The std::advance function has a clear precondition that it can only be
called with a negative distance when a bidirectional iterator is used.
However, prev() and next() don't have such preconditions explicitly,
they inherit it from calling advance().
This patch removes assertions in prev() and next() that were duplicates
of similar ones in advance(), and removes a copy-pasted comment that was
trying to justify the use of _LIBCPP_ASSERT_PEDANTIC but IMO is creating
confusion with little benefit.
We originally put implementation-detail function objects into individual
namespaces for `std::ranges` without a good reason for doing so. This
practice was continued, presumably because there was prior art. Since
there's no reason to keep these namespaces, this commit removes them,
which will slightly impact binary size.
This commit does not apply to CPOs, some of which need additional work.
Currently, the bounds check in `std::ranges::advance(it, n, s)` is done
_before_ `n` is checked. This results in one extra, unneeded bounds
check.
Thus, `std::ranges::advance(it, 1, s)` currently is _not_ simply
equivalent to:
```c++
if (it != s) {
++it;
}
```
This difference in behavior matters when the check involves some
"expensive" logic. For example, the `==` operator of
`std::istreambuf_iterator` may actually have to read the underlying
`streambuf`.
Swapping around the checks in the `while` results in the expected
behavior.
Also introduce `_LIBCPP_ASSERT_PEDANTIC` for assertions violating which
results in a no-op or other benign behavior, but which may nevertheless
indicate a bug in the invoking code.
This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.
This patch was generated with:
find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i
A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
POSIX allows certain macros to exist with generic names (i.e. refresh(), move(), and erase()) to exist in `curses.h` which conflict with functions found in std::filesystem, among others. This patch undefs the macros in question and adds them to LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS and LIBCPP_POP_MACROS.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147356
Replace most uses of `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` with
`_LIBCPP_ASSERT_UNCATEGORIZED`.
This is done as a prerequisite to introducing hardened mode to libc++.
The idea is to make enabling assertions an opt-in with (somewhat)
fine-grained controls over which categories of assertions are enabled.
The vast majority of assertions are currently uncategorized; the new
macro will allow turning on `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` (the underlying mechanism
for all kinds of assertions) without enabling all the uncategorized
assertions (in the future; this patch preserves the current behavior).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153816
We plan to add concepts for checking that iterators actually provide what they claim to. This is to avoid people thinking that these type traits actually check the iterator requirements in more detail.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: Mordante, libcxx-commits, wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150801
We changed the `abort` calls when trying to throw exceptions in `-fno-exceptions` mode to `__verbose_abort` calls, which removes the dependency in most files.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: dim, emaste, mikhail.ramalho, smeenai, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146076
This change is almost fully mechanical. The only interesting change is in `generate_feature_test_macro_components.py` to generate `_LIBCPP_STD_VER >=` instead. To avoid churn in the git-blame this commit should be added to the `.git-blame-ignore-revs` once committed.
Reviewed By: ldionne, var-const, #libc
Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits, arichardson, arphaman, wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143962
While it's not necessary to qualify calls to `declval` it makes error messages very crypric if the declaration isn't reachable anymore
For example:
```
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:53:66: error: no type named 'type' in 'std::common_type<long, long>'
typedef chrono::duration<typename common_type<_Rep1, _Rep2>::type,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__type_traits/common_type.h:107:14: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::common_type<std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>, std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>>' requested here
: public common_type<_Tp, _Tp> {};
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:279:58: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::common_type<std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>>' requested here
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR typename common_type<duration>::type operator+() const {return typename common_type<duration>::type(*this);}
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:308:54: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>' requested here
typedef duration< int, ratio_multiply<ratio<24>, hours::period>> days;
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:280:81: error: no type named 'type' in 'std::common_type<std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>>'
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR typename common_type<duration>::type operator-() const {return typename common_type<duration>::type(-__rep_);}
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:308:54: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>' requested here
typedef duration< int, ratio_multiply<ratio<24>, hours::period>> days;
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:53:66: error: no type named 'type' in 'std::common_type<int, int>'
typedef chrono::duration<typename common_type<_Rep1, _Rep2>::type,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__type_traits/common_type.h:107:14: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::common_type<std::chrono::duration<int, std::ratio<86400, 1>>, std::chrono::duration<int, std::ratio<86400, 1>>>' requested here
: public common_type<_Tp, _Tp> {};
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:279:58: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::common_type<std::chrono::duration<int, std::ratio<86400, 1>>>' requested here
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR typename common_type<duration>::type operator+() const {return typename common_type<duration>::type(*this);}
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:309:55: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::chrono::duration<int, std::ratio<86400, 1>>' requested here
typedef duration< int, ratio_multiply<ratio<7>, days::period>> weeks;
^
19 similar errors omitted
```
changes with qualification added to:
```
While building module 'std' imported from /home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.trans/meta.trans.other/common_type.pass.cpp:13:
In file included from <module-includes>:17:
In file included from /home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/math.h:309:
In file included from /home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/limits:107:
In file included from /home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/type_traits:432:
In file included from /home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__type_traits/common_reference.h:13:
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__type_traits/common_type.h:28:43: error: declaration of 'declval' must be imported from module 'std.utility.__utility.declval' before it is required
using __cond_type = decltype(false ? std::declval<_Tp>() : std::declval<_Up>());
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__utility/declval.h:30:34: note: declaration here is not visible
decltype(std::__declval<_Tp>(0)) declval() _NOEXCEPT;
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.trans/meta.trans.other/common_type.pass.cpp:13:10: fatal error: could not build module 'std'
#include <functional>
~~~~~~~~^
2 errors generated.
