if the declaration isn't reachable anymore
For example:
```
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:53:66: error: no type named 'type' in 'std::common_type<long, long>'
typedef chrono::duration<typename common_type<_Rep1, _Rep2>::type,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__type_traits/common_type.h:107:14: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::common_type<std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>, std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>>' requested here
: public common_type<_Tp, _Tp> {};
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:279:58: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::common_type<std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>>' requested here
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR typename common_type<duration>::type operator+() const {return typename common_type<duration>::type(*this);}
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:308:54: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>' requested here
typedef duration< int, ratio_multiply<ratio<24>, hours::period>> days;
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:280:81: error: no type named 'type' in 'std::common_type<std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>>'
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR typename common_type<duration>::type operator-() const {return typename common_type<duration>::type(-__rep_);}
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:308:54: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>' requested here
typedef duration< int, ratio_multiply<ratio<24>, hours::period>> days;
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:53:66: error: no type named 'type' in 'std::common_type<int, int>'
typedef chrono::duration<typename common_type<_Rep1, _Rep2>::type,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__type_traits/common_type.h:107:14: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::common_type<std::chrono::duration<int, std::ratio<86400, 1>>, std::chrono::duration<int, std::ratio<86400, 1>>>' requested here
: public common_type<_Tp, _Tp> {};
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:279:58: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::common_type<std::chrono::duration<int, std::ratio<86400, 1>>>' requested here
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR typename common_type<duration>::type operator+() const {return typename common_type<duration>::type(*this);}
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:309:55: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::chrono::duration<int, std::ratio<86400, 1>>' requested here
typedef duration< int, ratio_multiply<ratio<7>, days::period>> weeks;
^
19 similar errors omitted
```
changes with qualification added to:
```
While building module 'std' imported from /home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.trans/meta.trans.other/common_type.pass.cpp:13:
In file included from <module-includes>:17:
In file included from /home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/math.h:309:
In file included from /home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/limits:107:
In file included from /home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/type_traits:432:
In file included from /home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__type_traits/common_reference.h:13:
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__type_traits/common_type.h:28:43: error: declaration of 'declval' must be imported from module 'std.utility.__utility.declval' before it is required
using __cond_type = decltype(false ? std::declval<_Tp>() : std::declval<_Up>());
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__utility/declval.h:30:34: note: declaration here is not visible
decltype(std::__declval<_Tp>(0)) declval() _NOEXCEPT;
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.trans/meta.trans.other/common_type.pass.cpp:13:10: fatal error: could not build module 'std'
#include <functional>
~~~~~~~~^
2 errors generated.
```
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130854
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e77 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124
Per Discord discussion, we're normalizing on a simple `!defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS)`
so that we can do a big search-and-replace for `!defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS)`
back into `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17` when we're ready to abandon support for concept-syntax-less
compilers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118748
For example, `std::ranges::range<Holder<Incomplete>*>` should be
well-formed false, not a hard error at compile time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116239
D103357 added some new concepts. Since the header `<concepts>` has moved
all its concepts to a separate header these new concepts feel out of
place. Move them to the appropriate header.
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109075
