Implement P2255R2 tuple.apply part wording for `std::make_from_tuple`.
```
Mandates: If tuple_size_v<remove_reference_t<Tuple>> is 1, then reference_constructs_from_temporary_v<T, decltype(get<0>(declval<Tuple>()))> is false.
```
Fixes#154274
---------
Signed-off-by: yronglin <yronglin777@gmail.com>
The SFINAE isn't required, since the primary `tuple` class already does
the SFINAE checks. This removes a bit of code that was only used for
these constraints.
This also moves the `tuple_element` specialization for `tuple` to
`__fwd/tuple.h` to avoid a dependency on `__tuple/sfinae_helpers.h`
(which should be moved in a follow-up).
And constrain the new `operator==` since C++26.
This patch implements parts of P2165R4, P2944R3, and a possibly improved
resolution of LWG3882. Currently, libstdc++ and MSVC STL constrain the
new overloads in the same way.
Also set feature-test macro `__cpp_lib_constrained_equality` and add
related release note, as P2944R3 will completed with this patch.
Fixes#136765Fixes#136770Fixes#105424
The internal API is a lot more complicated than it actually needs to be.
This refactors the internal API to match the features and names of the
public one.
Currently, libc++'s `<tuple>` is using the deprecated
`__reference_binds_to_temporary` intrinsic. This PR starts to use
`__reference_constructs_from_temporary` if possible.
It seems that `__reference_constructs_from_temporary` should be used via
an internal type traits provided in
`<__type_traits/reference_constructs_from_temporary.h>`. But given the
old intrinsic was directly used, this PR doesn't switch to the current
convention yet.
P2255R2 is related. Although the paper indicated that constructors of
`tuple` should be deleted in such a case.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nikolas Klauser <nikolasklauser@berlin.de>
That type trait represents whether move-assigning an object is
equivalent to destroying it and then move-constructing a new one from
the same argument. This will be useful in a few places where we may want
to destroy + construct instead of doing an assignment, in particular
when implementing some container operations in terms of relocation.
This is effectively adding a library emulation of P2786R12's
is_replaceable trait, similarly to what we do for trivial relocation.
Eventually, we can replace this library emulation by the real
compiler-backed trait.
This is building towards #129328.
Currently, when the result type is 1-`tuple`, `tuple_cat` possibly tests
an undesired constructor of the element, due to conversion from the
reference tuple to the result type. If the element type has an
unconstrained constructor template, there can be extraneous hard error
which shouldn't happen.
This patch introduces a helper function template to select the element-wise
constructor template of `tuple`, which can avoid such error.
Fixes#41034.
This patch implements the forwarding to frozen C++03 headers as
discussed in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-freezing-c-03-headers-in-libc. In the
RFC, we initially proposed selecting the right headers from the Clang
driver, however consensus seemed to steer towards handling this in the
library itself. This patch implements that direction.
At a high level, the changes basically amount to making each public
header look like this:
```
// inside <vector>
#ifdef _LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG
# include <__cxx03/vector>
#else
// normal <vector> content
#endif
```
In most cases, public headers are simple umbrella headers so there isn't
much code in the #else branch. In other cases, the #else branch contains
the actual implementation of the header.
This patch adds a large number of missing includes in the libc++ headers
and the test suite. Those were found as part of the effort to move
towards a mostly monolithic top-level std module.
This re-formats a few headers that had become out-of-sync with respect
to formatting since we ran clang-format on the whole codebase. There's
surprisingly few instances of it.
As time went by, a few files have become mis-formatted w.r.t.
clang-format. This was made worse by the fact that formatting was not
being enforced in extensionless headers. This commit simply brings all
of libcxx/include in-line with clang-format again.
We might have to do this from time to time as we update our clang-format
version, but frankly this is really low effort now that we've formatted
everything once.
This changes the `is_swappable` implementation to use variable templates
first and basing the class templates on that. This avoids instantiating
them when the `_v` versions are used, which are generally less resource
intensive.
`__apply_cv_t` and `__copy_cvref_t` are very closely related. They are
in fact identical except that `__copy_cvref_t` handles rvalue references
properly. Some uses don't actually require handling of references, so
they are replaced with `__copy_cv_t`.
This moves the definition of a `pair` constructor for `<tuple>` to
`<__utility/pair.h>` and uses the forward declaration of `pair` in
`<tuple>` instead of including the definition.
Implement [LWG3528](https://wg21.link/LWG3528).
Based on LWG3528(https://wg21.link/LWG3528) and
http://eel.is/c++draft/description#structure.requirements-9, the
standard allows to impose requirements, we constraint
`std::make_from_tuple` to make `std::make_from_tuple` SFINAE friendly
and also avoid worse diagnostic messages. We still keep the constraints
of `std::__make_from_tuple_impl` so that `std::__make_from_tuple_impl`
will have the same advantages when used alone.
---------
Signed-off-by: yronglin <yronglin777@gmail.com>
These headers have become very small by using compiler builtins, often
containing only two declarations. This merges these headers, since
there doesn't seem to be much of a benefit keeping them separate.
Specifically, `is_{,_nothrow,_trivially}{assignable,constructible}` are
kept and the `copy`, `move` and `default` versions of these type traits
are moved in to the respective headers.
We've talked about allowing extensions on
[discourse](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-use-language-extensions-from-future-standards-in-libc/71898/5)
and in a libc++ monthly meeting and agreed to test it out in the LLVM 18
release. We've done that with the `tuple` constructor overload set
(using conditional `explicit`). Since we haven't heard about any
breakages, it seems safe to do. This patch enables the use of extension
from later C++ standards inside the versioned `std` namespaces. This
should be good enough, since almost all of our code is inside that
namespace. This approach also avoids the use of extensions inside the
test `std` suite. That part of the code base should stay clean, since
it's a test suite that is also used by other vendors to test their
implementations.
Originally, we used __libcpp_verbose_abort to handle assertion failures.
That function was declared from all public headers. Since we don't use
that mechanism anymore, we don't need to declare __libcpp_verbose_abort
from all public headers, and we can clean up a lot of unnecessary
includes.
This patch also moves the definition of the various assertion categories
to the <__assert> header, since we now rely on regular IWYU for these
assertion macros.
rdar://105510916
As pointed out by @Zingam the paper was implemented in libc++ as an
extension. This patch does the bookkeeping. The inital release version
is based on historical release dates.
Completes:
- Add a conditional noexcept specification to std::apply
This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.
This patch was generated with:
find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i
A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
This is in preparation for clang-formatting the whole code base. These
annotations are required either to avoid clang-format bugs or because
the manually formatted code is significantly more readable than the
clang-formatted alternative. All in all, it seems like very few
annotations are required, which means that clang-format is doing a very
good job in most cases.
In preparation for running clang-format on the whole code base, we are
also removing mentions of the legacy _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY macro in
favor of the newer _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI.
We're still leaving the definition of _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to avoid
creating needless breakage in case some older patches are checked-in
with mentions of the old macro. After we branch for LLVM 18, we can do
another pass to clean up remaining uses of the macro that might have
gotten introduced by mistake (if any) and remove the macro itself at the
same time. This is just a minor convenience to smooth out the transition
as much as possible.
See
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
for the clang-format proposal.
This reduces the number of instantiations and also avoid blowing up
past the fold-expression limit of Clang.
This is NOT a general statement that we should strive to stay within
Clang's (sometimes way too small) limits, however in this case the
change will reduce the number of template instantiations while at the
same time doing that, which is good.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132509