```
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130854
This was discussed on Discord with the consensus that we should rename the macros.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, var-const, avogelsgesang, jloser, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131498
When we ship LLVM 16, <ranges> won't be considered experimental anymore.
We might as well do this sooner rather than later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132151
There are many more instances of this pattern, but I chose to limit this change to .rst files (docs), anything in libcxx/include, and string literals. These have the highest chance of being seen by end users.
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante, martong, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124708
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e77 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124
This is the first step towards disentangling the debug mode and assertions
in libc++. This patch doesn't make any functional change: it simply moves
_LIBCPP_ASSERT-related stuff to its own file so as to make it clear that
libc++ assertions and the debug mode are different things. Future patches
will make it possible to enable assertions without enabling the debug
mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119769
The logic here is that we are disabling *only* things in `std::ranges::`.
Everything in `std::` is permitted, including `default_sentinel`, `contiguous_iterator`,
`common_iterator`, `projected`, `swappable`, and so on. Then, we include
anything from `std::ranges::` that is required in order to make those things
work: `ranges::swap`, `ranges::swap_ranges`, `input_range`, `ranges::begin`,
`ranges::iter_move`, and so on. But then that's all. Everything else (including
notably all of the "views" and the `std::views` namespace itself) is still
locked up behind `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118736
The macro that opts out of `std::ranges::` functionality is called
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`, and is unrelated to this macro
which is specifically about _compiler_ support for the _syntax_.
The only non-mechanical diff here is in `<__config>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118507
In `ranges::advance(iter, n, bound)`, we'd incorrectly handle the case
where bound < iter and n is 0:
int a[10];
int *p = a+5;
int *bound = a+3;
std::ranges::advance(p, 0, bound);
assert(p - a == 5); // we'd return 3 before this patch
This was caused by an incorrect handling of 0 inside __magnitude_geq.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117240
As prefigured in the comments on D115315.
This gives us one unified style for all niebloids,
and also simplifies the modulemap.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116570
The NFC part of D116809. We still want to enforce this in CI,
but the mechanism for that is still to-be-determined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116809
The reason for those nested namespaces is explained in D115315:
> AIUI, this keeps the CPO's own type from ADL'ing into the `std::ranges`
> namespace; e.g. `foobar(std::ranges::uninitialized_default_construct)`
> should not consider `std::ranges::foobar` a candidate, even if
> `std::ranges::foobar` is not a CPO itself. Also, of course, consistency
> (Chesterton's Fence, the economist's hundred-dollar bill): if it were
> safe to omit the namespace, we'd certainly want to do it everywhere,
> not just here.
This makes these three niebloids more consistent with the other Ranges
niebloids we've already implemented, such as the `ranges::begin` group
and the `ranges::uninitialized_default_construct` group.
FWIW, we still have three different indentation-and-comment styles
among these three groups.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116569
Defined in [`specialized.algorithms`](wg21.link/specialized.algorithms).
Also:
- refactor the existing non-range implementation so that most of it
can be shared between the range-based and non-range-based algorithms;
- remove an existing test for the non-range version of
`uninitialized_default_construct{,_n}` that likely triggered undefined
behavior (it read the values of built-ins after default-initializing
them, essentially reading uninitialized memory).
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115315
In other places in the code, we use lowercase spelling for things that
are not available in prior standards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109435
Feedback requested in D106735 applied in Diff 3 seem to have
reverted in Diff 4. This patch fixes that up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106829
See LWG reflector thread of 2021-07-23 titled
'Question on ranges::advance and "past-the-sentinel iterators"'.
Test case heavily based on one graciously provided by Casey Carter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106735
This started as fixing a typo in a ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS directive
which turned out to uncover a few places where we warned about signedness
changes.
As a fly-by fix, this updates the various __advance overloads
for style consistency.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106372
`__function_like` wasn't being exported, so certain properties of the
`ranges` functions weren't being propagated in modules land.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105078
We've been forgetting to add those to most of the <ranges> review.
To avoid forgetting in the future, I added an item in the pre-commit
checklist.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106287
This has been broken out of D104170 since it should be merged whether or
not we go ahead with the module map changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104175
This started as an attempt to fix a GCC 11 warning of misplaced parentheses.
I then noticed that trying to fix the parentheses warning actually triggered
errors in the tests, showing that we were incorrectly assuming that the
implementation of ranges::advance was using operator+= or operator-=.
This commit fixes that issue and makes the tests easier to follow by
localizing the assertions it makes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103272
