This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
This is a follow-up patch to 6f7835f309b9.
As explained previously, when running from an IDE, it can happen that
the IDE imports some lldb scripts by itself. If the user also tries to
import these commands, lldb will show the following message:
```
error: cannot add command: user command exists and force replace not set
```
This message is confusing to the user, because it suggests that the
command import failed and that the execution should stop. However, in
this case, lldb will continue the execution with the command added
previously by the user.
To prevent that, this patch updates every first-party lldb-packaged
custom commands to override commands that were pre-imported in lldb.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140293
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Update examples and docs to demonstrate using `__lldb_init_module` instead of
the idiom that checks for `lldb.debugger` at the top-level.
```
if __name__ == '__main__':
...
elif lldb.debugger:
...
```
Is replaced with:
```
if __name__ == '__main__':
...
def __lldb_init_module(debugger, internal_dict):
...
```
This change is for two reasons. First, it's generally encouraged not to only
use the convenience singletons (`lldb.{debugger,process,target,etc}`)
interactively from the `script` command. Second, there's a bug where
registering a python class as a command (using `command script add -c ...`),
result in the command not being runnable. Note that registering function-backed
commands does not have this bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117237
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
print five words of memory at the beginning of the stack frame so it's
easier to track where an incorrect saved-fp or saved-pc may have come from.
llvm-svn: 185903
Change the simple-minded stack walk to not depend on lldb to unwind
the first frame.
Collect a list of Modules and Addresses seen while backtracing (with
both methods), display the image list output for all of those modules,
plus disassemble and image show-unwind any additional frames that
the simple backtrace was able to unwind through instead of just the
lldb unwind algorithm frames.
Remove checks for older lldb's that didn't support -a for disassemble
or specifying the assembler syntax on x86 targets.
llvm-svn: 184280
finish-swig-Python-LLDB.sh to create a new lldb.diagnose subdirectory
in the LLDB framework; the first diagnostic command in this directory
is diagnose-unwind. There may be others added in the future.
Users can load these diagnostic tools into their session with
"script import lldb.diagnose".
llvm-svn: 180768
