Updated the Python diagnostics handler to emit notes (in addition to
errors) into the output stream so that users have more context as to
where in the IR the error is occurring.
Add overflow flags support to the following ops:
* `arith.addi`
* `arith.subi`
* `arith.muli`
Example of new syntax:
```
%res = arith.addi %arg1, %arg2 overflow<nsw> : i64
```
Similar to existing LLVM dialect syntax
```
%res = llvm.add %arg1, %arg2 overflow<nsw> : i64
```
Tablegen canonicalization patterns updated to always drop flags, proper
support with tests will be added later.
Updated LLVMIR translation as part of this commit as it currenly written
in a way that it will crash when new attributes added to arith ops
otherwise.
Also lower `arith` overflow flags to corresponding SPIR-V op decorations
Discussion
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-integer-overflow-flags-support-in-arith-dialect/76025
This effectively rolls forward #77211, #77700 and #77714 while adding a
test to ensure the Python usage is not broken. More follow up needed but
unrelated to the core change here. The changes here are minimal and just
correspond to "textual namespacing" ODS side, no C++ or Python changes
were needed.
---------
---------
Co-authored-by: Ivan Butygin <ivan.butygin@gmail.com>, Yi Wu <yi.wu2@arm.com>
Add overflow flags support to the following ops:
* `arith.addi`
* `arith.subi`
* `arith.muli`
Example of new syntax:
```
%res = arith.addi %arg1, %arg2 overflow<nsw> : i64
```
Similar to existing LLVM dialect syntax
```
%res = llvm.add %arg1, %arg2 overflow<nsw> : i64
```
Tablegen canonicalization patterns updated to always drop flags, proper
support with tests will be added later.
Updated LLVMIR translation as part of this commit as it currenly written
in a way that it will crash when new attributes added to arith ops
otherwise.
Discussion
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-integer-overflow-flags-support-in-arith-dialect/76025
---------
Co-authored-by: Yi Wu <yi.wu2@arm.com>
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our
Python code.
Reformatting is done with `black`.
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you
have made changes to a python file, the best way to handle that
is to run git checkout --ours <yourfile> and then reformat it
with black.
If you run into any problems, post to discourse about it and
we will try to help.
RFC Thread below:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150782
This updates most (all?) error-diagnostic-emitting python APIs to
capture error diagnostics and include them in the raised exception's
message:
```
>>> Operation.parse('"arith.addi"() : () -> ()'))
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
mlir._mlir_libs.MLIRError: Unable to parse operation assembly:
error: "-":1:1: 'arith.addi' op requires one result
note: "-":1:1: see current operation: "arith.addi"() : () -> ()
```
The diagnostic information is available on the exception for users who
may want to customize the error message:
```
>>> try:
... Operation.parse('"arith.addi"() : () -> ()')
... except MLIRError as e:
... print(e.message)
... print(e.error_diagnostics)
... print(e.error_diagnostics[0].message)
...
Unable to parse operation assembly
[<mlir._mlir_libs._mlir.ir.DiagnosticInfo object at 0x7fed32bd6b70>]
'arith.addi' op requires one result
```
Error diagnostics captured in exceptions aren't propagated to diagnostic
handlers, to avoid double-reporting of errors. The context-level
`emit_error_diagnostics` option can be used to revert to the old
behaviour, causing error diagnostics to be reported to handlers instead
of as part of exceptions.
API changes:
- `Operation.verify` now raises an exception on verification failure,
instead of returning `false`
- The exception raised by the following methods has been changed to
`MLIRError`:
- `PassManager.run`
- `{Module,Operation,Type,Attribute}.parse`
- `{RankedTensorType,UnrankedTensorType}.get`
- `{MemRefType,UnrankedMemRefType}.get`
- `VectorType.get`
- `FloatAttr.get`
closes#60595
depends on D144804, D143830
Reviewed By: stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143869
Previously the elements of the notes tuple would be invalid objects when
accessed from a diagnostic handler, resulting in a segfault when used.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129943
I considered multiple approaches for this but settled on this one because I could make the lifetime management work in a reasonably easy way (others had issues with not being able to cast to a Python reference from a C++ constructor). We could stand to have more formatting helpers, but best to get the core mechanism in first.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116568
