Model the `IndexType` as `uint64_t` when converting to a python integer.
With the python bindings,
```python
DenseIntElementsAttr(op.attributes["attr"])
```
used to `assert` when `attr` had `index` type like `dense<[1, 2, 3, 4]>
: vector<4xindex>`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Christopher McGirr <christopher.mcgirr@amd.com>
Co-authored-by: Tiago Trevisan Jost <tiago.trevisanjost@amd.com>
This reverts a feature introduced in commit
2a5d497494c24425e99655b85e2277dd3f15a400. The goal of that commit was to
allow `StringAttr`s to by used transparently wherever Python `str`s are
expected. But, as the tests in https://reviews.llvm.org/D159182 reveal,
pybind11 doesn't do this conversion based on `__str__` automatically,
unlike for the other types introduced in the commit above. At the same
time, changing `__str__` breaks the symmetry with other attributes of
`print(attr)` printing the assembly of the attribute, so the change
probably has more disadvantages than advantages.
Reviewed By: springerm, rkayaith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D159255
The printing of `StringAttr` was changed in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D158974, such that some test cases relying on
that output had to be changed as well.
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our
Python code.
Reformatting is done with `black`.
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you
have made changes to a python file, the best way to handle that
is to run git checkout --ours <yourfile> and then reformat it
with black.
If you run into any problems, post to discourse about it and
we will try to help.
RFC Thread below:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150782
Right now the bindings assume that all DenseElementsAttrs correspond to tensor values,
making it impossible to create vector-typed constants. I didn't want to change the API
significantly, so I opted for reusing the current signature of `.get`. Its `type` argument
now accepts both element types (in which case `shape` and `signless` can be specified too),
or a shaped type, which specifies the full type of the created attr (`shape` cannot be specified
in that case).
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145053
This commit moves FuncOp out of the builtin dialect, and into the Func
dialect. This move has been planned in some capacity from the moment
we made FuncOp an operation (years ago). This commit handles the
functional aspects of the move, but various aspects are left untouched
to ease migration: func::FuncOp is re-exported into mlir to reduce
the actual API churn, the assembly format still accepts the unqualified
`func`. These temporary measures will remain for a little while to
simplify migration before being removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121266
The last remaining operations in the standard dialect all revolve around
FuncOp/function related constructs. This patch simply handles the initial
renaming (which by itself is already huge), but there are a large number
of cleanups unlocked/necessary afterwards:
* Removing a bunch of unnecessary dependencies on Func
* Cleaning up the From/ToStandard conversion passes
* Preparing for the move of FuncOp to the Func dialect
See the discussion at https://discourse.llvm.org/t/standard-dialect-the-final-chapter/6061
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120624
While working on an integration, I found a lot of inconsistencies on IR printing and verification. It turns out that we were:
* Only doing "soft fail" verification on IR printing of Operation, not of a Module.
* Failed verification was interacting badly with binary=True IR printing (causing a TypeError trying to pass an `str` to a `bytes` based handle).
* For systematic integrations, it is often desirable to control verification yourself so that you can explicitly handle errors.
This patch:
* Trues up the "soft fail" semantics by having `Module.__str__` delegate to `Operation.__str__` vs having a shortcut implementation.
* Fixes soft fail in the presence of binary=True (and adds an additional happy path test case to make sure the binary functionality works).
* Adds an `assume_verified` boolean flag to the `print`/`get_asm` methods which disables internal verification, presupposing that the caller has taken care of it.
It turns out that we had a number of tests which were generating illegal IR but it wasn't being caught because they were doing a print on the `Module` vs operation. All except two were trivially fixed:
* linalg/ops.py : Had two tests for direct constructing a Matmul incorrectly. Fixing them made them just like the next two tests so just deleted (no need to test the verifier only at this level).
* linalg/opdsl/emit_structured_generic.py : Hand coded conv and pooling tests appear to be using illegal shaped inputs/outputs, causing a verification failure. I just used the `assume_verified=` flag to restore the original behavior and left a TODO. Will get someone who owns that to fix it properly in a followup (would also be nice to break this file up into multiple test modules as it is hard to tell exactly what is failing).
Notes to downstreams:
* If, like some of our tests, you get verification failures after this patch, it is likely that your IR was always invalid and you will need to fix the root cause. To temporarily revert to prior (broken) behavior, replace calls like `print(module)` with `print(module.operation.get_asm(assume_verified=True))`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114680
The current behavior is conveniently allowing to iterate on the regions of an operation
implicitly by exposing an operation as Iterable. However this is also error prone and
code that may intend to iterate on the results or the operands could end up "working"
apparently instead of throwing a runtime error.
The lack of static type checking in Python contributes to the ambiguity here, it seems
safer to not do this and require and explicit qualification to iterate (`op.results`, `op.regions`, ...).
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111697
The new constructor relies on type-based dynamic dispatch and allows one to
construct call operations given an object representing a FuncOp or its name as
a string, as opposed to requiring an explicitly constructed attribute.
Depends On D110947
Reviewed By: stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110948
Without this change, these attributes can only be accessed through the generic
operation attribute dictionary provided the caller knows the special operation
attribute names used for this purpose. Add some Python wrapping to support this
use case.
Also provide access to function arguments usable inside the function along with
a couple of quality-of-life improvements in using block arguments (function
arguments being the arguments of its entry block).
Reviewed By: stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110758
* NFC but has some fixes for CMake glitches discovered along the way (things not cleaning properly, co-mingled depends).
* Includes previously unsubmitted fix in D98681 and a TODO to fix it more appropriately in a smaller followup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101493
